Embodied Spaces, Social Places and Bourdieu: Locating and Dislocating the Child in Family Relationships

Body & Society

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 11-33

  Haimes, Erica ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745307011     PISSN: 1357034X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1357034X030091002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aldridge, A. (1998) ‘Habitus and Cultural Capital in the Field of Personal Finance’, Sociological Review 46(1): 1–23.
2. Blyth, E. and J. Speirs (eds) (1998) Truth and the Child. London: British Association of Social Workers.
3. Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1990) In Other Words. Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. Bourdieu, P. (1996) ‘On the Family as a Realized Category’, Theory, Culture & Society 13(3): 19–26.
6. Bourdieu, P. (1999) The Weight of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7. Bourdieu, P. (2000a) Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8. Bourdieu, P. (2000b) ‘Social Space and Symbolic Space’, pp. 3–16 in D. Robbins (ed.) Pierre Bourdieu, Vol. IV. London: Sage.
9. Bourdieu, P. and L. Wacquant (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Brubaker, R. (2000) ‘Social Theory as Habitus’, pp. 33–52 in D. Robbins (ed.) Pierre Bourdieu, Vol. II.London: Sage.
11. Butler, J. (2000) Antigone's Claim: Kinship Between Life and Death. New York: Columbia University Press.
12. Dolgin, J. (1995) ‘The Law Debates the Family: Reproductive Transformations’, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 7(1): 37–86.
13. Dolgin, J. (1998) ‘An Emerging Consensus: Reproductive Technologies and the Law’, Vermont Law Review 23(2): 225–281.
14. Frank, A. (1991) ‘For a Sociology of the Body: An Analytical Review’, pp. 36–102 in M. Featherstone, M. Hepworth and B.S. Turner (eds) The Body: Social Process and Cultural Theory. London: Sage.
15. Franklin, S. (1997) Embodied Progress. London: Routledge.
16. Haimes, E. (1987) ‘Now I Know Who I Really Am’, pp. 359–371 in T. Honess and K. Yardley (eds) Self and Identity. London: Routledge.
17. Haimes, E. (1990) ‘Recreating the Family?’, in M. McNeil, I. Varcoe and S. Yearley (eds) The New Reproductive Technologies. London: Macmillan.
18. Haimes, E. (1992) ‘Gamete Donation and the Social Management of Genetic Origins’, pp 119–147 in M. Stacey (ed.) Changing Human Reproduction. London: Sage.
19. Haimes, E. (1996) ‘What Counts as Ethnography? Studying Assisted Conception over Time’, paper presented to the Society for the Study of Symbolic Interactionism, Nottingham, UK.
20. Haimes, E. (1998) ‘Gamete and Embryo Donation: Ethical Implications for Families’, Human Fertility 1: 30–34.
21. Haimes, E. and N. Timms (1985) Adoption, Identity and Social Policy. Aldershot: Gower.
22. Haimes, E. and R. Williams (1998) ‘Social Constructionism and the new Technologies of Reproduction’, pp. 132–146 in I. Velody and R. Williams (eds) The Politics of Constructionism. London: Sage.
23. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (1994) Donated Ovarian Tissue in Embryo Research and Assisted Conception: Public Consultation Document. London: HFEA.
24. Jenkins, R. (1992) Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.
25. Kauppi, N. (2000) The Politics of Embodiment. Bern: Peter Lang AG.
26. McNay, L. (1999) ‘Gender, Habitus and the Field’, Theory, Culture & Society 16(1): 95–117.
27. McNay, L. (2000) Gender and Agency. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28. McNeil, M., I. Varcoe and S. Yearley (eds) (1990) The New Reproductive Technologies. London: Macmillan.
29. Rose, N. (1998) Inventing Our Selves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Stacey, M. (ed.) (1992) Changing Human Reproduction. London: Sage.
31. Strathern, M. (1992) Reproducing the Future. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
32. Strathern, M. (1996) ‘Enabling Identity? Biology, Choice and the New Reproductive Technologies’, pp. 37–52 in S. Hall and P. du Gay (eds) Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage.
33. Taylor, C. (1993) ‘To Follow a Rule…’, pp. 45–60 in C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma and M. Postone (eds) Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press.
34. Winter, I. (2000) Towards a Theorised Understanding of Family Life and Social Capital, Australian Institute of Family Studies, Working Paper 21. Melbourne, Australia.