Diagnostic and prognostic implications of DNA ploidy and S-phase evaluation in the assessment of malignancy in biliary strictures

Endoscopy

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 561-565

  Lindberg, Bo ^a   Enochsson, L ^a   Tribukait, B ^a   Arnelo, U ^a   Bergquist, A ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; CANCER SURVIVAL; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM CANCER; DIPLOIDY; DNA DETERMINATION; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GALLBLADDER CANCER; GENETIC MARKER; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVER CELL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METASTASIS; PANCREAS CANCER; PAPILLARY CARCINOMA; PLOIDY; PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURVIVAL TIME; SWEDEN; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLESTASIS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DNA, NEOPLASM; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GENETIC MARKERS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PLOIDIES; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; S PHASE;

EID: 33745552865     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-925387     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Lammer J, Herlinger H, Zalaudek G, Hofler H. Pseudotumorous pancreatitis. Gastrointest Radiol 1985; 10: 59-67
2. Verbeek PC, van Leeuwen DJ, de Wit LT et al. Benign fibrosing disease at the hepatic confluence mimicking Klatskin tumors. Surgery 1992: 112: 866-871
3. Menges M, Lerch MM, Zeitz M. The double duct sign in patients with malignant and benign pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 74-77
4. Bergquist A, Ekbom A, Olsson R et al. Hepatic and extrahepatic malignancies in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol 2002; 36: 321-327
5. Ferrari AP Jr, Lichtenstein DR, Slivka A et al. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40: 140-145
6. Rabinovitz M, Zajko AB, Hassanein T et al. Diagnostic value of brush cytology in the diagnosis of bile duct carcinoma: a study in 65 patients with bile duct strictures. Hepatology 1990; 12: 747-752
7. Ryan ME. Cytological brushings of ductal lesions during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 139-142
8. Sears RJ, Duckworth CW, Decaestecker C et al. Image cytometry as a discriminatory tool for cytologic specimens obtained by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Cancer 1998; 84: 119-126
9. Rumalla A, Baron TH, Leontovich O et al. Improved diagnostic yield of endoscopic biliary brush cytology by digital image analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 2001; 76: 29-33
10. Ryan ME, Baldauf MC. Comparison of flow cytometry for DNA content and brush cytology for detection of malignancy in pancreaticobiliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40: 133-139
11. Lindberg B, Arnelo U, Bergquist A et al. Diagnosis of biliary strictures in conjunction with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography, with special reference to patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 909-916
12. Lundin J, Nordling S, von Boguslawsky K et al. Prognostic value of Ki-67 expression, ploidy and S-phase fraction in patients with pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res 1995; 15: 2659-2668
13. Karlen P, Kornfeld D, Brostrom O et al. Is colonoscopic surveillance reducing colorectal cancer mortality in ulcerative colitis? A population based case control study. Gut 1998; 42: 711-714
14. Bergquist A, Lindberg B, Castro J, Tribukait B. Methodologic aspects of evaluating brush samples from biliary strictures by cytology and DNA flow cytometry. Acta Cytol 2004; 48: 341-347
15. Bohorfoush A, Franco J, Komorowski R et al. Flow cytometric analysis of bile duct epithelium in primary sclerosing cholangitis potentially assists in timing of liver transplantation [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc A 1997; 45: Abstract no 394
16. Baron TH, Harewood GC, Rumalla A et al. A prospective comparison of digital image analysis and routine cytology for the identification of malignancy in biliary tract strictures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 214-219
17. Harewood GC, Baron TH, Stadheim LM et al. Prospective, blinded assessment of factors influencing the accuracy of biliary cytology interpretation. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 1464-1469
18. Brunt EM, Kraemer BB. DNA image analysis study of lesions of the gallbladder and biliary system. Liver Transpl Surg 1996; 2: 284-289
19. Bergquist A, Tribukait B, Glaumann H, Broomé U. Can DNA cytometry be used for evaluation of malignancy and premalignancy in bile duct strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis? J Hepatol 2000; 33: 873-877
20. Abou-Rebyeh H, Al-Abadi H, Jonas S et al. DNA analysis of cholangiocarcinoma cells: prognostic and clinical importance. Cancer Detect Prev 2002; 26: 313-319
21. Yeaton P, Kiss R, Deviere J et al. Use of cell image analysis in the detection of cancer from specimens obtained during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Am J Clin Pathol 1993; 100: 497-501
22. Brandsaeter B, Isoniemi H, Broome U et al. Liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis; predictors and consequences of hepatobiliary malignancy. J Hepatol 2004; 40: 815-822
23. Goss JA, Shackleton CR, Farmer DG et al. Orthotopic liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis. A 12-year single center experience. Ann Surg 1997; 225: 472-481