Antecedents and consequences of group-based guilt: The effects of ingroup identification

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 325-338

  Doosje, Bertjan E J ^a   Branscombe, Nyla R ^b   Spears, Russell ^a,c   Manstead, Antony S R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Collective guilt; Group based emotion; Ingroup identification; Reparation

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745286813     PISSN: 13684302     EISSN: 14617188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1368430206064637     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Augoustinos, M., & LeCouteur, A. (2004). On whether to apologize to indigenous Australians: The denial of white guilt. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 236-261). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Barkan, E. (2000). The guilt of nations: Restitution and negotiating historical injustices. New York: Norton.
3. Branscombe, N. R. (1998). Thinking about one's gender group's privileges and disadvantages: Consequences for well-being in women and men. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 167-184.
4. Branscombe, N. R., Doosje, B., & McGarty, C. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of group-based guilt. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 49-66). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
5. Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
6. Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1991). The positive social and self concept consequences of sport team identification. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 15, 115-127.
7. Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641-657.
8. Doosje, B., & Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Attributions for the negative historical actions of a group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 235-248.
9. Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R, & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one's group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872-886.
10. Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.
11. Doosje, B., Spears, R., & Koomen, W. (1995). When bad isn't all bad: The strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 642-655.
12. Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Reynolds, K. J., & Doosje, B. (2002). From personal pictures in the head to group-based tools in the world: How shared stereotypes allow groups to represent and manage social reality. In C. McGarty, V. Y. Yzerbyt, & R. Spears (Eds.), Stereotyping and explanation: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups (pp. 157-185). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Hornsey, M. J., Oppes, T., & Svensson, A. (2002). 'It's OK if we say it, but you can't': Responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 293-307.
14. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 395-409.
15. Lorge, I. (1936). Prestige, suggestion, and attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 386-402.
16. Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-616.
17. Mackie, D. M., Gastardo-Conaco, M. C., & Skelly, J. J. (1992). Knowledge of the advocated position and the processing of ingroup and outgroup persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 145-151.
18. Mackie, D. M., Worth, L. T., & Asuncion, A. G. (1990). Processing of persuasive ingroup messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 812-822.
19. McGarty, C., & Bliuc, A.-M. (2004). Refining the meaning of the 'collective' in collective guilt: Harm, guilt and apology in Australia. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 112-129). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Minow, M. (1998). Between vengeance and forgiveness: Facing history after genocide and mass atrocities. Boston: Beacon Press.
21. Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313-344.
22. Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553.
23. Stangor, C., & Ford, T. E. (1992). Accuracy and expectancy-confirming processing orientations and the development of stereotypes and prejudice. European Review of Social Psychology, 3, 57-89.
24. Swim, J. K., & Miller, D. L. (1999). White guilt: Its antecedents and consequences for attitudes toward affirmative action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 500-514.
25. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
26. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
27. Wetherell, M. (1987). Social identity and group polarization. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 142-170). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.