Cesarean delivery on request: Where do we go from here?

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 107, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1222-1223

  Scott, James R ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; EDITORIAL; FETUS MONITORING; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PHYSICIAN; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOCOLYSIS; UNITED STATES; VAGINAL DELIVERY; FEMALE; PREGNANCY; STATISTICS;

CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY;

EID: 33745589550     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000221482.51250.3c     Document Type: Editorial

References (4)

1. Finger C. Caesarean section rates skyrocket in Brazil. Many women are opting for caesareans in the belief that it is a practical solution. Lancet 2003;362:628.
2. Minkoff H, Powderly KP, Chervenak F, McCollough LB. Ethical dimensions of elective primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:387-92.
3. Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hannestad YS, Hunskaar S. Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section. N Engl J Med 2003;348:900-7.
4. Eason E, Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Mondor M. Anal incontinence after childbirth. CMAJ 2002;166:326-30.