Collaborative professional development for science educators: Locating reflection in practice through a science methods course

Journal of Science Teacher Education

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 47-61

  Grunau, Hal ^a,b   Pedretti, Erminia ^a,b   Wolfe, Elgin ^a,b   Galbraith, Don ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745400606     PISSN: 1046560X     EISSN: 15731847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009475715059     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baird, J.R. (1999). A phenomenological exploration of teachers' views of science teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 75-94.
2. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: The Falmer Press.
3. Cinnamond, J. & Zimpher, N. (1990). Reflection as a function of community. In R.T. Clift, W.R. Houston, & M.C. Pugach (Eds.), Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis of issues and programs. (pp. 57-72). New York: Teachers College Press.
4. Clift, R. T, Houston, W.R., & Pugach, M.C. (Eds.) (1990). Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis of issues and programs. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Colburn, A., & Tillotson, J. (1998). A case study for use in science methods courses. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 9(2), 153-164.
6. Cornett, W. J. (1990). Utilizing action research in graduate curriculum courses. Theory into Practice, 29, pp. 185-199.
7. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath and Co. Volume 1.
8. Elliott, J.J. (1993). Academics and action research: The training workshop as an exercise in ideological deconstruction. In J.J. Elliott (Ed.) Reconstructing teacher education, teacher development (pp. 76-192). London: Palmer Press.
9. Ely, M. (1991). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles. New York: Falmer Press.
10. Feldman, A. (1994). Erberger's dilemma: Validity in action research and science teachers' need to know. Science Education, 78, 83-101.
11. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. (J. Shapir. Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
12. Hewson, P.W., Tabachnick, R.B., Zeichner, K.M., Blomker: KB., Meyer, H. Lemberger, J., Marion, R., Park, H., and Toolin, R. (1999). Educating prospective teachers of biology: Introduction and research methods. Science Education, 83(3), (247-274).
13. LaBoskey, V.K. (1994). Development of reflective practice: A study of preset-vice teachers. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Louden, W. (1992). Understanding reflection through collaborative research. In A. Hargreaves & M.B. Fullan (Eds.), Understanding teacher development (pp. 178-215). New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Louden, W. & Wallace, J. (1996). Quality in the classroom: Learning about teaching through case studies. Australia: Hodder Education.
16. Mackinnon, A. & Grunau, H. (1994). Teacher development through reflection community and discourse. In P.P. Grimmett & J. Newfeld (Eds.), Teacher development and the struggle for authenticity (pp. 165-192). New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Mead, G. (1934). Mind, self; and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Oberg, A. & Artz, S. (1992). Teaching for reflection: Being reflective. In R.T. Clift, W.R. Houston, & M.C. Pugach (Eds.), Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis of issues and programs. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Pedretti, E. (1996). Facilitating action research in science, technology and society (STS) education: An experience in reflective practice. Educational Action Research, 4(3), 307-327).
21. Pedretti, E. (1997). The septic tank crisis: A case study of action research in science, technology and society (STS) education in an elementary school. International Journal of Science Education, 79(10), 1211-1230.
22. Pugach, M.& Johnson, L. (1990). Developing reflective practice through structured dialogue. In R. T. Clift, W.R. Houston, & M.C. Pugach (Eds.), Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis of issues and programs. New York: Teachers College Press.
23. Rudduck, J. (1992). Practitioner research and programs of initial teacher education. In T. Russell & H. Munby (Ed.). Teachers and teaching, from classroom to reflection. New York: Falmer Press.
24. Russell, T. & Munby, H. (1992). Teachers and teaching, from classroom to reflection. New York: Falmer Press.
25. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basics Books.
26. Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
27. Tabachnick, R. & Zeichner, (1999). Idea and action: Action research and the development of conceptual change teaching of science. Science Education, 83(3), 309-322.
28. Wasser, J.D. & Bresler L. (1996). Working in the interpretive zone: Conceptualizing collaboration in qualitative research teams. Educational Researcher, 25(5), 5-15.
29. Whitehead, J. (1993). The growth of educational knowledge: Creating your own living educational theories, Bournemouth: Hyde Publications.
30. Wolfe, T.J.E, and Galbraith, D. (1996). Assignment: Concept Presentation and Critique. Unpublished class material. Toronto: OISE/UT.