Fischer's Fused Full Field Digital Mammography and Ultrasound System (FFDMUS)

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 114, Issue , 2005, Pages 177-200

  Suri, Jasjit S ^a,b   Danielson, Tim ^c   Guo, Yujun ^b   Janer, Roman ^c  

^a Fischer Medical Technologies   (United States)

^b KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

breast lesion; full field digital mammography and ultrasound system; Fusion; hand held ultrasound; ultrasound; X ray

Indexed keywords

FUSION REACTIONS; IMAGE QUALITY; MEDICAL IMAGING; ULTRASONIC EQUIPMENT; ULTRASONICS; X RAYS;

ANTERIOR POSTERIORS; BREAST LESION; BREAST LESION DETECTION; FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS; SEGMENTATION SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASOUND SYSTEM;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33745469823     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Service: http://www.4woman.gov/whw
2. Tabar, L., Vitak, B., Chen, H., Yen, M., Duffy, S. W., Smith, R. A., Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer, Vol. 91, No. 9, pp. 1724-31, 2001
3. Tabar, L., Fagerberg, G., Chen, H., Duffy, S. W., Smart, C. R., Gad, A., Smith, R. A., Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results from the Swedish Two-County Trial, Cancer, Vol. 75, No. 10, pp. 2507-17, 1995
4. Nishikawa, R. M., Computer-aided diagnosis complements full-field digital mammography. Diagnostic Imaging (San Franc), Vol. 21, No. 9, pp. 47-51, 1999
5. Warren Burhenne, L. J., Wood, S. A., DOrsi, C. J., Feig, S. A., Kopans, D. B., OShaughnessy, K. F., Sickles, E. A., Tabar, L, Vyborny, C. J., Castellino, R. A., Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology, Vol. 215, No. 2, pp. 554-62, 2000
6. Lewin, J. M., Hendrick, R. E., DOrsi, C. J., Isaacs, P. K., Moss, L. J., Karellas, A., Sisney, G. A., Kuni, C. C., Cutter, G. R., Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology, Vol. 218, No. 3, pp. 873-80, 2001
7. Nass, S. J., Henderson, C., Lashof, J. C., Mammography and Beyond: Developing Technologies for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer, ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 2001
8. Malur, S., Wurdinger, S., Moritz, A., Schneider, A. Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography, Breast Cancer Res., Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 55-60, 2001
9. Kapur, A., Krucker, J., Astley, O., Buckley, D., Eberhard, J., Alyassin, A., Claus, B., Thomenius, K., Myers, H., Rumsey, M., Johnson, R., Karr, S., Fusion of Digital Mammography with Breast Ultrasound - a Phantom Study, In Medical Imaging 2002: Physics of Medical Imaging. San Diego, CA: SPIE. 2002
10. Elbakri, I., Entrekin, R., Coad, C., Danielson, T., Janer, R., Integrated Full-Field Digital Mammography and 3-D Breast Ultrasound System, 46th AAPM Annual Meeting, July 25th - 29th, 2004
11. Elbakri, I., EntrekinR., Coad, C., Danielson, T., Suri, J. S., Janer, R., Integrated X-ray and Ultrasound Breast Imaging Using Fischer Imagings SenoScan Full Field Digital Mammography Scanner, Radiological Society of North America, 2004
12. Suri, J. S., Guo, Y., Coad, C., Elbakri, I., Entrekin, R., Kwan, A., Boone, J., Janer, R., Image Quality Assessment of Fused Full Field Digital Mammography and Ultrasound Imaging System (FFDMUS), Workshop on Alternatives to Mammography, September 18th - 20th, 2004, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
13. http://www.cirsinc.com/productlist.html
14. Tradup, D.J., N.J. Hangiandreou, and J.P. Taubel, Comparison of ultrasound quality assurance phantom measurements from matched and mixed scanner-transducer combinations. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2003. 4(3): p. 239-47
15. Dudley, N.J., et al., A review of two alternative ultrasound quality assurance programmes. Eur J Ultrasound, 2001. 12(3): p. 233-45
16. Kanal, K.M., J.M. Kofler, and D.S. Groth, Comparison of selected ultrasound performance tests with varying overall receiver gain and dynamic range, using conventional and magnified field of view. Med Phys, 1998. 25(5): p. 642-7
17. Burke, E., QA in the vascular ultrasound lab. Radiol Technol, 1996. 67(3): p. 253-6
18. Trier H.G. [Functional properties of diagnostic ultrasound instruments. A concept of trial building blocks for implementing quality assurance]. Ultraschall Med 1994 15(5)223-32.
19. Walker, J.B., G.C. Thorne, and M. Halliwell, Quality assurance of ultrasound imaging instruments by monitoring the monitor. Phys Med Biol, 1993. 38(11): p. 1601-9
