Relation between genotype and temperament of grazing steers on meat quality;Relação entre o genótipo e o temperamento de novilhos em pastejo e seu efeito na qualidade da carne

Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 519-526

  Barbosa Silveira, Isabella Dias ^a   Fischer, Vivian ^a   Dorneles Soares, Germano Jorge ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bovine; Color; pH; Reactivity; Weight gain

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 33745500258     PISSN: 15163598     EISSN: 15163598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982006000200026     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. ABULARACH, M.L.S.; ROCHA, C.E.; FELÍCIO, P.E. Caracterí sticas de qualidade do contrafilé (músculo longissimus dorsi) de touros jovens da raça Nelore. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, v.18, n.2, p.205-210, 1998.
2. AGUILAR, N.M.A.; BALBUENA, O.; PARANHOS DA COSTA, M.J.R. Evaluacion del temperamento em bovinos cruza cebú. In: ENCONTRO ANUAL DE ETOLOGIA - Comportamento e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 22., 2004, Campo Grande. Anais... Campo Grande: Sociedade Brasileira de Etologia/Elohim reproduções, 2004, CD-ROM.
3. ANUALPEC - Anuário Estatístico da Pecuária de Corte. São Paulo. FNP (Consultoria/Agroinformativos), p.77-101, 2003.
4. BARBOSA, I.D.; OSÓRIO, M.T.M.; SOARES, G.J.D Influência da genética de bovinos na velocidade do metabolismo post mortem. Revista Brasileira de Agrociência, v.6, n.3, p.243-247, 2000.
5. BENDALL, J.R. Post mortem changes in muscle. In: BOURNE, G.H. (Ed.) The structure and functions of muscle. 2.ed. New York: Academic Press, 1973. v.2, p.244.
6. BOISSY, A.; BOUISSOU, M. F. Assessment of individual differences in behavioral reactions of heifers exposed to various fear-eliciting situations. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.46, p.17-31, 1995.
7. BORBA, L.H.F.; PIOVESAN, U.; PARANHOS DA COSTA, M.J.R. Uma abordagem preliminar no estudo de associação entre escores de reatividade e características produtivas de bovinos de corte. Anais de Etologia, v.15, p.388, 1997.
8. BROWN, E.G.; CARSTENS, G.E.; FOX, J.T. et al. 2004. Relationships between temperament and performance traits of growing calves. In: Beef Cattle Research in Texas Publication, section Physiology. Disponível em: www.animalscience.tamv.edu/ansc/beef/bcrt/2004/brown>. Acesso em: 12/12/2004
9. BURNS, R. Study shows temperamental cattle eat less, gain less. AgNews Agricultural Communications, v.30, p.45-49, 2003.
10. BURROW, H.M.; SEIFERT, G.W.; COBERT, N.J. A new technique for measuaring temperament in cattle. Australian Society of Animal Production, v.17, p.154-157, 1988.
11. BURROW, H.M. Effect of intensive handling of zebu crossbred weaner calves on temperament. In: CONFERENCE OF THE AUSTRALIAN ASSOCIATION OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 1991, Victoria. Proceedings... Victoria, 1991. v.9, p.208-211.
12. BURROW, H. M.; CORBET, N. J. Genetic and environmental factors affecting temperament of zebu and zebu-derived beef cattle grazed at pasture in the tropics. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, v.51, p.155-162, 2000.
13. BURROW, H.M.; DILLON, R.D. Relationship between temperament and growth in a feedlot and commercial carcass traits of Bos indicus crossbreeds. Australian Journal Experimental Agriculture, v.37, p.407-411, 1997.
14. BUSBY, D. Disposition - convenience trait or economically important. 2004. Disponível em: 〈www.xtension.iastate.Edu/feci/4stbeef/ disposition.pdf〉.Acesso em: 15/12/2004.
15. CHAMPE, P.C.; HARVEY, R.A. Bioquímica ilustrada. 2.ed. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas, 1996. 446p.
16. CURLEY JR., K.O.; NEUENDORFF, D.A.; LEWIS, A.W et al. Evaluation of temperament and stress physiology may be useful in breeding programs. In: Beef Cattle Research in Texas Publication, section Physiology. Disponível em: www.animalscience.tamv.edu/ansc/beef/bcrt/2004/curley〉 Acesso em: 05/01/2005.
