An undergraduate course on publishing in neuroscience

Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2006, Pages

  Jones, Leslie Sargent ^a,b   Black, L Codi ^a   Bright, Lauren ^a   Meekins, Catherine ^a   Thakur, Vivek ^a   Warren, Cade ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Peer review; Science writing; Scientific publishing; Teaching publishing syllabus; Undergraduate neuroscience journals

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745319765     PISSN: 15442896     EISSN: 15442896     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ancker, J, Nylenna, M, Cann, CI, Bloom, M, Mlyniec, W, Simpson, C (2002) Publication issues for non-anglophone scientists. Science Editor 25:5-6.
2. Bar-llan J, Gutman T (2003) How do search engines handle non-English queries? - A case study, WWW Alternate Paper Tracks www2003.org/cdrom/papers/ alternate/P415/BARILAN.HTM.
3. The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America's Research Universities 1998 naples.cc.sunysb.edu/Pres/boyer.nsf.
4. Ewing JH (2004) Open access to journals won't lower prices. Chron Higher Ed 51:B20.
5. Gass A, Doyle H (2005) The Reality of open-access journal articles. Chron Higher Ed 51:B13.
6. Gilbert SF (2004) A case against undergraduate-only journal publications. Cell Biol Ed 3:22-23.
7. Guilford W (2001) Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Adv Physiol Ed 25:167-175.
8. Judson HF (2004) The Great Betrayal: Fraud in Science, Harcourt, Inc. Orlando, FL.
9. Jungck JR, Harris M, Marcuri R, Tusin J (2004) Undergraduates: Do research, publish! Cell Biol Ed 3:24-26.
10. Koonin EV, Landweber LF, Lipman DJ (2006) A community experiment with fully open and published peer review. Biol Direct. 1:1.
11. Little JW, Parker R (2004) How to Read a Scientific Paper, course notes. University of Arizona, AZ, 85721, www.biochem.arizona.edu/classes/bioc568/ papers.htm#evaluate.
12. McCook A (2006) Is peer review broken? The Scientist Feb:26-34.
13. Monastersky R (2005a) The number that's devouring science. Chron Higher Ed 52:A12.
14. Monastersky R (2005b) Impact factors run into competition. The Chron Higher Ed 52:A17.
15. Olds B (2002) Academic Publishing Seminar course syllabus. Colorado School of Mines, CO 80401. www.mines.edu/Academic/courses/lais/licm598/licm598. html.
16. Plotnik A (2000) The Elements of Editing. New York, USA: Macmillan.
17. Responsible Conduct Regarding Scientific Communication, provided at the Society for Neuroscience website, http://apu.sfn.org/content/Publications/ Guidelines2/index.html.
18. Seymour E, Hunter A-B, Larsen S, DeAntoni T (2004) Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates: First findings from a three-year study. Sci Ed 88:493-531.
19. Shertzer M (1986) The elements of grammar. New York, USA: Macmillan.
20. Siegel V (2004) Weighing the pros and cons of undergraduate-only journal publications. Cell Biol Ed 3:27.
21. Simpson C (2002) Publication issuer for non-Anglophone scientists. Science Editor 25:5-6.
22. Strunk Jr. W, White EB, Angell R (2000) The elements of style, Fourth Edition. New York, USA: Macmillan.
23. Thomas J, Rewer KL, Davis SF (2002) Professional development benefits of publishing in the Psi Chi Journal of Undergraduate Research. Eye on Psy Chi 6:30-35.
24. Truss L (2003) Eats, shoots & leaves. New York, USA: Penguin Group.
25. Van Leeuwen TN, Moed HF, Tussen RJW, Visser MS, van Raan, AFJ (2001) Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparison of national research performance. Scientometrics 51:333-346.
26. Vastag B (2006) Cancer fraud case stuns research community, prompts reflection on peer review process. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:374-376.