Procliticized phonological phrases in English: Evidence from rhythm

Studia Linguistica

Volumn 59, Issue 2-3, 2005, Pages 174-193

  Gussenhoven, Carlos ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745324929     PISSN: 00393193     EISSN: 14679582     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9582.2005.00125.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. ABNEY, S. P. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD diss., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
2. BOLINGER, D. 1965. Pitch accent and sentence rhythm. eds. I. Abe & T. Kanekyo, Forms of English: Accent, morpheme, order, 139-180. Tokyo: Hokuou.
3. BOLINGER, D. 1986. Intonation and its parts: The melody of language. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4. BURZIO, L. 1994. Principles of English stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. CHOMSKY, N. & HALLE, M. 1986. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
6. CONNELL, B. & ARVANITI, A. (eds.) 1995. Phonology and phonetic evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. GRABE, E. & WARREN, P. 1995. Stress shift: do speakers do it or do listeners hear it? In Connell & Arvaniti (1995), 95-110.
8. GUSSENHOVEN, C. 1986. Review of Selkirk (1984). Journal of Linguistics 22, 455-474.
9. GUSSENHOVEN, C. 1987. Lexical accent rules in English. eds. W. Bahner, J. Schildt & D. Viehweger, Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Linguists. Berlin/GDR, August 10-15, 1987, 432-436. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
10. GUSSENHOVEN, C. 1991. The English Rhythm Rule as an accent deletion rule. Phonology 8, 1-35.
11. GUSSENHOVEN, C. 1994. English stress in lexical phonology. eds. W. U. Dressler, M. Prinzhorm & J. J. Rennison, Phonologica 1992, 87-96. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.
12. GUSSENHOVEN, C. 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. HAYES, B. 1984. The phonology of rhythm in English. Linguistic. Inquiry 15, 33-74.
14. HORNE, M. 1990. Empirical evidence for a deletion analysis of the rhythm rule in English. Linguistics 28, 959-981.
15. KAGER, R. 1999. Optimality theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. KIPARSKY, P. 2000. Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 17, 351-367.
17. KIPARSKY, P. 2002. Paradigms and Opacity. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
18. LADD, D. R. & MONAGHAN, A. 1987. Modelling rhythmic and syntactic effects on accent in long noun phrases. eds. J. Laver & M. Jack, Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Technology, Volume 2, 29-32. Edinburgh: CEP.
19. LIBERMAN, M. Y. & PRINCE, A. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 249-336.
20. MCCARTHY, J. J. 2002. A thematic guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. MCCARTHY, J. J. & PRINCE, A. 1993. Generalized alignment. eds. G. Booij & J. van Marie, Yearbook of Morphology 1992, 79-153. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
22. MCCARTHY, J. J. & PRINCE, A. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. eds. J. N. Beckman, L. Walsh Dickey & S. Urbanczyk, Papers in Optimality Theory, 249-384. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
23. NESPOR, M. & VOGEL, I. B. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
24. OSTENDORF, M., PRICE, P. & SHATTUCK-HUFNAGEL, S. 1995. The Boston University Radio News Corpus. Technical report, Boston University ECS Technical Report ECS-95-001.
25. POST, B. 2000. Tonal and phrasal structures in French intonation. The Hague: Thesus.
26. PRINCE, A. 1983. Relating to the grid. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 19-100.
27. PRINCE, A. & SMOLENSKY, P. 1993. Optimality theory. Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Rutgers University and University of Colorado. Technical Report 2.
28. RADFORD, A. 1981. Transformational syntax. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. SCHREUDER, M. & GILBERS, D. 2004. Recursive patterns in phonological phrases. eds. B. Bel & I. Marlien, Speech Prosody 2002 Proceedings, Nara, Japan, 341-344. ISCA (SproSig).
30. SELKIRK, E. 1978. On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. ed. T. Fretheim, Nordic prosody II, 268-271. Trondheim: Tapir.
31. SELKIRK, E. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. SELKIRK, E. 1986. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3, 371-405.
33. SELKIRK, E. 1995. The prosodic structure of function words. eds. J. Beckman, L. Walsh Dickey & S. Urbanczyk, Papers in Optimality Theory, 439-470. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
34. SHATTUCK-HUFNAGEL, S. 1989. Stress shift as the placement of phrase-level pitch markers. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 86, 493.
35. SHATTUCK-HUFNAGEL, S. 1995. Pitch acccent patterns in adjacent-stress vs. alternating stress words in American English. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol. 3, 656-659.
36. SHATTUCK-HUFNAGEL, S., OSTENDORF, M. & ROSS, K. 1979. Stress shift and early pitch accent placement in lexical items in American English. Journal of Phonetics 22, 357-388.
37. TRUCKENBRODT, H. 2002. Variation in p-phrasing in Bengali. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, Vol. 2, 259-303.
38. VAN DER HULST, H. 1999. Word accent. In Van der Hulst (1999), 3-115.
39. VAN DER HULST, H. (ed.) 1999. Word prosodic systems in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
40. VANDERSLICE, R. & LADEFOGED, P. 1972. Binary suprasegmental features and transformational word-accentuation rules. Language 48, 819-838.
41. VOGEL, I., BUNNELL, T. & HOSKINS, S. 1995. The phonology and phonetics of the Rhythm Rule. In Connell & Arvaniti (1995), 111-127.
42. ZONNEVELD, W., TROMMELEN, M., JESSEN, M., RICE, C., BRUCE, G. & ÁRNASON, K. 1999. Wordstress in West-Germanic and North-Germanic languages. In Van der Hulst (1999), 477-603.