Anti-snob land use laws, suburban exclusion, and housing opportunity

Journal of Urban Affairs

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 295-313

  Cowan, Spencer M ^a  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFORDABLE HOUSING; LAND USE; LEGISLATION; SUBURBAN AREA; URBAN PLANNING;

NEW ENGLAND; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33745403852     PISSN: 07352166     EISSN: 14679906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-9906.2006.00293.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Advisory Commission on Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing (1991). "Not in my back yard": Removing barriers to affordable housing. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Babcock, R. F. (1966). The zoning game: Municipal practices and policies. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Boger, J. C. (1997). Mount Laurel at 21 years: Reflections on the power of courts and legislatures to shape social change. Seton Hall Law Review, 27(4), 1450-1470.
4. Breagy, J. (1976). Overriding the suburbs. Boston, MA: Citizens Housing and Planning Association.
5. Briffault, R. (1990). Our localism: Part I - The structure of local government law. Columbia Law Review, 90, 1-115.
6. Brown, K. D. (2001). Expanding affordable housing through inclusionary zoning: Lessons from the Washington metropolitan area. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
7. Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
8. Buchanan v. Warley, 245 U.S. 60 (1917).
9. Burchell, R. W., Listokin, D., & Pashman, A. (1994). Regional housing opportunities for lower income households: A resource guide to affordable housing and regional mobility strategies. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
10. Calavita, N., & Grimes, K. (1998). Inclusionary housing in California: The experience of two decades. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(2), 150-169.
11. Chapter 774 of the Acts of 1969. Massachusetts General Laws Annotated, Chapter 40B, §§ 20-23 (2001).
12. Charles, C. Z. (2005). Can we live together? Racial preferences and neighborhood outcomes. In X. DeS. Briggs (Ed.), The geography of opportunity. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
13. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
14. Davidoff, P., & Davidoff, L. (1971). Opening the suburbs: Toward inclusionary land use controls. Syracuse Law Review, 22, 509-536.
15. Dietderich, A. G. (1996). An egalitarian's market: The economics of inclusionary zoning reclaimed. Fordham Urban Journal, 24, 23-104.
16. Downs, A. (1973). Opening up the suburbs: An urban strategy for America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17. Edgar, R. (2003). Towns take on R. I. housing law. The Providence Journal, p. A1.
18. Edmonds, S. (1980). Housing needs studies: The Massachusetts experience. Boston, MA: Citizens Housing and Planning Association.
19. Ellickson, R. C. (1981). The irony of inclusionary zoning. Southern California Law Review, 54, 1167-1216.
20. Farley, R., Fielding, E., & Krysan, M. (1997). The residential preferences of blacks and whites: A four metropolis analysis. Housing Policy Debate, 8(4), 763-800.
21. Farley, R., Steeh, C., Jackson, T., Krysan, M., & Reeves, K. (1993). Continued racial residential segregation in Detroit: 'Chocolate City, Vanilla Suburbs' revisited. Journal of Housing Research, 4(1), 1-38.
22. Feins, J. D. (2005). A cross-site analysis of MTO's locational impacts. In J. Goering & J. D. Feins (Eds.), Choosing a better life?: Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity social experiment. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
23. Fischel, W. A. (1985). The economics of zoning laws: A property rights approach to American land use controls. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
24. Gale, D. E. (1992). Eight state-sponsored growth management programs: A comparative analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(4), 425-439.
25. Galster, G., & Rothenberg, J. (1991). Filtering in urban housing: A graphical analysis of a quality-segmented market. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 11, 37-50.
26. Goering, J. (2005). Political origins and opposition. In J. Goering & J. D. Feins (Eds.), Choosing a better life?: Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity social experiment. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
27. Goetz, E. G. (2005). Clearing the way: Deconcentrating the poor in urban America. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
28. Herr, P. B., & Associates (2000). Zoning for housing affordability. A study prepared for the Massachusetts Housing Partnership Fund.
29. Hollister, T. S. (1999). Presentation to Stamford Regional Bar Association, January 14, 1999. The data are on file with this author.
30. James v. Valtierra, 402 U.S. 137 (1971).
31. Krefetz, S. P. (2001). The impact and evolution of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Permit and Zoning Appeals Act: Thirty Years of experience with a state legislative effort to overcome exclusionary zoning. Western New England Law Review, 22(2), 381-430.
32. Lohe, W. (2000). The Massachusetts Comprehensive Permit Law: Collaboration between affordable housing advocates and environmentalists. Land Use Law & Zoning Digest, May.
33. Lohe, W. (2001). Command and control to local control: The environmental agenda and the Comprehensive Permit Law. Western New England Law Review, 22(2), 355-380.
34. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Lowry, I. S., & Ferguson, B. W. (1992). Development regulation and housing affordability. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
