Primary reaction steps of Al13- clusters in an HCl atmosphere: Snapshots of the dissolution of a base metal

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 128, Issue 24, 2006, Pages 7904-7908

  Burgert, Ralf ^a   Stokes, Sarah T ^b   Bowen, Kit H ^b   Schnöckel, Hansgeorg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLOTRON RESONANCE; DISSOLUTION; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; HYDROGEN INORGANIC COMPOUNDS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; OXIDATION; REACTION KINETICS;

HETEROGENEOUS REACTION; HYDROGEN CHLORIDE; MOLECULAR MODEL; ULTRA-LOW-PRESSURE;

ALUMINUM;

ALUMINUM; ALUMINUM CHLORIDE; BASE; HYDROCHLORIC ACID; HYDROGEN; METAL;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; DISSOLUTION; HYPOBARISM; ION CYCLOTRON RESONANCE MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLITE; MOLECULAR MODEL; OXIDATION; REACTION ANALYSIS; REACTION TIME; REACTIVE INTERMEDIATE; ULTRA LOW PRESSURE;

EID: 33745414043     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja060613x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bergeron, D. E.; Castleman, A. W.; Morisato, T.; Khanna, S. N. Science 2004, 304, 84-87.
2. Bergeron, D. E.; Roach, P. J.; Castleman, A. W.; Jones, N.; Khanna, S. N. Science 2005, 307, 231-235.
3. Knight, W. D.; Clemenger, K.; De Heer, W. A.; Saunders, W. A.; Chou, M. Y.; Cohen, M. L. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1984, 52, 2141-2143.
4. Treutier, O.; Ahlrichs, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 346-354.
5. Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 1988, 38, 3098-3100.
6. Perdew, J. P. Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 8822.
7. Eichkorn, K.; Treutler, O.; Oehm, H.; Häser, M.; Ahlrichs, R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 240, 283-290.
8. Eichkorn, K.; Weigend, F.; Treutler, O.; Ahlrichs, R. Theor. Chem. Acc. 1997, 97, 119-124.
9. Schäfer, A.; Horn, H.; Ahlrichs, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 2571-2577.
10. -1 (in agreement with our experimental observation).
11. -] itself cannot be observed.
12. Langevin, P. Ann. Chim. Phys. 1905, 5, 245-288.
13. Baer, T., Hase, W. L., Eds. Unimolecular Reaction Dynamics: Theory and Experiments; Oxford University Press: New York, 1996: 438 pp.
14. Burgert, R.; Schnöckel, H.; Olzmann, M.; Bowen, K. H., Jr. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1476-1479.
15. - in the schematic energy diagram (Figure 2) has to be shifted. However, this shift will not influence the principal conclusions.
16. Bergeron, D. E.; Castleman, A. W.; Morisato, T.; Khanna, S. N. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121, 10456-10466.
17. Leuchtner, R. E.; Harms, A. C.; Castleman, A. W., Jr. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 91, 2753-2754.
18. Burkart, S.; Blessing, N.; Klipp, B.; Muller, J.; Ganteför, G.; Seifert, G. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 301, 546-550.
19. NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables, 4th ed.; Chase, M. W., Ed.; J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data Monograph 9; American Institute of Physics: St. Louis, 1998; pp 1-1951. See also Supporting Information.
20. Dohmeier, C.; Loos, D.; Schnöckel, H. Angew. Chem., Int Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 129-149.
21. 13.
22. -.
23. 2 have been discussed in a matrix isolation study: Schnöckel, H. J. Mol. Struct. 1978, 50, 275-280.
24. Schulz, A.; Hargittai, M. Chem.-Eur. J. 2001, 7, 3657-3670.
25. Soehnel, T.; Hermann, H.; Schwerdtfeger, P. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 526-531.
26. Furche, F.; Ahlrichs, R.; Weis, P.; Jacob, C.; Gilb, S.; Bierweiler, T.; Kappes, M. M. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 6982-6990.