Utility of 16-MDCT angiography for comprehensive preoperative vascular evaluation of laparoscopic renal donors

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 186, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1630-1638

  Raman, Steven S ^a   Pojchamarnwiputh, Suwalee ^a,b   Muangsomboon, Kobkun ^a,c   Schulam, Peter G ^d   Gritsch, H Albin ^d   Lu, David S K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Faculty of Pharmacy   (Thailand)

^c MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Angiography; CT; CT imaging; Kidney; MDCT; Renal transplantation

Indexed keywords

IOHEXOL; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BOLUS INJECTION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEM; KIDNEY ANGIOGRAPHY; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; KIDNEY VEIN; LAPAROSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NEPHRECTOMY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENAL ARTERY; SURGICAL ANATOMY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ADOLESCENT; ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; LIVING DONOR; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RENAL ARTERY; RENAL VEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33745502695     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.0983     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ramer LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1995; 60:1047-1049
2. Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surgery 1997; 226:483-490
3. Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Schulam PG, Bender JS, Magnuson TH, Montgomery R. Comparison of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy versus the standard open approach. Transplant Proc 1997; 29:138-139
4. Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Sroka M, et al. Laparoscopic assisted live donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the open approach. Transplantation 1997; 63:229-233
5. Fabrizio MD, Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: pro. Urology 1999; 53:665-667
6. Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. A review of the first 5 years. Urol Clin North Am 2001; 28:709-719
7. Hsu TH, Su LM, Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR. Renovascular complications of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology 2002; 60:811-815
8. Gritsch HA, Smith CV, Rajfer J, et al. Kidney transplantation at UCLA. Clin Transpl 2002; 137-142
9. Brook NR, Nicholson ML. An audit over 2 years' practice of open and laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy at renal transplant centres in the UK and Ireland. BJU Int 2004; 93:1027-1031
10. Satyapal KS. The renal veins: a review. Eur J Anat 2003; 7:43-52
11. Rubin GD, Alfrey EJ, Date MD, et al. Assessment of living renal donors with spiral CT. Radiology 1995; 195:457-462
12. Cochran ST, Krasny RM, Danovitch GM, et al. Helical CT: angiography for examination of living renal donors. AJR 1997; 168:1569-1573
13. Platt JF, Ellis JH, Korobkin M, Reige K. Helical CT. evaluation of potential kidney donors - findings in 154 subjects. AJR 1997; 169:1325-330
14. Pozniak MA, Balison DJ, Lee FT Jr, Tambeaux RH, Uehling DT, Moon TD. CT angiography of potential renal transplant donors. RadioGraphics 1998; 18:565-587
15. Del Pizzo JJ, Sklar GN, You-Cheong JW, Levin B, Krebs T, Jacobs SC. Helical computerized tomography arteriography for evaluation of live renal donors undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 1999; 162:31-34
16. Smith PA, Ratner LE, Lynch FC, Corl FM, Fishman EK. Role of CT angiography in the preoperative evaluation for laparoscopic nephrectomy. RadioGraphics 1998; 18:589-601
17. Rydberg J, Kopecky KK, Tann M, et al. Evaluation of prospective living renal donors for laparoscopic nephrectomy with multisection CT: the marriage of minimally invasive imaging with minimally invasive surgery. RadioGraphics 2001; 21(special issue):S223-S236
18. Patil U, Ragavan A, Nadaraj, et al. Helical CT angiography in evaluation of liver kidney donors. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16:1900-1904
19. Scatarige JC, Horton KM, Ramer LE, Fishman EK. Left adrenal vein localization by 3D real-time volume-rendering CTA before laparoscopic nephrectomy in living renal donors. Abdom Imaging 2001; 26:553-556
20. Tran T, Heneghan JP, Paulson EK. Preoperative evaluation of potential renal donors using multidetector CT. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27:620-625
21. Kim JK, Park SY, Kim HJ, et al. Living donor kidneys: usefulness of multi-detector row CT for comprehensive evaluation. Radiology 2003; 229:869-876
22. Kawamoto S, Montgomery RA, Lawler LP, Horton KM, Fishman EK. Multidetector CT angiography for preoperative evaluation of living laparoscopic renal donors. AJR 2003; 180:1633-1638
23. Sahani DV, Rastogi N, Greenfield AC, et al. Multidetector row CT in evaluation of 94 living renal donors by readers with varied experience. Radiology 2005; 235:905-910
24. Kawamoto S, Lawler LP, Fishman EK. Evaluation of the renal venous system on late arterial and venous phase images with MDCT angiography in potential living laparoscopic renal donors. AJR 2005; 184:539-545
25. Johnson JE, Loveday EJ, Archer LJ, et al. Preoperative evaluation of live renal donors using multislice CT angiography. Clin Radiol 2005; 60:771-777
26. Kawamoto S, Montgomery RA, Lawler LP, Horton KM, Fishman EK. Multi-detector row CT evaluation of living renal donors prior to laparoscopic nephrectomy. RadioGraphics 2004; 24:453-466
27. Murray JE, Harrison JH. Surgical management of 50 patients with kidney transplant including 18 pairs of twins. Am J Surgery 1963; 105:205-218
28. Mandal AK, Cohen C, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR, Ratner LE. Should the indications for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy of the right kidney be the same as for the open procedure? Anomalous left renal vasculature is not a contraindication to laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2001; 71:660-664
29. Ratner LE, Smith P, Montgomery RA, Mandal AK, Fabrizio M, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: pre-operative assessment of technical difficulty. Clin Transplant 2000; 14:427-432
30. Troppmann C, Wiesmann K, McVicar JP, Wolfe BM, Perez RV. Increased transplantation of kidneys with multiple renal arteries in the laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy era: surgical technique and surgical and nonsurgical donor and recipient outcomes. Arch Surgery 2001; 136:897-907
31. Lin H, Steinberg AP, Ramani AP, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in the presence of circumaortic or retroaortic left renal vein. J Urol 2004; 171:44-46
32. Hsu TH, Su LM, Ratner LE, Track BJ, Kavoussi LR. Impact of renal artery multiplicity on outcomes of renal donors and recipients in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology 2003; 61:323-327
33. Baniel J, Foster RS, Donohue JP. Surgical anatomy of the lumbar vessels: implications for retroperitoneal surgery. J Urol 1995; 153:1422-1425