Prognostic significance of pin and atypical small acinar proliferation on transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy;Significación pronóstica del PIN y la atípia glandular focal en la Biopsia Transrectal Ecodirigida de Próstata

Actas Urologicas Espanolas

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 359-366

  Rodriguez Patron Rodriguez, Rafael ^a,b   Mayayo Dehesa, T ^a   Burgos Revilla, F J ^a   Sanz Mayayo, E ^a   Garcia Gonzalez R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALCALÁ   (Spain)

^b Universidad de Alcalá de Henares ^*  (Spain)

Author keywords

ASAP; PIN; Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745540106     PISSN: 02104806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0210-4806(06)73459-3     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bostwick DG, Qian J. Schlesinger C. Contemporary pathology of prostate cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2003:30(2):181-207.
2. Young RH, Srigley JR, Amin MB, Ulbright TM, Cubilla AL. Tumors of the prostate gland, seminal vesicles, male urethra, and penis. Atlas of tumor pathology. Armed forces institute of pathology. Washington D.C., 2000.
3. Epstein JL. Are you getting the maximum diagnostic and prognostic information from your prostate needle biopsies? Contemp Urol 999;2:106-118.
4. Rodríguez-Patrón R. Mayayo T. González A. Lennie A, García R, Cuesta C. ¿Pueden los índices basados en el PSA determinar en qué pacientes se debe repetir la biopsia transrectal ecodirigida prostática? Estudio sobre 546 pacientes rebiopsiados. Arch Esp Urol 2002;55:1225-1234.
5. Rodríguez R. Mayayo T, Galbis F, Jiménez M, Burgos FJ, Allona A et al. Utilidad clinica de las pruebas diagnósticas disponibles en el carcinoma prostático. Resultados sobre 500 biopsias. Parte I: PSA. densidad de PSA y PSA predecible. Arch Esp Urol 1997;50:333-338.
6. Mayayo T, Rodríguez-Patrón R, Lennie A. Arias F, Carrera C, Garcia R. Biopsia transrectal ecodirigida. Análisis de los resultados de una serie de 1900 pacientes. Arch Esp Urol 1999;52:453-463.
7. O'dowd GJ, Miller MC, Orozco R, Veltri RW. Analysis of repeated biopsy results within 1 year after a noncancer diagnosis. Urology 2000;55(4):553-559.
8. Orozco R. O'dowd GJ, Kunnel B, Miller MC, Veltri RW. Observations on pathology trends in 62,537 prostate biopsies obtained from urology private practices in the United States. Urology 1998;51(3):186-195.
9. Roehl KA, Antenor JA, Catalona WJ. Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study. J Urol 2002:167(6):2435-2439.
10. Frauscher F, Klauser A. Volgger H, Halpern EJ, Pallwein L, Steiner H et al. Comparison of contrast enhanced color doppler targeted biopsy with conventional systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection. J Urol 2002; 167(4):1648-1652.
11. Wills ML, Hamper UM, Partin AW, Epstein JI. Incidence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in sextant needle biopsy specimens. Urology 1997:49(3):367-373.
12. Morote Robles J. López López M, Encabo Duro G, De Torres Ramírez I. Incidencia de las lesiones asociadas en la biopsia prostática y su influencia en la concentración sérica del antigeno, prostático específico. Actas Urol Esp 1999; 23(6):400-405.
13. Meng MV, Shinohara K, Grossfeld GD. Significance of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate biopsy. Urol Oncol 2003;21(2):145-151.
14. Steiner MS. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a disease. Curr Urol Rep 2001;2:195-198.
15. Fleshner NE, O'sullivan M. Fair WR. Prevalence and predictors of a positive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol 1997; 158:505-508.
16. García González R, Mayayo T. Lennie A. Rodríguez-Patrón R. Cuesta C. Repetición de la biopsia prostática ecodirigida para la detección de cáncer. Estudio de una serie de 192 pacientes re-biosiados. Actas Urol Esp 2000;24(8): 644-651.
17. Chan TY, Epstein JI. Follow-up of atypical prostate needle biopsies suspicious for cancer. Urology 1999;53:351-355.
18. Park S, Shinohara K, Grossfeld GD, Carroll PR. Prostate cancer detection in men with prior high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical prostate biopsy. J Urol 2001;165(5):1409-1414.
19. Renshaw AA. Santis WF, Richie JP. Clinicopathological characteristics of prostatic adenocarcinoma in men with atypical prostate needle biopsies. J Urol 1998;159(6): 2018-2021.
20. Weinstein MH, Epstein JI. Significance of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy. Hum Pathol 1993;24(6):624-629.
21. Kamoi K, Troncoso P, Babaian RJ. Strategy for repeat biopsy in patients with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. J Urol 2000; 163(3):819-823.
22. Allen EA, Kahane H. Epstein JI. Repeat biopsy strategies for men with atypical diagnoses on initial prostate needle biopsy. Urology 1998;52(5):803-807.
23. Lofkowitz GK, Taneja SS, Brown J, Melamed J, Lepor H. Follow-up interval prostate biopsy 3 years after diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is associated with high likelihood of prostate cancer, independent of change in prostate specific antigen levels. J Urol 2002;168 (4 Pt 1):1415-1418.
24. Presti JC Jr, O'dowd GJ, Miller MC, Mattu R, Veltri RW. Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study. J Urol 2003;169(1):125-129.
25. Rodríguez Duarte C. Biopsia prostática, multifragmentaria. Arch Esp Urol 2002;55:907-914.
26. Rodríguez-Patrón R, Mayayo T, Alonso M, Burgos FJ, Garcia R, Lennie A. Rentabilidad de la biopsia ampliada con 10 muestras prostáticas. Estudio prospectivo sobre 222 pacientes. Arch Esp Urol (en prensa).
27. Ukimura O, Durrani O, Babaian RJ. Role of PSA and its indices in determining the need for repeat prostate biopsies. Urology 1997;50(1):66-72.
28. Valer J, Agüera L, Adot JM, Virseda M, Marcos J, Gómez A et al. Parámetros clínicos y analíticos que indicarían la realización de una segunda biopsia en pacientes con PSA elevado y biopsia previa negativa. Actas Urol Esp 2002; 26(3):196-203.
29. Gil Martínez P, Allepuz C, Gil MJ, Oliva J, Andrés V, Valdivia P et al. Rebiopsia de próstata. factores pronósticos del resultado anatomopatológico. Actas Urol Esp, 2000;25(5):560-567.
30. Moore CK. Karikehalli S. Nazeer T. Fisher HA. Kaufman RP Jr. Mian BM. Prognostic significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation in the contemporary era. J Urol 2005;173(1):70-72.
31. Bishara T, Ramnani D, Epstein JI. High grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia on needle biopsy. Risk of cancer on repeat biopsy related to number of involved cores and morphologic pattern. Am J Surg Pathol 2004:28(5):629-633.