Systematics of Cloiselia (Asteraceae, Mutisieae s.l.), a reinstated Madagascan genus

Systematic Botany

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 421-431

  Ortiz, Santiago ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Comparative morphology; Dicoma; Morphology new species; Paraphyly; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

ASTERACEAE; DICOMA; MUTISIEAE;

EID: 33745506636     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 03636445     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364406777585892     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. BREMER, K. 1994. Asteraceae. Cladistics & classification. Portland: Timber Press.
2. CARLQUIST, S. 1957. Anatomy of Guayana Mutisieae. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 9: 441-476.
3. DORMER, K. J. 1962. The fibrous layer in the anthers of Compositae. New Phytologist 61: 150-153.
4. FUNK, V. A., R. J. BAYER, S. KEELEY, R. CHAN, L. WATSON, B. GEMEINHOLZER, E. SCHILLING, J. L. PANERO, B. G. BALDWIN, N. T. GARCIA-JACAS, A. SUSANNA, and R. K. JANSEN. 2005. Everywhere but Antarctica: Using a supertree to understand the diversity and distribution of the Compositae in: Proceedings of a Symposium on Plant Diversity and Complexity Patterns - Local, Regional and Global Dimensions, eds. I. Friis and H. Balslev. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters.
5. GRAU, J. 1980. Die Testa der Mutisieae und ihre systematische Bedeutung. Mitteilungen (aus) der Botanischen Staatssammlung München 16: 269-332.
6. HUMBERT, H. 1923. Les Composées de Madagascar. Mémoires de la société linnéene de Normandie. Botanique 25: 1-334.
7. _. 1963. Flore de Madagascar et des Comores. Plantes vasculaires. Famille 189. Composées. Vol. 2. Paris.
8. KARIS, P. O., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, and K. BREMER. 1992. Phylogenetic analysis of the Cichorioideae (Asteraceae), with emphasis on the Mutisieae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 416-427.
9. KIM, H.-G., S. C. KEELEY, P. S. VROOM, and R. K. JANSEN. 1998. Molecular evidence for an African origin of the Hawaiian endemic Hesperomannia (Asteraceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95: 15440-15445.
10. _, D. J. LOCKERMAN, and R. K. JANSEN. 2002. Systematic implications of ndhF sequence variation in the Mutisieae (Asteraceae). Systematic Botany 27: 598-609.
11. MOORE, S. 1906. Alabastra Diversa.-Part XIII. Journal of Botany (London) 44: 145-154.
12. ORTIZ, S. 2000. A phylogenetic analysis of Dicoma Cass. and related genera (Asteraceae: Cichorioideae: Mutisieae) based on morphological and anatomic characters. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87: 459-481.
13. _. 2001 The reinstatement of the genus Macledium Cass. (Asteraceae, Mutisieae): morphological and phylogenetic arguments. Taxon 50: 733-744.
14. _ and A. P. COUTINHO. 2001. Achyrothalamus reduced to Erythrocephalum (Asteraceae, Mutisieae). Taxon 50: 389-403.
15. PANERO, J. L. and V. A. FUNK. 2002. Toward a phylogenetic subfamilial classification for the Compositae (Asteraceae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 115: 909-922.
16. PRUSKI, J. F. 1989. Compositae of the Guayana Highland, II: novelties in Gongylolepis and Stenopadus (Mutisieae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 76: 993-1003.
17. _. 1997. Asteraceae. Pp. 177-774 in Flora of the Venezuelan Guayana, eds. J. A. Steyermark, P. E. Berry and B. K. Holst. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
18. _. 2004. Missouri Botanical Garden, Research; Asteraceae (Compositae). St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.