The use of negative pressure for the sinus lift procedure: A technical note

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 455-458

  Suguimoto, Roberto Macoto ^a   Trindade, Ivy Kiemle ^a,b   Carvalho, Roberta Martinelli ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bone transplantation; Sinus augmentation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; MAXILLARY SINUS; METHODOLOGY; PRESSURE;

BONE TRANSPLANTATION; HUMANS; MAXILLARY SINUS; PRESSURE;

EID: 33745495681     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38:613-616.
2. Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30:207-229.
3. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13(suppl):11-45.
4. Shulman LB, Jensen OT. Sinus Graft Consensus Conference. Introduction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13(suppl):5, 6.
5. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: The osteotome technique. Compendium 1994;15:152, 154-156.
6. Betts NJ, Miloro M. Modification of the sinus lift procedure for septa in the maxillary antrum. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52:332, 333.
7. van den Bergh JP, ten Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJ, Tuinzing DB. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:256-265.
8. Froum SJ, Tarnow DP, Wallace SS, Roher MD, Cho SC. Sinus floor elevation using anorganic bovine bone matrix (OsteoGraf/N) with and without autogenous bone: A clinical, histologic, radiographic, and histomorphometric analysis-Part 2 of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18:528-543.
9. Yildirim M, Spiekermann H, Handt S, Edelhoff D. Maxillary sinus augmentation with the xenograft Bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral bone for qualitative improvement of the implant site: A histologic and histomorphometric clinical study in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:23-33.
10. Boeck-Neto RJ, Gabrielli M, Lia R, Marcantonio E, Shibli JA, Marcantonio E Jr. Histomorphometrical analysis of bone formed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation by grafting with a combination of autogenous bone and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft or hydroxyapatite. J Periodontol 2002;73:266-270.
11. Cordioli G, Mazzocco C, Schepers E, Brugnolo E, Majzoub Z. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone with simultaneous implant placement. Clinical and histological findings. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:270-278.
12. Moses JJ, Arredondo A. Sinus lift complications: Avoiding problems and finding solutions. Dent Implantol Update 1997;8:70-72.
13. Bergland O, Semb G, Abyholm FE. Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment. Cleft Palate J 1986;23:175-205.
14. Vlassis JM, Fugazzotto PA. A classification system for sinus membrane perforations during augmentation procedures with options for repair. J Periodontol 1999;70:692-699.
15. Wiltfang J, Schultze-Mosgau S, Merten HA, Kessler P, Ludwig A, Engelke W. Endoscopic and ultrasonographic evaluation of the maxillary sinus after combined sinus floor augmentation and implant insertion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:288-291.