Ordinal regression model and the linear regression model were superior to the logistic regression models

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 448-456

  Norris, Colleen M ^a   Ghali, William A ^b,c   Saunders, L Duncan ^a   Brant, Rollin ^c   Galbraith, Diane ^b,c   Faris, Peter ^c   Knudtson, Merril L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; Outcomes research; Regression models

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL; LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODEL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ORDINAL REGRESSION MODEL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SEATTLE ANGINA QUESTIONNAIRE; AGE DISTRIBUTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; SEX RATIO; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEX DISTRIBUTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33745295543     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Berzon R. Understanding and using health-related quality of life instruments within clinical research studies. In: Staquet M.J., Hays R.D., and Fayers P.M. (Eds). Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: methods and practice (1998), Oxford University Press, Oxford 3-15
2. Revicki D., and Leidy N. Questionnaire scaling: models and issues. In: Staquet M.J., Hays R.D., and Fayers P.M. (Eds). Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: methods and practice (1998), Oxford University Press, Oxford 157-168
3. Fayers P., and Machin D. Factor analysis. In: Staquet M.J., Hays R.D., and Fayers P.M. (Eds). Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: methods and practice (1998), Oxford University Press, Oxford 191-223
4. Spertus J.A., Winder J.A., Dewhurst T.A., Deyo R.A., Prodzinski J., and McDonell M. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 25 (1995) 333-341
5. Mapi Research Institute. Cultural adaptation of quality of life (QOL) instruments by Mapi Research Institute. Qual Life Newsl 23 (1999)
6. Norris C.M., Ghali W.A., Saunders L.D., Brant R., and Galbraith P.D. Systematic review of statistical methods used to analyze Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores. Can J Cardiol 20 (2004) 187-193
7. Ghali W.A., and Knudtson M.L. on behalf of the APPROACH investigators. Overview of the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease. Can J Cardiol 16 (2000) 1225-1230
8. Norris C.M., and Ghali W.A. Association between CAD treatment and the likelihood of "Best-responses" on the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Qual Life Res 8 (1999) 599
9. Smith L.R., Harrel Jr. F.E., Rankin J.S., Califf J.M., Pryor D.B., Muhlbaier L.H., Lee K.L., Mark D.B., Jones R.H., Oldham H.N., Glower D.D., Reves J.G., and Sabiston Jr. D.C. Determinants of early versus late cardiac death in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 84 Suppl III (1991) III-245-III-253
10. Babyak M.A.P. What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosomat Med 66 (2004) 411-421
11. Kleinbaum D.G., Kupper L.L., Muller K.E., and Nizam A. Applied regression analysis and multivariable methods. 3rd ed. (1998), Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA
12. Altman D.G. Practical statistics for medical research (1997), Chapman & Hall, London
13. Shwartz M., and Ash A. Evaluating the performance of risk-adjustment methods: continuous outcomes. In: Iezzoni L.I. (Ed). Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes. 2nd ed. (1997), Health Administration Press, Chicago
14. In: Iezzoni L.I. (Ed). Risk adjustment for measuring healthcare outcomes. 2nd ed. Association for Health Services Research (1997), Health Administration Press, Chicago
15. Hosmer D., and Hosmer T. A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med 16 (1997) 965-980
16. Hosmer D.W., and Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. (2000), Wiley-Interscience, New York
17. Scott S., Goldberg M., and Mayo N. Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies. J. Clin Epidemiol 50 (1997) 45-55
18. Deddens J.A., and Petersen M.R. Re: "Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes". [Letter]. Am J Epidemiol 159 (2004) 213-214 author reply 214-5
19. Flanders W.D., and Rhodes P.H. Large sample confidence intervals for regression standardized risks, risk ratios, and risk differences. J Chronic Dis 40 (1987) 697-704
20. McNutt L.A., Wu C., Xue X., and Hafner J.P. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol 157 (2003) 940-943