Adhesion properties of indigenous dadih lactic acid bacteria on human intestinal mucosal surface

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 751-755

  Dharmawan, Jorry ^a,b   Surono, Ingrid S ^a,c   Kun, Lee Yuan ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c AGENCY FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND APPLICATION OF TECHNOLOGY BPPT   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Caco 2 Cells; Dadih; Lactic Acid Bacteria; Mucin; Probiotics

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ESCHERICHIA COLI; LACTOBACILLUS CASEI; LACTOBACILLUS REUTERI; LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS;

EID: 33745500674     PISSN: 10112367     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2006.751     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Beachcy, E. H. 1981. Bacterial adherence: adhesion-receptor interactions mediating the attachment of bacteria to mucosal surfaces. J. Infect. Dis. 143:325-345.
2. Bibiloni, R., P. F. Pérez and G. L. De Antoni. 1999. Will a high adhering capacity in a probiotic strain guarantee exclusion of pathogens from intestinal epithelia? Anaerobe 5:519-524.
3. Hosono, A., R. Wardojo and H. Otani. 1990. Binding of amino acid pyrolyzates by lactic acid bacteria isolated from dadih. Lebensm-Wiss. Technol. 23:149-153.
4. Kaur, I. P., K. Chopra and A. Saini. 2002. Probiotics: potential pharmaceutical applications. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 15:1-9.
5. Kirjavainen, P. V., A. C. Ouwehand, E. Isolauri and S. J. Salminen. 1998. The ability of probiotic bacteria to bind to human intestinal mucus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 167:185-189.
6. Ouwehand, A. C., P. V. Kirjavainen, C. Shortt and S. J. Salminen. 1999. Probiotics: mechanisms and established effects. Int. Dairy J. 9:43-52.
7. Ouwehand, A. C., S. J. Salminen and E. Isolauri. 2002. Probiotics: an overview of beneficial effects. Anton. Leeuw. Int. J. G. 82:279-289.
8. Pato, U., I. S. Surono, Koesnandar and A. Hosono. 2004. Hypocholesterolemic effect of indigenous dadih lactic acid bacteria by deconjugation of bile salts. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:1741-1745.
9. Saarela, M., G. Mogensen, R. Fondén, J. Mättö and T. Mattila-Sandholm. 2000. Probiotic bacteria: safety, functional and technological properties. J. Biotechnol. 84:197-215.
10. Saarela, M., L. Lähteenmäki, R. Crittenden, S. J. Salminen and T. Mattila-Sandholm. 2002. Gut bacteria and health foods-the european perspective. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 78:99-117.
11. Salminen, S. J., E. Isolauri and E. Salminen. 1996. Clinical uses of probiotics for stabilizing the gut mucosal barrier: successful strains and future challenges. Anton. Leeuw. Int. J. G. 70:347-358.
12. Salminen, S. J., A. C. Ouwehand and E. Isolauri. 1998. Clinical applications of probiotic bacteria. Int. Dairy J. 8:563-572.
13. Salminen, S. J., A. C. Ouwehand, Y. Benno and Y. K. Lee. 1999. Probiotics: how should they be defined? Trends Food Sci. Tech. 10:107-110.
14. Surono, I. S. and A. Hosono. 1996. Antimutagenicity of milk cultured with lactic acid bacteria from dadih against mutagenic terasi. Milchwissenschaft 51:493-497.
15. Surono, I. S. 2003. In vitro probiotic properties of indigenous dadih lactic acid bacteria. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:726-731.
16. Tuomola, E. M., A. C. Ouwehand and S. J. Salminen. 1999. The effect of probiotic bacteria on the adhesion of pathogens to human intestinal mucus. FEMS Immunol. Med. Mic. 26:137-142.