Sexual dimorphism in the postcranial skeleton of protoceratopsids (neoceratopsia, protoceratopsidae) from Mongolia

Paleontological Journal

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 415-425

  Tereshchenko, V S ^a  

^a PALEONTOLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745515440     PISSN: 00310301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Barbadillo, L.J. and Sanz, J.L., Analisis osteometrico de las regiones Sacra y Presacra de la columna vertébral en los Lagartos Ibericos Lacerta viridis Laurenti, Lacerta lepida Daudin y Lacerta schreberi Bedriage, \nAmphibia-Reptilia, 1983, vol. 4, nos. 2-3, pp. 215-239.
2. Bauwens, D., Barbadillo, J., and Gonzalez, D., Sexual Dimorphism in Body and Abdomen Size in Lacertid Lizards: A Test of the "Fecundity Advantage" Hypothesis, Third World Congr. Herpetology, August 2-10, 1997, Prague, 1997, p. 17.
3. Bogert, C.M., Snakes of the Genera Diaphorolepis and the Colubrid Subfamily Xenoderminae, Senc. Biol., 1964, vol. 5, nos. 3-5, pp. 509-531.
4. Brown, B. and Schlaikjer, E.M., The Structure and Relationship of Protoceratops, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sei., 1940, vol. 40, art. 3, pp. 133-265.
5. Brown, B. and Schlaikjer, E.M., The Skeleton of Leptoceratops with the Description of a New Species, Am. Mus. Novit., 1942, no. 1169, pp. 1-15.
6. Carpenter, K., Variation in Tyrannosaunis rex, in Dinosaur Systematics: Approaches and Perspectives, Carpenter, K. and Currie, P.J., Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990, pp. 141-145.
7. Carrol], R.L., Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution, New York: Freeman and Co., 1988, vol. 2.
8. Chapman, R.E., Shape Analysis in the Study of Dinosaur Morphology, Dinosaur Systematics: Approaches and Perspectives, Carpenter, K. and Currie, P.J., Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990, pp. 21-42.
9. Chinnery, B.J. and Weishampel, D.B., Montanoceratops cerorhynchus (Dinosauria: Ceratopsia) and Relationships among Basal Neoceratopsia, J. Vertebr. Paleontol., 1998, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 569-585.
10. Darevskii, I.I., Skal'nye yashcheritsy Kavkaza (The Rocky Lizards of the Caucasus), Leningrad: Nauka, 1962.
11. Darevskii, I.I., The Study on Functional Features of Reptile Squamosal Cover, in Sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya morfologii (Materialy k Vsesoyuvwmu soveshchaniyu) (State and Prospects of the Development of Morphology: Materials to All-Union Conf.), Moscow: Nauka, 1979, pp. 182-185.
12. Davitashvili, L.Sh., Teoriya polovogo otbora (The Theory of Sexual Selection), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1961.
13. Dement'ev, O.P., Rukovodstvo po zoologii (Handbook on Zoology), vol. 6: Pozvonochnye, ptitsy (Vertebrates, Birds), Leningrad: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1940.
14. Dodson, P., Quantitative Aspects of Relative Growth and Sexual Dimorphism in Protoceratops, J. Paleontol., 1976, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 929-940.
15. Farlow, J.O., Dodson, P., and Chinsamy, A., Dinosaur Biology, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1995, vol. 26, pp. 445-471.
16. Foley, R., Another Unique Species: Patterns in Human Evolutionary Ecology, London: Longman Sei. Tech., 1987.
17. Geodakyan, V.A., Evolutionary Theory for Sex, Priroda (Moscow), 1991, no. 8, pp. 60-69.
18. Gregory, W.K. and Mook, C.C., On Protoceratops, a Primitive Ceratopsian Dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of Mongolia, Am. Mus. Novlt., 1925, no. 156, pp. 1-9.
