Differentiation of cognitive abilities as a function of neuroticism level: A measurement equivalence/invariance analysis

Intelligence

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 403-417

  Bonaccio, Silvia ^a   Reeve, Charlie L ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive abilities; Differentiation hypothesis; Intelligence; Intelligence personality associations; Measurement equivalence invariance; Neuroticism; Personality

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745282723     PISSN: 01602896     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2005.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abad F.J., Colom R., Juan-Espinosa M., and García L.F. Intelligence differentiation in adult samples. Intelligence 31 (2003) 157-166
2. Ackerman P.L., and Heggestad E.D. Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin 121 (1997) 219-245
3. Arbuckle J.L., and Wothke W. Amos 4.0 user's guide (1996), SmallWaters Corporation, Chicago, IL
4. Austin E.J., Deary I.J., and Gibson G.J. Relationships between ability and personality: Three hypotheses tested. Intelligence 25 (1997) 49-70
5. Austin E.J., Deary I.J., Whiteman M.C., Fowkes F.G.R., Pedersen N.L., Rabbitt P., et al. Relationships between ability and personality: Does intelligence contribute positively to personal and social adjustment?. Personality and Individual Differences 32 (2002) 1391-1411
6. Austin E.J., Hofer S.M., Deary I.J., and Eber H.W. Interactions between intelligence and personality: Results from two large samples. Personality and Individual Differences 29 (2000) 405-427
7. Bagozzi R.P., and Edwards J.R. A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods 1 (1998) 45-87
8. Balinsky B. An analysis of the mental factors of various age groups from nine to sixty. Genetic Psychology Monographs 23 (1941) 191-234
9. Barrick M.R., and Mount M.K. The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 44 (1991) 1-26
10. c. Intelligence 31 (2003) 275-287
11. Bentler P.M. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107 (1990) 238-246
12. Bentler P.M., and Bonnett D.G. Significance test and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 88 (1980) 588-606
13. Bollen K.A., and Long J.S. Testing structural equation models (1993), Sage, Newbury Park, CA
14. Brand C.R. How many dimensions of personality? The "Big 5", the "gigantic 3" or the "comprehensive 6"?. Psychologica Belgica 34 (1994) 257-273
15. Browne M.W., and Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research 21 (1992) 230-258
16. Byrne B.M. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (2001), Lawrence Earlbaum, Manwah, NJ
17. Carlstedt B. Differentiation of cognitive abilities as a function of level of general intelligence: A latent variable approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research 36 (2000) 589-609
18. Carroll J.B. Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies (1993), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
19. Chamorro-Premuzic T., and Furnham A. A possible model for understanding the personality-intelligence interface. British Journal of Psychology 95 (2004) 249-264
20. Chamorro-Premuzic T., and Furnham A. Personality and intellectual competence (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum, Manwah, NJ
21. Demetriou A., Kyriakides L., and Avraamidou C. The missing link in relations between intelligence and personality. Journal of Research in Personality 37 (2003) 547-581
22. Detterman D.K., and Daniel M.H. Correlations of mental tests with each other and with cognitive variables are highest for low IQ groups. Intelligence 13 (1989) 349-359
23. Dunning D., Heath C., and Suls J.M. Flawed self-assessment: Implications for heath, education and the work place. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 5 (2004) 69-106
24. Eysenck H.J. The biological basis of personality (1967), Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL
25. Eysenck H.J. Personality and intelligence: Psychometric and experimental approaches. In: Sternberg R., and Ruzgis P. (Eds). Personality and intelligence (1994), Plenum, New York 3-31
26. Eysenck H.J., and White P.O. Personality and the measurement of intelligence. British Journal of Educational Psychology 24 (1964) 197-201
27. Flanagan J.C., Dailey J.T., Shaycroft M.F., Gorham W.A., Orr D.B., and Goldberg I. Design for a study of American youth (1962), Houghton Mifflin, Boston
