Merit rating and formula-based resource allocation

International Journal of Educational Management

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 95-100

  Alho, Juha M ^a   Salo, Mikko A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Funding; Hierarchy; Models; Universities

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745443164     PISSN: 0951354X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09513540010322366     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Alho, J. (1996), “Stokastiset tutkintomarkkinat”, in Ahponen, P. (Ed.), Yhteisellä asialla - monella äänellä, Studies in Social Policy, No. 4, University of Joensuu.
2. Caudle, S.L. and Newcomer, K.E. (1987), “Grant allocation decision rules: expectations versus realities”, Evaluation Review, Vol. 10 No. 6, pp. 860-79.
3. Feller, W. (1968), An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Wiley, New York, NY.
4. Fisher, R.C. (1996), State and Local Public Finance, Irwin, Chicago, IL, pp. 503-17.
5. Hölttä, S. (1995), Towards the Self-Regulative University, University of Joensuu Publications in Social Sciences, No. 23, University of Joensuu, Joensuu.
6. Huffman, W.E. and Just, R.E. (1994), “Funding, structure, and management of public agricultural research in the United States”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 76 No. 4, pp. 744-59.
7. Johnes, G. (1996), “The British experience of reform in education”, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 125-37.
8. Massy, W.F. (1994), Resource Allocation Reform in Higher Education, National Association of College and University Business Officers, Washington, DC.
9. Mayston, D.J. (1998), “Devolved budgeting, formula funding and equity”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 9, pp. 37-54.
10. Musgrave, R.A. and Musgrave, P.B. (1989), Public Finance in Theory and Practice, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, pp. 29-31.
11. Nagel, S.S. (1988), Policy Studies – Integration and Evaluation, Greenwood Press, New York, NY.
12. Roy, R. (1985), “Funding science: the real defects of peer review and an alternative to it”, Science, Technology, Human Values, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 73-81.
13. Serban, A.M. and Burke, J.C. (1998), “Meeting the performance funding challenge”, Public Productivity and Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 157-76.
14. Spencer, B.D. (1980), Benefit-Cost Analysis of Data Used to Allocate Funds, Springer, New York, NY.
15. Spencer, B.D. (1982), “Technical issues in allocation formula design”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 42, pp. 524-9.
16. Young, H.P. (1994), Equity in Theory and Practice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
17. Box, G.E.P. and Jenkins, G.M. (1976), Time Series Analysis, Holden-Day, San Francisco, CA.