19. Gurtovoi, N.N. and Dzerzhinsky, F.Ya., Practicheskaya zootomiya poivonochnykh (ptitsy, mlekopitayushchie) (Practical Vertebrate Zootomy: Birds and Mammals), Moscow: Vyssh. Shkola, 1992.
20. Gurtovoi, N.N., Matveev, B.S., and Dzerzhinsky, F.Ya., Practicheskaya zootomiya pozvonochnykh (zenmovodnye, presmykayushchiesya) (Practical Vertebrate Zootomy: Amphibian and Reptiles), Moscow: Vyssh. Shkola, 1978.
21. Hoffshtetter, R. and Gase, J.-P., Vertebrae and Ribs of Modern Reptiles, in Biology of the Reptilla, vol. 1: Morphology A, Gans, C., Bellairs, A. d'A., and Parsons, T.S., Eds., LondonNew York, 1969, pp. 201-335.
22. Kamalova, Z.Ya., Age Structure in a Population of Lizards of the Family Agamidae from Central Asia, in Voprosy gerpetologii. Avtoreferaty dokladov (Questions of Herpetology: Abstracts), Leningrad: Nauka, 1971, pp. 107-108.
23. Klimov, A.F., Anatomiya domashnikh zhivotnykh (Anatomy of Domestic Animals), Moscow: Gos. Sel'khoz. Lit., 1950, vol. 1.
24. Kurzanov, S.M., On Sexual Dimorphism in Protoceratopses, Paleontol. Zh., 1972, no. 1, pp. 104-112.
25. Kurzanov, S.M., A Giant Protoceratopsid from the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia, Paleontol. Zh., 1992, no. 3, pp. 81-93.
26. Lull, R.S., A Revision of the Ceratopsia or Horned Dinosaurs, Mein. Peabody Mus. Natur. Hist., New Haven. Conn., 1933, vol. 3, part 3, pp. 1-175.
27. Maryanska, T. and Osmolska, H., Protoceratopsidae (Dinosauria) of Asia, Palaeontol. Pol., 1975, no. 33, pp. 133-182.
28. Norell, M.A., Gaffney, E.S., Dingus, L.A., and Peter, N., How Fast Did Dinosaurs Grow?, in Discovering Dinosaurs: Nevraitmont Book, 1995, pp. 55-57.
29. Nopcsa, F., Sexual Difference in Ornithipodous Dinosaurs, Paleobiology, 1929, vol. 11, nos. 4-5, pp. 187-210.
30. Osborn, H.E. and Mook, C.C., Camarasaurus, Amphicoelias, and Other Sauropods of Cope, Mem. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 1921, vol. 3, pp. 247-387.
31. Porkert, Ya. and Grosseova, M., On Certain Interspecific and Sexual Distinctions in the Skeleton Proportions of the Lizards Lacerta agilis agilis L. and Lacerta viridis viridis Laur., Tr. Zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR (Leningrad), 1984, vol. 124, pp. 119-23.
32. Raath, M.A., Morphological Variation in Small Theropods and Its Meaning in Systematics: Evidence from Syntarsus rhodesiensis, in Dinosaur Systematics: Approaches and Perspectives, Carpenter, K. and Currie, P.J., Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990, pp. 91-105.
33. Rozhjtestvensky, A.K., Age Variation and Certain Questions "o'f the Taxonomy of Dinosaurs from Asia, Paleontol. Zh., 1965, no. 3, pp. 95-109.
34. Russell, L.S., Musculature and Function in the Ceratopsia, Bull. Nat. Mus. Canada, 1935, no. 77, pp. 39-48.
35. Russell, D.A., A Skeletal Reconstruction of Leptoceratops gracilis from the Upper Edmonton Formation (Cretaceous) of Alberta, Canad. J. Earth Sei., 1970, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 181-184.
36. Schmalhausen, I.I., The Significance of Correlation in Animals' Evolution, Tr. lust. Evol. Morfol., 1939, vol. 1, pp. 175-230.
