Co-evolution of invention activities among cities in New England

Papers in Regional Science

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 47-72

  Co, Catherine Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

Author keywords

City; Invention; New England; Patent

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY PATTERN; ECONOMIC ACTIVITY; METROPOLITAN AREA; STATISTICAL DATA;

NEW ENGLAND; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33745561036     PISSN: 10568190     EISSN: 14355957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2006.00027.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Acs Z, Anselin L, Varga A (2002) Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy 31: 1069-1085
2. Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z (2000) Geographical spillovers and university research: A spatial econometric perspective. Growth and Change 31: 501-515
3. Audretsch D, Feldman M (2004) Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds), Handbook of regional and urban economics, Volume 4: Cities and geography. Elsevier, Amsterdam
4. Audretsch D, Feldman M (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review 86: 630-640
5. Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Convergence. Journal of Political Economy 100: 223-251
6. Beacon Hill Institute (2002) Metro Area and State Competitiveness Report: 2002. Beacon Hill Institute Boston
7. Cheshire PC, Malecki EJ (2004) Growth, development, and innovation: A look backward and forward. Papers in Regional Science 83: 249-267
8. Co CY, Wohar M (2004) Technological convergence among US regions and states. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13: 101-126
9. Co CY (2002) Evolution of the geography of innovation: Evidence from patent data. Growth and Change 33: 393-423
10. Docherty I, Gulliver S, Drake P (2004) Exploring the potential benefits of city collaboration. Regional Studies 38: 445-456
11. Dorfman N (1983) Route 128: The development of a regional high technology economy. Research Policy 12: 299-316
12. Ellison G, Glaeser E (1997) Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy 100: 889-927
13. Feldman M (1994) The geography of innovation. Kluwer Dordrecht
14. Flynn P, Gittell R, Sedgley N (1999) New England as the twenty-first century approaches: No time for complacency. New England Economic Review 0: 41-53
15. Fujita M, Thisse JF (2000) The formation of economic agglomerations: Old problems and new perspectives. In Huriot JM, Thisse JF (eds), Economics of cities: Theoretical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge
16. Glaeser E, Kallal H, Scheinkman J, Shleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy 100: 1126-1152
17. Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28: 1661-1707
18. Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. Working Paper No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research
19. Harhoff D, Narin F, Scherer FM, Vopel K (1999) Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics 81: 511-515
20. Isard W (1956) Location and space-economy: A General theory relating to industrial location, market areas, land use, trade, and urban structure. The Technology Press of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
21. Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Random House, New York
22. Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Fogarty M (2002) The Meaning of Patent Citations: Report on the NBER/Case Western Reserve Survey of Patentees. In: Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (eds), Patents, citations, and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. MIT Press Cambridge
23. Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 577-598
24. Kim S (1995) Expansion of markets and the geographic distribution of economic activities: The trends in U.S. regional manufacturing structure, 1860-1987. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 881-908
25. Krugman P (1991) Economic geography and trade. MIT Press Cambridge
26. ÓhUallacháin B (1999) Patent places: Size matters. Journal of Regional Science 39: 613-636
27. Quah D (1993) Galton's fallacy and tests of the convergence hypothesis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 95: 427-443
28. Porter ME (2000) Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly 14: 15-34
29. Porter ME (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. The Free Press, New York
30. Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2004) Evidence on the Nature and Sources of Agglomeration Economies. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds), Handbook of regional and urban economics, Volume 4: Cities and geography. Elsevier, Amsterdam
31. Saxenian A (1994) Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
32. Silverman BW (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall London
33. Smith P (1999) Do knowledge spillovers contribute to U.S. state output and growth? Journal of Urban Economics 45: 331-353
34. Sokoloff K (1988) Inventive activity in early industrial America: Evidence from patent records, 1790-1846. Journal of Economic History 48: 813-850
35. Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand Journal of Economics 21: 172-187
36. US Bureau of the Census (2004) Journey to work: 2000, Census 2000 Brief. Available at http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/journey.html
37. Varga A (1999). Time-space patterns of U.S. innovation: Stability or change? In: Fischer MM, Suarez-Villa L (eds), Innovation, networks and localities. Springer, Berlin