20. Evans, J.A., et al., Routine quality assurance of high frequency ultrasound breast scanners in a screening context. Br J Radiol, 1993. 66(787): p. 614-8
21. Metcalfe, S.C. and J.A. Evans, A study of the relationship between routine ultrasound quality assurance parameters and subjective operator image assessment. Br J Radiol, 1992. 65(775): p. 570-5
22. Madsen, E., Zagzebski, J., Frank, G., Rownd, J., Automated system and method for testing resolution of ultrasound scanners. Patent US 5,574,212, 1996
23. Otsu, N., A threshold selection method from gray level histograms. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 9, pp. 62-66, March 1979
24. Haralick, R. M., Shapiro, L., Computer and Robot Vision, Addison-Wesley, 1991
25. H Fujita et al. A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 11(1):34-39, 1992
26. Kass, M., Witkin, A., Terzopoulos, D. Snakes: Active contour models, Int. J. Comput. Vis., Vol. 1, pp. 321-331, 1987
27. Ojala, T., Näppi, J., Nevalainen, O., Accurate segmentation of the breast region from digitized mammograms, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, Vol. 25, pp. 47-59, 2001
28. Wirth, M. A., Stapinski, A., Segmentation of the Breast Region in Mammograms Using Snakes, 1st Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV04), pp. 385-392, 2004
29. Xu, C., Prince, J., Snakes, Shapes, and Gradient Vector Flow, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 359-369, 1998
30. Foley, J. D., Van Dam, A. Feiner, S. K., Hughes, J. F., Computer Graphics in C: Principles and Practice, 2nd edition, Addision-Wesley, 1996
31. Perona, P., Malik, J., Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion, IEEE Trans. In Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 629-639, 1990
32. Suri, J. S., Laxminarayan, S., PDE & Level Sets: Algorithmic Approaches to Static & Motion Imagery, Kluwer Academic /Plenum Publishers, ISBN#: 0-306-46678-3, 2002
33. Suri, J. S., Liu, K., Laxminarayan, S., Zeng, X., Reden, L., Shape Recovery Algorithms Using Level Sets in 2-D/3-D Medical Imagery: A State-of-the Art Review, IEEE Trans. Info. Tech. in Biomedicine, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 8-28, 2002
34. Suri, J. S., Wu, D., Reden, L., Gao, J., Singh, S., Laxminarayan, S., Modeling Segmentation via Geometric Deformable Regularizers, PDE and Level Sets in Still and Motion Imagery: A Revisit, International Journal of Image and Graphics, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 681-734, 2001
35. Suri, J. S., Guo, Y., Danielson, T., Janer, R., Effect of PDE-based Noise Removal on GVF-based Deformation Model on Lesion Detection in Breast Phantom X-ray Images from Fischers Fused FFDM and Ultrasound (FFDMUS) Imaging System, Accepted by SPIE 2005
36. Maes, F., Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., Marchal, G., Suetens, P., Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 187-198, 1997
37. Wells, W., Viola, P., Atsumi, H., Nakajima, S., Kikinis, R., Multimodal volume registration by maximization of mutual information, Medical Image Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 35-51, 1996
38. Studholme, C., Hill, D., Hawkes, D., An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3d medical image alignment, Pattern Recognition, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 71-86, 1999
39. Brown, L. G., A survey of image registration techniques, ACM Comput. Surv., Vol. 24, pp. 325-376, Dec. 1992
40. Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., Numerical Recipes in C, Cambridge University Press, 1988
41. Studholme, C., Hill, D., Hawkes, D., Automated 3D registration of MR and PET brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures, Medical Physics, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 25-36, 1997
42. Maes, F., Vandermeulen, D., Suetens, P., Comparative evaluation of multi-resolution optimization strategies for multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information, Medical Image Analysis., Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 373-386, 1999
43. Pluim, J., Maintz, J., Viergever, M., A multiscale approach to mutual information matching, Medical Imaging 1998: Image Processing, SPIE Vol. 3338, pp. 1334-1344, 1998
44. Lester, H., Arridge, S. R., A survey of hierarchical non-linear medical image registration, Pattern Recogn., Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 129-149, 1999