17. FELL, L.R.; COLDITZ, I.G.; WALKER, K.H. et al. Associations between temperament, performance and immune function in cattle entering a commercial feedlot. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, v.39, p.795-802, 1999.
18. FORDYCE, G.; DODT, R.M.; WHYTES, J.R. Cattle temperaments in extensive beef herds in northern Queensland - Factors affecting temperament. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture , v.28, p.683-687, 1988.
19. GRANDIN, T. Assessment of stress during handling and transport. Journal of Animal Science, v.75, 249-257, 1997.
20. GRANDIN, T. Behavioral agitation during handling of cattle is persistent over time. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.36, p.1-9, 1993.
21. GRANDIN, T. Livestock handling and transport. Wallingford: CABI Publishing, 2000. p.63-85.
22. GRANDIN, T. Methods to reduce PSE and bloodplash. Allen D. Leman Swine Conference, v.21, p.206-209, 1994.
23. GRANDIN, T.; DEESING, D. Genetics and behavioural of domestic animals. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998. 378p.
24. HOUBEN, J.H.; DIJK, A.; EIKELENBOOM, G. et al. Effect of dietary vitamin E supplementation, fat level and packaging on colour stability and lipid oxidation in minced beef. Meat Science, v.55, p.331-336, 2000.
25. HWANG, I.H.; THOMPSON, J.M. The effect of time and type of electrical stimulation on the calpain system and meat tenderness in beef Longissimus dorsi muscle. Meat Science, v.58, p.135-144, 2001.
26. KILGOUR, R. The open field-test as an assessment of the temperament of dairy cows. Animal Behaviour, v.23, p.615-624, 1998.
27. LAWRIE, R.A. Ciencia de la carne. 3.ed. Zaragoza: Acribia, 1998. 367p.
28. LEHNINGER, A.L. Princípios da bioquímica. 3.ed. São Paulo: Sarvier, 1986. 725p.
29. MOBERG, G.P. Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare. In: MOBERG, G.P.; MENCH, J.A. (Eds.). The biology of animal stress: basic principles and implications for animal welfare. Wallingford: CABI Publishing, 2000. p.1-22,
30. PARANHOS DA COSTA, M.J.R.; PIOVESAN, U.; CYRILLO, J.N. S.G. et al. In: WORLD CONGRESS ON GENETICS APPLIED TO LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION, 7., Montpellier, 2002. Proceedings... Montpellier: INRA, 2002. v.7, p.5.
31. PETHERICK, J.C.; HOLROYD, R.G.; DOOGAN, V.J. et al. Productivity, carcass and meat quality of lot fed Bos indicus cross steers grouped according to temperament. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, v.42, n.4, p.389-398, 2002.
32. PIOVESAN, U. Análise de fatores genéticos e ambientais na reatividade de quatro raças de bovinos de corte ao manejo. Jaboticabal: Universidade Estadual Paulista, 1998. 42p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Zootecnia) - Universidade Estadual Paulista, 1998.
33. PRICE, E.O. Behavioral aspects of animal domestication. Quimical Review Biological, v.59, p.1-32, 1984.
34. ROGAN, M.T.; LeDOUX, J.E. Emotion: Systems, cells and synaptic plasticity. Cell Press, v.85, p.469-475, 1996.
35. STATISTICAL ANALYSES SYSTEM - SAS. SAS/STAT® User's Guide, Version 6, 4.ed., Cary: 1989. v.2, 846p.
36. VOISINET, B.D.; GRANDIN, T.; TATUM, J.D. et al. Feedlot cattle with calm temperaments have higher average daily gains than cattle with excitable temperaments. Journal of Animal Science, v.75, p.892-896, 1997a.
37. VOISINET, B.D.; GRANDIN, T.; O'CONNOR, S.F. et al. Bos indicus-cross feedlot cattle with excitable temperaments have tougher meat and a higher incidence of borderline dark cutters. Meat Science, v.46, p.367-377, 1997b.
38. WULF, D.M.; O'CONNOR, S.F.; TATUM, J.D. et al. Using objective measures of muscle color to predict beef longissimus tenderness. Journal of Animal Science, v.75, p.684-692, 1997.
39. ZAMORA, F.; DEBITONS, E.; LEPETIT, J. et al. Predictions variability of ageing and toughness in beef M. Longissimus lumborum et thoracis. Meat Science, v.43, n.3-4, p.321-333, 1996.
40. ZAVY, M.T.; JUNIEWICZ, P.E.; PHILLIPS, W.A et al. Effect of initial restraint, weaning, and transport stress on baseline and ACTH-stimulated cortisol responses in beef calves of different genotypes. Animal Journal Veterinary Research, v.53, n.4, p.551-557, 1992.