Two methodological worlds apart? Praises and critiques from a European comparativist

Political Analysis

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 332-335

  Rihoux, Benoît ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745353870     PISSN: 10471987     EISSN: 14764989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpj012     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Almond, Gabriel A., and Sidney Verba. 1963. The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2. Becker, Howard S. 1998. Tricks of the trade: How to think about your research while you're doing it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Creswell, John W. 2002. Research design. London: Sage.
4. George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5. Mahoney, James, and Dietrich Rueschemeyer. 2003. Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Moses, Jonathon, Benoît Rihoux, and Bernhard Kittel. 2005. Mapping political methodology: Reflections on a European perspective. European Political Science 4:55-68.
7. Norris, Pippa. 1997. Towards a more cosmopolitan political science? European Journal of Political Research 31:17-34.
8. Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The comparative method. Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, LA: University of California Press.
9. Rihoux, Benoît. 2003. Bridging the gap between the qualitative and quantitative worlds? A retrospective and prospective view on qualitative comparative analysis. Field Methods 15:351-65.
10. Tashakkori, Abbas, and Charles Teddlie. 1998. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Tashakkori, Abbas. 2003. Handbook of mixed methods in the social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.