A prior for steepness in stock-recruitment relationships, based on an evolutionary persistence principle

Fishery Bulletin

Volumn 104, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 428-433

  He, Xi ^a   Mangel, Marc ^b   MacCall, Alec ^a  

^a SOUTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; LIFE HISTORY THEORY; MORTALITY; POPULATION MODELING; PROBABILITY; RECRUITMENT; STOCK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 33745433448     PISSN: 00900656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Chen, D. G., and L. B. Holtby. 2002. A regional metal-model for stock-recruitment analysis using an empirical Bayesian approach. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59:1503-1514.
2. Clark, C. W., and M. Mangel. 2000. Dynamic state variable models in ecology: methods and applications, 289 p. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY.
3. Dorn, M. W. 2002. Advice on west coast rockfish harvest rate from Bayesian meta-analysis of stock-recruitment relationships. No. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 22:280-300.
4. Hakoyama, H., Y. Iwasa, and J. Nakanishi. 2000. Comparing risk factors for population extinction. J. Theor. Biol. 204:327-336.
5. Hilborn, R., and C. J. Walters. 1992. Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: choice, dynamics and uncertainty, 570 p. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY.
6. MacCall, A, D. 2002. Use of known-biomass production models to determine productivity of west coast groundfish stocks. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 22:272-279.
7. Mangel, M., and C. W. Clark. 1988. Dynamic modeling in behavioral ecology, 308 p. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
8. Millar, R. B. 2002. Reference priors for Bayesian fisheries models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59:1492-1502.
9. Minte-Vera, C. V., T. A. Branch, I. J. Stewart, and M. W. Dorn. 2005. Practical application for meta-analysis results: avoiding the double use of data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62:925-929.
10. Munch, S. B., A. Kottas, and M. Mangel. 2005. Bayesian non-parametric analysis of stock recruitment relationships. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62:1808-1821.
11. Myers, R. A. 1998. Why do environment-recruitment correlations work? Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 8:285-305.
12. 2001. Stock and recruitment: generalizations about maximum reproductive rate, density dependence, and variability using meta-analytic approaches. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 58:937-951
13. Myers, R. A., N. J. Barrowman, R. Hilborn, and D. G. Kehler. 2002. Inferring Bayesian priors with limited direct data: Applications to risk analysis. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 22:351-364.
14. Needle G. L. 2002. Recruitment models: diagnosis and prognosis. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 11:95-2002.
15. Punt, A. E. 2003. Evaluating the efficacy of managing West Coast groundfish resources through simulation. Fish. Bull. 101:860-873.
16. Punt, A. E., and R. Hilborn. 1997. Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approach. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 7:35-63.
17. Williams, E. H., and K. W. Shertzer. 2003. Implications of life-history invariants for biological reference points used in fishery management. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 60:710-720.