Is there a mismatch negativity during change blindness?

NeuroReport

Volumn 17, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1011-1015

  Henderson, Ross M ^a   Orbach, Harry S ^a  

^a GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Change blindness; Event related potential; Mismatch negativity; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLINDNESS; BLINKING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BLINDNESS; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33745432819     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000223390.36457.b4     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Näätänen R. Attention and brain function. Lawrence Erlbaum: New Jersey; 1992.
2. Yabe H, Tervaniemi M, Reinikainen K, Naatanen R. Temporal window of integration revealed by MMN to sound omission. NeuroReport 1997; 8:1971-1974.
3. Pazo-Alvarez P, Cadaveira F, Amenedo E. MMN in the visual modality: a review. Biol Psychol 2003; 63:199-236.
4. Winkler I, Czigler I, Sussman E, Horvath J, Balazs L. Preattentive binding of auditory and visual stimulus features. J Cogn Neurosci 2005; 17:320-339.
5. Stagg C, Hindley P, Tales A, Butler S. Visual mismatch negativity: the detection of stimulus change. NeuroReport 2004; 15:659-663.
6. Kenemans JL, Jong TG, Verbaten MN. Detection of visual change: mismatch or rareness? NeuroReport 2003; 14:1239-1242.
7. Czigler I, Balazs L, Winkler I. Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visual changes. Psychophysiology 2002; 39:869-873.
8. Grimes J. On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In: Akins K, editor. Vancouver studies in cognitive science. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. pp. 89-110.
9. Rensink RA, O'Regan JK, Clark JJ. To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychol Sci 1997; 8:368-373.
10. Simons DJ, Levin DT. Change blindness. Trends Cogn Sci 1997; 1:261-267.
11. Scott-Brown KC, Orbach HS. Contrast discrimination, non-uniform patterns and change blindness. Proc R Soc London, Biol Sci 1998; 265:2159-2166.
12. Mitroff SR, Simons DJ, Franconeri SL. The siren song of implicit change detection. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Performance 2002; 28:798-815.
13. Beck DM, Rees G, Frith CD, Lavie N. Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nat Neurosci 2001; 4:645-650.
14. Fernandez-Duque D, Grossi G, Thornton IM, Neville HJ. Representation of change: separate electrophysiological markers of attention, awareness, and implicit processing. J Cogn Neurosci 2003; 15:491-507.
15. Pessoa L, Ungerleider LG. Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness in a working memory task. Cereb Cortex 2004; 14:511-520.
16. Koivisto M, Revonsuo A. An ERP study of change detection, change blindness, and visual awareness. Psychophysiology 2003; 40:423-429.
17. Niedeggen M, Wichmann P, Stoerig P. Change blindness and time to consciousness. Eur J Neurosci 2001; 14:1719-1726.
18. Turatto M, Angrilli A, Mazza V, Umilta C, Driver J. Looking without seeing the background change: electrophysiological correlates of change detection versus change blindness. Cognition 2002; 84:B1-10.
19. Wilson HR, McFarlane DK, Phillips GC. Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking. Vis Res 1983; 23:873-882.
20. Geisser S, Greenhouse S. An extension of Box's results on the use of the F distribution in multivariate analysis. Ann Math Stat 1958; 29:885-891.
21. Luck SJ, Hillyard SA. Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology 1994; 31:291-308.
22. Squires KC, Squires NK, Hillyard SA. Decision-related cortical potentials during an auditory signal detection task with cued observation intervals. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Performance 1975; 1:268-279.
23. Orbach HS, Henderson RM. Are there event-related potential (ERP) correlates of implicit change detection? A miscuing paradigm. J Vis 2003; 3:588a.