37. Schmalhausen, I.I., Faktory evolyutsii (teoriya stabiliziruyushchego otbora) (Factors of Evolution: The Theory for Stabilizing Selection), Moscow: Nauka, 1968.
38. Schmalhausen, I.I., Organizni kak tseloe v individual'nom istoricheskom razvitii (The Organism as a Whole in Individual and Historical Development), Moscow: Nauka, 1982.
39. Schmalhausen, I.I., Pull i zakonomemosti evolyutsionnogo protsessa (Ways and Patterns of the Evolutionary Process), Moscow: Nauka, 1983.
40. Schmalhausen, I.I., Rost i differentsirovka (Growth and Differentiation), Kiev: Nauk. Dumka, 1984, vol. 2.
41. Sergeev, A.M., The Materials on Postembryonic Growth of Reptiles, ZooJ. Z/i. (Moscow), 1939, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 888-903.
42. Severtsov, A.N., Morfologicheskie zakonomemosti evolyutsii (Morphological Patterns of Evolution), Moscow-Leningrad: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1939.
43. Severtsov, A.N., Modern Questions of the Evolutionary Theory, in Sobranie sochinenii (Collected Works), MoscowLeningrad: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1945, vol. 3, pp. 217-282.
44. Shell, A.F., Obshchaya biologiya (General Biology), Moscow-Leningrad: Medgiz., 1933, vol. 1.
45. Slijper, E.J., Comparative Biologic-Anatomical Investigation on the Vertebral Column and Spinal Musculature of Mammals, Verhandl. Koninkl. Ned. Akad. Wetens., 1946, sec. 2, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1-128.
46. Sokolov, I.I., Postcranial Skeleton of the Genus Bison, Tr. ZooJ. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR (Leningrad), 1971, vol. 48, pp. 198-219.
47. Sternberg, C.M., Complete Skeleton of Leptoceratops gracilis Brown from the Upper Edmonton Member on Red Deer River, Alberta, Bull. Nat. Mus. Canada, 1951, no. 123, pp. 225-255.
48. Stromer, E., Ergebnisse der Forschungsreisen Prof. E. Stromer in den Wüsten Ägyptens: II. Wirbeltier-Reste der Baharije. Stufe (unterstes Canoman). Das Original des Theropoden Spinosaurus aegypticus nov. gen., nov. sp., Abhandl. Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wissensch., Math. Phys. KL, 1915, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1-195.
49. Tereshchenko, V.S., Sexual Dimorphism in Postcranial Skeletons of Some Agamids, in Paleontologiya. Materialy nauchnogo zasedaniya sektsii paleontologii Mask. O-va. Ispyt. Prir. za 1977-1978 (Paleontology: Sei. Session of Paleontol. Sec., Moscow Soc. Nature Exploration, 1977-1978), Moscow: Nauka, 1980, pp. 97-98.
50. Tereshchenko, V.S., Sexual Dimorphism in Postcranial Skeletons of Lizards of the Family Agamidae (Lacertilia), ZooJ. Zh. (Moscow), 1991a, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 91-103.
51. Tereshchenko, V.S., To the Reconstruction of Protoceratops Vertebral Column,' Paleontol. Zh., 1991b, no. 2, pp. 86-96.
52. Tereshchenko, V.S., Sexual Dimorphism of the Postcranial Skeleton in a Primitive Ceratopsian Dinosaur, Protoceratops andrewsi, in Third World Congr. Herpetol., August 2-10, 1997, Prague, 1997, p. 207.
53. Vorob'ev, V.P., Anatorniya cheloveka (Human Anatomy), Moscow: Medgiz, 1932.
54. White, T.E., Osteology of Seymouria baylorensis Broili, Bull. Mus. Compar. ZooJ., 1939, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 325-409.
55. Wilson, J.A., A Nomenclature for Vertebral Laminae in Sauropods and Other Saurischian Dinosaurs, J. Vertebr. Paleontol., 1999, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 639-653.