|
Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 825-830
|
Comparison of cancer slope factors using different statistical approaches
|
Author keywords
Cancer guidelines; Cancer slope factor; Confidence limit; IRIS; Multistage model
|
Indexed keywords
COMPUTATIONAL METHODS;
CONSTRAINT THEORY;
DATA ACQUISITION;
DRUG DOSAGE;
EXTRAPOLATION;
GRAPH THEORY;
MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
STATISTICAL METHODS;
TUMORS;
CANCER GUIDELINES;
CANCER SLOPE FACTORS;
CONFIDENCE LIMIT;
IRIS;
MULTISTAGE MODEL;
DISEASE CONTROL;
CANCER;
CARCINOGEN;
CONFIDENCE INTERVAL;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
ARTICLE;
CANCER;
CANCER RISK;
CANCER SLOPE FACTOR;
CANCER STATISTICS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DOSE RESPONSE;
LINEAR SYSTEM;
MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD;
METHODOLOGY;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
BIOLOGICAL ASSAY;
CARCINOGENICITY TESTS;
CARCINOGENS;
CARCINOGENS, ENVIRONMENTAL;
DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL;
DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG;
ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE;
HUMANS;
MODELS, STATISTICAL;
NEOPLASMS;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
RISK FACTORS;
|
EID: 33745381903
PISSN: 02724332
EISSN: 15396924
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00769.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (14)
|
References (9)
|