Analysis of a textual entailer

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3878 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 287-298

  Rus, Vasile ^a   McCarthy, Philip M ^b   Graesser, Arthur C ^b  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

^b University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; DECISION THEORY; INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

ENTAILMENT DECISIONS; LEMMATIZATION; LEXICAL INFORMATION; TEXTUAL ENTAILERS;

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

EID: 33745527163     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11671299_30     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Charniak, E. A Maximum-Entropy-Inspired Parser, Proceedings of the North-American Chapter of Association for Computational Linguistics, 2000, Seattle, WA, United States.
2. Graesser, A.C. and VanLehn, K. and Rose, C. and Jordan, P., and Harter, D. Intelligent tutoring systems with conversational dialogue, AI Magazine, 2001, volume 22, pages 39-51
3. Graesser, A.C. and Lu, S. and Jackson, G.T. and Mitchell and H. and Ventura, M. and Olney, A., and Louwerse, M.M. AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language, Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 2004, pages 180-193
4. Marcus, M.P., Santorini, B., Marcinkiewicz, M.A. Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank, Computational Linguistics, 19-2, pages 313-330.
5. Magerman, D.M. Natural Language Parsing as Statistical Pattern Recognition, PhD Thesis, Stanford University, February, 1994
6. Miller, G. WordNet: a lexical database for English, Communications of the ACM, 1995, volume 38, number 11, pages 39-41
7. Dagan, I., Glickman, O., Magnini, B. The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge Proceedings of the Recognizing Textual Entaiment Challenge Workshop, 2005, Southampton, U.K., April 11-13
8. Rus, V., Graesser, A., Desai, K. Lexico-Syntactic Subsumption for Textual Entailment, Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP), Borovets, Bulgaria, September 17-19, 2005
9. Rus, V., Hempelmann, C. Across-Genre and Empirical Evaluation of State-of-the-Art Treebank-style ParsersProceedings of the 2nd Language Technologies Conference, Poznan, Poland, April 21-23, 2005,
10. Bies, A., Ferguson, M., Katz, K., MacIntyre, R. Bracketing Guidelines for Treebank II Style. Penn Treebank Project.
11. Vanderwende, L., Coughlin, D., Dolan, B. What Syntax can Contribute in Entailment Task Proceedings of the Recognizing Textual Entaiment Challenge Workshop, 2005, Southampton, U.K., April 11-13
12. Bar-Haim, R., Szpektor, I., Glickman, O. Definition and Analysis of Intermediate Entailment Levels Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment, 43rd Annual Meeting of The Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005, July 25-30, Ann Arbor, MI