Control balance and exploitative corporate crime

Criminology

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 397-430

  Piquero, Nicole Leeper ^a   Piquero, Alex R ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b and Society

^c National Consortium on Violence Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Control balance; Corporate crime; Exploitation

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745320750     PISSN: 00111384     EISSN: 17459125     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00053.x     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Benson, Michael L. 1985. Denying the guilty mind: Accounting for involvement in a white-collar crime. Criminology 23:583-607.
2. Benson, Michael L., and Elizabeth Moore. 1992. Are white-collar and common offenders the same? An empirical and theoretical critique of a recently proposed general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 29:251-72.
3. Block, Michael K., Frederick C. Nold, and J. Gregory Sidak. 1981. The deterrent effect of antitrust enforcement. Journal of Political Economy 89:429-45.
4. Box, Steven. 1983. Power, Crime, and Mystification, 2nd ed. London: Tavistock.
5. Braithwaite, John. 1984. Corporate Crime in the Pharmaceutical Industry. London: Routledge and Paul Kegan.
6. Braithwaite, John. 1985. White collar crime. Annual Review of Sociology 11:1-25.
7. Braithwaite, John. 1997. Charles Tittle's control balance and criminological theory. Theoretical Criminology 1:77-97.
8. Braithwaite, John, and Toni Makkai. 1991. Testing an expected utility model of corporate deterrence. Law and Society Review 35:7-39.
9. Curry, G. David. 1998. Book Review: Control Balance: Toward a General Theory of Deviance. Social Forces 76:1147-149.
10. Curry, Theodore R., and Alex R. Piquero. 2003. Control ratios and defiant acts of deviance: Assessing additive and conditional effects with constraints and impulsivity. Sociological Perspectives 46:397-415.
11. DeLisi, Matt, and Andrew L. Hochstetler. 2002. An exploratory assessment of Tittle's control balance theory: Results from the National Youth Survey. Justice Professional 15:261-72.
12. Fishbein, Martin M., and Icek K. Ajzen. 1975. Beliefs, Attitudes, Intention, and Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13. Gottfredson, Michael R., and Travis Hirschi. 1990. General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. Green, Donald. 1989. Measures of illegal behavior in individual-level deterrence research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 26:253-75.
15. Hickman, Matthew, and Alex R. Piquero. 2001. Exploring the relationships between gender, control ratios, and deviance. Deviant Behavior 22:323-51.
16. Hickman, Matthew, Alex R. Piquero, Brian A. Lawton, and Jack R. Greene. 2001. Applying Tittle's control balance theory to police deviance. Policing 24:497-519.
17. Higgins, George E., and Christopher Lauterbach. 2004. Control balance theory and exploitation: An examination of contingencies. Criminal Justice Studies 17:291-310.
18. Hirschi, Travis, and Michael R. Gottfredson. 1993. Commentary: Testing the general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30:47-54.
19. Hollinger, Richard C. 1991. Neutralizing in the workplace: An empirical analysis of property theft and production deviance. Deviant Behavior 12:169-202.
20. Jackall, Robert. 1988. Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Jensen, Gary A. 1999. A critique of control balance theory: Digging into details. Theoretical Criminology 3:339-43.
22. Katz, Jack. 1988. Seductions of Crime. New York: Basic Books.
23. Kim, Min-Sun, and John. E. Hunter. 1993. Relationships among attitudes, behavioral intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis of past research. Part 2. Communication Research 20:331-64.
24. Makkai, Toni, and John Braithwaite. 1994. The dialects of corporate deterrence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 31:347-73.
25. Nagin, Daniel, and Raymond Paternoster. 1993. Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law and Society Review 27:467-96.
26. Paternoster, Raymond, and Sally S. Simpson. 1993. A rational choice theory of corporate crime. In Advances in Criminological Theory, vol. 5, eds. Ronald V. Clarke and Marcus Felson. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
27. Paternoster, Raymond, and Sally S. Simpson. 1996. Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law and Society Review 30:549-83.
28. Piquero, Alex R., and Matthew Hickman. 1999. An empirical test of Tittle's control balance theory. Criminology 37:319-41.
