Effects of Presentation Interference in Learning with Visuals

Journal of Visual Literacy

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 41-68

  Bradshaw, Amy C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745274322     PISSN: 1051144X     EISSN: 23796529     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/23796529.2003.11674591     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. American Cancer Society (1994). Cancer Facts and Figures - 1994 (Annual Report). Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc.
2. American Cancer Society (1985). Fry Now. Pay Later (Brochure). American Cancer Society, Inc.
3. Aspillaga, M. (1991). Screen design: location of information and its effect on learning. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18(3), 89–92.
4. Bertoline, G. R., Burton, T. L. & Wiley, S. E. (1992). Technical graphics as a catalyst for developing visual literacy within general education. In Darrell Beauchamp and Judy Baca (Eds.) Visual communication: Bridging across culture. Selected readings from the 23rd annual conference of the International Visual Literacy Association, 243–257.
5. Bradshaw, A.C. (2000). Evaluating visuals for instruction. In Robert E. Griffin. W. Gibbs, and V. Williams (Eds.) Natural Vistas: Visual Literacy and the World Around Us. Loretto, PA: International Visual Literacy Association.
6. Bradshaw, A.C. (1999). Measuring the learning cost of presentation interference. In the 20th Annual AECT Proceedings of Selected Research and Development. Washington, DC: AECT Publications.
7. Bradshaw, A.C. (1996). Presentation interference in cross-cultural settings. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications Technology, Indianapolis, IN.
8. Dreyfus. J. (1985). A turning point in type design. Visual Language. 79 (1), 11 – 22.
9. Dwyer, F. M. (1994). One dimension of visual research: A paradigm and its implementation. In D. M. Moore & F. M. Dwyer (Eds.), Visual literacy: A spectrum of visual learning (pp. 383–401). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
10. Fischman, G. E. (2001). Reflections about images, visual culture, and educational research. Educational Researcher. 30(8), 28–33.
11. Fleming, M. & Levie, W. H. (1978). Instructional message design: Principles from the Behavioral Sciences. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications.
12. th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
13. Gay. L. R. (1992). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application_(4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
14. Grabinger, R. S. (1989). Screen layout design: Research into the overall appearance of the screen. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 75–183.
15. Grabinger, R. S. (1993). Computer screen designs: Viewer judgments. Educational Technology Research and Development. 41(2), 35–73.
16. Haag, B. B. & Snetsigner, W. (1994). Aesthetics screen design: An integration of principles. In Visual literacy in the digital age: Selected readings from the 25th annual conference of the International Visual Literacy Association, 92–97. IVLA
17. Hannafin, M. & Hooper, S. (1989). An integrated framework for CBI screen design and layout. Computers in Human Behavior, 5, 155–165.
18. Hannafin, M. & Peck, K. (1988). The design, development, and evaluation of instructional software. New York: Macmillan.
19. Hartley. J. (1978). Designing electronic text: The role of print-based research. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 35(1), 3–17.
20. Hathaway, M. D. (1984, January). Variables of computer screen display and how they affect learning. Educational Technology, 7–11.
21. Keyes, E. (1993). Typography, color, and information structure. Technical Communications, 40(4), 638–654.
22. Knupfer, N. N. (1994). Computers and visual learning. In D.M. Moore & F.M. Dwyer (Eds.), Visual literacy: A spectrum of visual learning (pp. 209–231). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications.
23. Knupfer, N. N. & Mclsaac, M. S. (1992). The effects of gray shades in instructional materials produced with desktop publishing software. In Visual communication: Bridging across cultures: Selected readings from the 23rd annual conference of the International Visual Literacy Association, 25–37. IVLA.
24. Mayer, R. E. (1984). Aids to text comprehension. Educational psychologist, 19, 30–42.
25. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. (1992). Mayo Clinic Family Health Book: Interactive Edition [Computer Software]. Interactive Ventures Inc.
26. Morrison, G., Ross, S. & O’Dell, J. (1991). Applications of research to the design of computer based instruction. In G. Anglin (Ed.) Instructional Technology: Past, Present, and Future, 188–194. Englewood, CO.: Libraries Unlimited. Inc.
27. Mourant. S. J., Lakshmanan, R. & Chantadisai, R. (1981). Visual fatigue and cathode ray tube display terminals. Human Factors, 23, 529–540.
28. Mukherjee, P. & Edmonds, G.S. (1994). Screen design: A review of research. In Visual literacy in the digital age: Selected readings from the 25th annual conference of the International Visual Literacy Association, 112–118. IVLA.
29. Neuman, D. (1991). Naturalistic inquiry and computer-based instruction: Rationale, procedures, and potential. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(3), 33–51.
30. Reiber, L. P. (1991). Effects of visual grouping strategies in computer-animated presentations on selective attention in science. Educational Technology Research Development 39(4) 5–15.
31. Pettersson, R. (1993). Visual information (second ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
32. Pettersson. R. (1994). Comprehensibility. In Nikos Metallinos (Ed.) Verbo-visual literacy: Understanding and applying new educational communication media technologies. Selected readings from the 1993 Symposium of the International Visual Literacy Association in Delphi, Greece, 243 – 260.
33. Ross, S. & Morrison, G. (1988). Adapting instruction to learner performance and background variables. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware (pp. 227 – 245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Sammons, M. C. (1995, May). Students assess computer-aided classroom presentations. T.H.E. Journal, 66–69.
35. Seels, B. (1994). Visual literacy: The definition problem. In D.M. Moore & F.M. Dwyer (Eds.), Visual literacy: A spectrum of visual learning (pp. 97–112). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
36. Soulier, J. S. (1988). The design and development of computer-based instruction. Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
37. Thuring, M., Hanneman, J. & Haake, J. M. (1995). Hypermedia and cognition: Designing for comprehension. Communication of the ACM, 38(8), 57–66.
38. Winn, W. & Solomon, C. (1993). The effect of the spatial arrangement of simple diagrams on the interpretation of English and nonsense sentences. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 29–41.