Model-free deconvolution of femtosecond kinetic data

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 110, Issue 19, 2006, Pages 6192-6207

  Bányász, Ákos ^a,b   Keszei, Erno ^a  

^a EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONVOLUTION; DATA REDUCTION; FUNCTIONS; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

DECONVOLUTION; FEMTOSECOND KINETIC DATA; KINETIC CURVES;

LASER PULSES;

EID: 33745490766     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp057486w     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. van Cittert, P. H. Z. Phys. 1931, 69, 298;
2. Burger, H. C.; van Cittert, P. H. Z. Phys. 1933, 81, 428.
3. Paley, R. C.; Wiener, N. Fourier Transforms in the Complex Domain; AMS Colloquium Publications: Providence, RI, 1934; Vol. 19.
4. Press, W. H.; Flannary, B. P.; Teukolsky, S. A.; Vetterling, W. T. Numerical Recipes - The An of Scientific Computing; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1986.
5. Hamming, R. W. Digital Filters, 3rd ed.; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989.
6. See, e.g.: Chase, W. J.; Hunt, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1975, 79, 2835.
7. McKinnon, A. E.; Szabo, A. G.; Miller, D. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1977, 81, 1564.
8. O'Connor, D. V.; Ware, W. R.; André, J. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 1333.
9. See, e.g.: Bernstein, R. B.; Zewail, A. H. Chem. Eng. News 1988 (Nov. 7), 24-43
10. Zewail, A. H. Science 1988, 242, 1645.
11. Zewail, A. H. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 1989, 85, 1221.
12. Simon, J. D., Ed. Ultrafast Dynamics of Chemical Systems; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 1994.
13. Zewail, A. H. J. Phys. Chem. 2000, 104, 5660.
14. Bányász, A.; Mátyus, E.; Keszei, E. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2005, 72, 235.
15. Bányász, A.; Dancs, G.; Keszei, E. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2005, 74, 139.
16. Keszei, E.; Murphrey, T. H.; Rossky, P. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 22.
17. For a mathemathical description, see, e.g.: Zayed, A. I. Handbook of Function and Generalized Function Transformations; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 1996; p 233.
18. Relevant implications are described in the following: Donoho, D. L.; Stark, P. B. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 1989, 49, 906.
19. Henriksen, N. E.; Engel, V. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 10469.
20. See, e.g., p 383 of ref 3.
21. It is appropriate to note here that the width of the effective pulse is at least √2 times that of the pump pulse, as the probe pulse is usually generated from the same initial laser pulse without compression. The group velocity mismatch further increases the temporal width of the effective pulse. To our experience, the effective pulse width is usually close to twice the pump pulse width.
22. Habenicht, A.; Hjelm, J.; Mukhtar, E.; Bergström, F.; Johansson, L. B.-Å. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 354, 367.
23. Jansson, P. A., Ed. Deconvolution of Images and Spectra, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, 1997.
24. Schafer, R. W.; Merserau, R. M.; Richards, M. A. Proc. IEEE 1981, 69, 432.
25. Biemond, J.; Lagendijk, R. L.; Mersereau, R. M. Proc. IEEE 1990, 78, 856.
26. Kawata, S.; Ichioka, Y. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1980, 70, 762.
27. Kawata, S.; Ichioka, Y. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1980, 70, 768.
28. Amini, A. M. Appl. Opt. 1995, 34, 1878.
29. Jansson, P. A.; Hunt, R. H.; Pyler, E. K. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1970, 60, 692.
30. Gold, R. An Iterative Unfolding Method for Response Matrices; AEC Research and Development Report ANL-6984; Argonne National Laboratory: Argonne, IL, 1964.
31. Xu, C.; Aissaoui, L.; Jacquey, S. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1994, 11, 2804.
32. Richardson, W. H. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1972, 62, 55.
33. Kennen, T. J.; Prestwich, W. V.; Robertson, A. Nucl. Instrum. Methods 1978, 151, 285, 293.
34. Prozesky, V. M.; Padayachee, J.; Fischer, R.; Von der Linden, W.; Dose, V.; Ryan, C. G. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 1979, 130, 113.
35. Crilly, P. B. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 1991, 40, 558.
36. Pananakis, D.; Abel, E. W. Thermochim. Acta 1998, 315, 107.
37. André, J. C.; Vincent, L. M.; O'Connor, D.; Ware, W. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 2285.
38. Gobbel, G. T.; Fike, J. R. Phys. Med. Biol. 1994, 39, 1833.
39. Bates, J. H. T. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1991, 38, 1262.
40. Tikhonov, A. N.; Arsenin, V. Y. Solutions of Ill-posed Problems; V. H. Winston & Sons: Washington, DC, 1977.
41. Dabóczi, T.; Kollár, I. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 1996, 45, 417.
42. Madden, F. N.; Godfrey, K. R.; Chappell, M. J.; Hovorka, R.; Bates, A. R. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 1996, 24, 283.
43. Parruck, B.; Riad, S. M. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 1984, 33, 281.
44. Gans, W. L.; Nahman, N. S. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 1982, 31, 97.
45. Waldmeyer, J. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 1980, 29, 36.
46. Marquardt, D. W. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 1963, 11, 431; see also ref 3 of the present paper.
47. Barthel, E. R.; Martini, I. B.; Keszei, E.; Schwanz, B. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 5916.
48. Wang, Z.; Shoshana, O.; Hou, B.; Ruhman, S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 3009.