36. Luger, M. I., & Temkin, K. (2000). Red tape and housing costs: How regulation affects new residential development. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
37. Mallach, A. (1984). Inclusionary housing programs: Policies and practices. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
38. Malpezzi, S. (1996). Housing prices, externalities, and regulation in U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Housing Policy Research, 7(2), 209-242.
39. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Meck, S., Retzlaff, R., & Schwab, J. (2003). Regional approaches to affordable housing. Chicago: American Planning Association.
41. Mueller, D. C. (1989). Public choice II: A revised edition of public choice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Nenno, M. K. (1991). State and local governments: New initiatives in low-income housing preservation. Housing Policy Debate, 2(2), 467-497.
43. Payne, J. M. (1996). Norman Williams, exclusionary zoning, and the Mount Laurel doctrine: Making the theory fit the facts. Vermont Law Review, 20, 665-686.
44. Pendall, R. (2000). Local land use regulation and the chain of exclusion. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(2), 125-142.
45. Popkin, S. J., Galster, G. C., Temkin, K., Herbig, C., Levy, D. K., & Richer, E. K. (2003). Obstacles to desegregating public housing: Lessons learned from implementing eight consent decrees. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(2), 179-199.
46. Public Acts 89-311, Title 8, Chapter 126a, Connecticut General Statutes, §8-30g, 2004.
47. Public Laws of 1991, Chapter 154, §1, Rhode Island General Laws 45-54-1 et seq., 2001.
48. Reed, E. F. (1981). Tilting at windmills: The Massachusetts low and moderate income housing Act. Western New England Law Review, 4, 105-132.
49. Rohe, W. M. (2000). What will it take to disperse affordable housing: Comments on the Housing and Community Development conference papers, presentations and discussion. Unpublished manuscript.
50. Roisman, F. W. (1997). The role of the state, the necessity of race-conscious remedies, and other lessons from the Mount Laurel study. Seton Hall Law Review, 27(4), 1386-1425.
51. Rolleston, B. S. (1987). Determinants of restrictive suburban zoning: An empirical analysis. Journal of Urban Economics, 21, 1-21.
52. Rosenbaum, E., Harris, L., & Denton, N. A. (2005). New places, new faces. In J. Goering & J. D. Feins (Eds.), Choosing a better life?: Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity social experiment. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
53. Rothenberg, J., Galster, G. C., Butler, R. V., & Pitkin, J. (1991). The maze of urban housing markets. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
54. Ruben, E. A., & Williams, C. (1979). Comprehensive permits: For housing lower income households in Massachusetts. Boston: Citizens Housing and Planning Association.
55. Rubinowitz, L. S., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2000). Crossing the class and color lines: From public housing to white suburbia. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
56. Salsich, P. W., Jr. (2003). The impact of land use laws on affordable housing. Retrieved April 10, 2005 from http://www.ewgateway.org/pdffiles/ BluePrintDocs/LandUseLaws.pdf.
57. Shroder, M. (2005). Locational constraint, housing counseling, and successful lease-up. In J. Goering & J. D. Feins (Eds.), Choosing a better life?: Evaluating the Moving To Opportunity social experiment. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
58. Southern Burlington County NAACP v. Township of Mt. Laurel (Mount Laurel I), 336 A.2d 713 (N.J.), appeal dismissed & cert. denied, 423 U.S. 808 (1975).
59. Southern Burlington County NAACP v. Township of Mt. Laurel (Mount Laurel II), 92 N.J. 158, 456 A.2d 390 (1983).
60. State-Sponsored Growth Management as a Remedy for Exclusionary Zoning. (1995). Harvard Law Review, 108, 1127-1144.
61. Stegman, M. A. (1990). A review of production under New Jersey's Mount Laurel inclusionary housing process. In R. W. Burchell (Ed.), Affordable housing paper series (draft copy).
62. Stegman, M. A., Quercia, R. G., & McCarthy, G. (2000). Housing America's working families. New Century Housing, 1(1), 1-48.
63. Stockman, P. K. (1992). Note: Anti-snob zoning in Massachusetts: Assessing one attempt at opening the suburbs to affordable housing. Virginia Law Review, 78, 535-579.
64. Stonefield, S. (2001). Affordable housing in suburbia: The importance but limited power and effectiveness of the state override tool. Western New England Law Review, 22(2), 323-354.
65. Terner, I. D., & Cook, T. B. (1990). New directions for federal housing policy: The role of the states. In D. DiPasquale & L. C. Keyes (Eds.), Building foundations. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
66. Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-424.
67. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (2000). Rental housing assistance - The worsening crisis: A report to Congress on worst case housing needs. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD, 2000).
68. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (2005). "Why not in our community?: Removing barriers to affordable housing. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD, 2005).
69. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corporation, 429 U.S. 252 (1977).
70. Wheeler, M. (1990). Resolving local regulatory disputes and building consensus for affordable housing. In D. DiPasquale & L. C. Keyes (Eds.), Building foundations. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
71. Wish, N. B., & Eisdorfer, S. (1997). The impact of Mount Laurel initiatives: An analysis of the characteristics of applicants and occupants. Seton Hall Law Review, 27(4), 1268-1337.