29. Piquero, Alex R., and Matthew Hickman. 2002. The rational choice implications of control balance theory. In Rational Choice and Criminal Behavior: Recent Changes and Future Challenges, eds. Alex R. Piquero and Stephen G. Tibbetts. New York: Routledge.
30. Piquero, Alex R., and Matthew Hickman. 2003. Extending control balance theory to account for victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior 30:282-301.
31. Piquero, Alex R., and Stephen G. Tibbetts. 1996. Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low self-control and situational factors in offending decision making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending. Justice Quarterly 13:481-510.
32. Piquero, Alex R., Randall Macintosh, and Matthew Hickman. 2001. Applying Rasch modeling to the validity of a control balance scale. Journal of Criminal Justice 29:493-505.
33. Piquero, Nicole Leeper, M. Lyn Exum, and Sally S. Simpson. 2005. Integrating the desire for control and rational choice in a corporate crime context. Justice Quarterly 22:252-80.
34. Piquero, Nicole Leeper, Stephen G. Tibbetts, and Michael B. Blankenship. 2005. Examining the role of differential association and techniques of neutralization in explaining corporate crime. Deviant Behavior 26:159-88.
35. Pogarsky, Greg. 2004. Projected offending and contemporaneous rule-violation: Implications for heterotypic continuity. Criminology 42:111-36.
36. Punch, Maurice. 1996. Dirty Business: Exploring Corporate Misconduct-Analysis and Cases. London: Sage Publications.
37. Rawlings, John. 1998. Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
38. Reisman, W. Michael. 1979. Folded Lives. New York: Free Press.
39. Rossi, P. H., and A. B. Anderson. 1982. The factorial survey approach: An introduction. In Measuring Social Judgements, eds. P. H. Rossi and S. L. Nock. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
40. Savelsberg, Joachim J. 1996. Review: Control Balance: Toward a General Theory of Deviance. American Journal of Sociology 102:620-22.
41. Savelsberg, Joachim J. 1999. Human nature and social control in complex society: A critique of Charles Tittle's control balance. Theoretical Criminology 3:331-38.
42. Simpson, Sally S. 2002. Corporate Crime, Law, and Social Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Simpson, Sally S. 2003. The criminological enterprise and corporate crime. The Criminologist 28:1-5.
44. Simpson, Sally S., and Christopher S. Koper. 1992. Deterring corporate crime. Criminology 30:347-75.
45. Simpson, Sally S., Raymond Paternoster, and Nicole Leeper Piquero. 1998. Exploring the micro-macro link in corporate crime research. In Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Deviance in and of Organizations, vol. 15, eds. P. A. Bamberger and W. J. Sonnenstuhl. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
46. Simpson, Sally S., and Nicole Leeper Piquero. 2002. Low self-control, organizational theory, and corporate crime. Law and Society Review 36:509-48.
47. Tittle, Charles R. 1995. Control Balance. Boulder, CO: Westview.
48. Tittle, Charles R. 1997. Thoughts stimulated by Braithwaite's analysis of control balance theory. Theoretical Criminology 1:99-110.
49. Tittle, Charles R. 1999. Continuing the discussion of control balance. Theoretical Criminology 3:344-52.
50. Tittle, Charles R. 2001. Control balance. In Explaining Criminals and Crime, eds. Raymond Paternoster and Ronet Bachman. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
51. Tittle, Charles R. 2004. Refining control balance theory. Theoretical Criminology 8:395-428.
52. Tittle, Charles R., and Raymond Paternoster. 2000. Social Deviance and Crime: An Organizational and Theoretical Approach. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
53. Tittle, Charles R., David A. Ward, and Harold G. Grasmick. 2004. Capacity for self-control and individuals' interest in exercising self-control. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 20:143-72.
54. Vaughan, Diane. 1992. The macro-micro connection in white-collar crime theory. In White Collar Crime Reconsidered, eds. Kip Schlegel and David Weisburd. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
55. Vaughan, Diane. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56. Vaughan, Diane. 1998. Rational choice, situated action, and the social control of organizations. Law & Society Review 32:23-61.
57. Weisburd, David, Elin Waring, and Ellen F. Chayet. 1995. Specific deterrence in a sample of offenders convicted of white-collar crimes. Criminology 33:587-607.
58. Wood, Peter B., and R. Gregory Dunaway. 1997-1998. An application of control balance theory to incarcerated sex offenders. Journal of the Oklahoma Criminal Justice Research Consortium 4:1-12.