28. Flanagan J.C., Davis F.B., Dailey J.T., Shaycoft M.F., Orr D.B., Goldberg I., and Neyman C.A. The American high-school student. (Tech. Rep. No. 635) (1964), University of Pittsburg, Project TALENT Office, Pittsburg, PA
29. Garrett H.E. A developmental theory of intelligence. American Psychologist 1 (1946) 278-372
30. Gignac G.E. Openness to experience, general intelligence and crystallized intelligence: A methodological extension. Intelligence 33 (2005) 161-167
31. Gignac G.E., Stough C., and Loukotomis S. Openness, intelligence, and self-report intelligence. Intelligence 32 (2004) 133-143
32. Goldberg L.R. A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In: Mervielde I., Deary I., De Fruyt F., and Ostendorf F. (Eds). Personality psychology in Europe Vol. 7 (1999), Tilburg University Press, Tilburg, The Netherlands 7-28
33. Gustafsson J.-E. Hierarchical models of intelligence and educational achievement. In: Demetriou A., and Efklides A. (Eds). Intelligence, mind, and reasoning: Structure and development (1994), Elsevier Science, Amsterdam 45-73
34. Gustafsson J.-E., and Balke G. General and narrow abilities as predictors of school achievement. Multivariate Behavioral Research 28 (1993) 407-434
35. Harris J.A. Measured intelligence, achievement, openness to experience, and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences 36 (2004) 913-929
36. Horn J.L., and McArdle J.J. A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research 18 (1992) 117-144
37. Howard P.J., and Howard J.M. The workplace Big Five profile professional manual (2001), Center for Applied Cognitive Studies, Charlotte, NC
38. Hu L., and Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6 (1999) 1-55
39. James L.R. Measurement of personality via conditional reasoning. Organizational Research Methods 1 (1998) 131-163
40. Jensen A.R. The g factor: The science of mental ability (1998), Praeger, Westport, CT
41. Juan-Espinoza M., García L.F., Escorial S., Rebollo I., Colom R., and Abad F.J. Age differentiation hypothesis: Evidence from the WAIS III. Intelligence 30 (2002) 395-408
42. Lienert G.A. Die Faktorenstruktur der Intelligenz als Funktion des Neurotizismus. Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie 10 (1963) 140-159
43. MacCallum R.C., Browne M.W., and Sugawara H.M. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods 1 (1996) 130-149
44. c framework. In: Flanagan D.P., Genshaft J.L., and Harrison P. (Eds). Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (1997), Guilford Press, New York 151-179
45. Mount M.K., and Barrick M.R. The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resources management. In: Ferris G.R. (Ed). Research in personnel and human resources management Vol. 13 (1995), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT 153-200
46. Reeve C.L. Differential ability antecedents of general and specific dimensions of declarative knowledge: More than g. Intelligence 32 (2004) 621-652
47. Ruch W.W., and Stang S.W. Employee aptitude survey examiner's manual. (2nd ed.). (1994), Psychological Services Inc, Glendale, CA
48. Ruch W.W., Stang S.W., McKillip R.H., and Dye D.A. Employee aptitude survey technical manual. (2nd ed.). (2001), Psychological Services Inc, Glendale, CA
49. Schmid J., and Leiman J.M. The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrika 22 (1957) 53-61
50. Schulze R. Modeling structures of intelligence. In: Wilhelm O., and Engle R.W. (Eds). Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence (2005), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 241-264
51. Spearman C. The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement (1927), MacMillan, New York
52. Steiger, J.H., & Lind, J.M. (1980).Statistically based tests for the number of common factors.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
53. Tiedeman D.V. The project TALENT data bank: A handbook (1972), American Institutes for Research, Palo Alto, CA
54. Tucker L.R., and Lewis C. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38 (1973) 1-10
55. Vandenberg R.J., and Lance C.E. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods 3 (2000) 4-70
56. Wheaton B., Muthén B., Alwin D.F., and Summers G.F. Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology 8 (1977) 84-136
57. Wolff H.-G., and Preising K. Exploring item and higher order factor structure with the Schmid-Leiman solution: Syntax codes for SPSS and SAS. Behavior Research Methods 37 (2005) 48-58
58. Zeidner M. Personality trait correlates of intelligence. In: Saklofske D.H., and Zeidner M. (Eds). International handbook of personality and intelligence (1995), Plenum, New York 299-319