Social Science and Liberal Values in a Time of War

Perspectives on Politics

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 475-483

  Isaac, Jeffrey C ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745272689     PISSN: 15375927     EISSN: 15410986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1537592704040265     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2004. About the science and human rights program. shr.aaas.org/about.htm.
2. American Association of University Professors. 1987. Statement on professional ethics. http://www.aaup.org/statements/Redbook/Rbethics.htm.
3. American Political Science Association. 1998. A guide to professional ethics in political science. 3rd ed. www.apsanet.org/pubs/ethics.cfm.
4. American Political Science Association 2004. Constitution of the American Political Science Association. www.apsanet.org/about/governance/constitution.cfm.
5. American Studies Association. 2003. Intellectual freedom in a time of war. American Studies Association Newsletter 26 (1): 16. http://www.georgetown.edu/crossroads/AmericanStudiesAssn/newsletter/archive/pdf/asa_March_2003.pdf.
6. Bendix, Reinhard, and Guenther Roth. 1971. Scholarship and partisanship: Essays on Max Weber. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. Bennett, William J. 2002. Why we fight: Moral clarity and the war on terrorism. New York: Doubleday.
8. R.S., Bourne, Randolph Silliman, The radical will: Selected writings, 1911–1918, The state, Olaf, Hansen, New York, Urizen Books, (1977), 355-395
9. Brehm, Sharon Stephens. 2003. Statement of principles. Indiana University Bloomington, March 23.mypage.iu.edu/∼sbrehm/speeches/032403.shtml.
10. Calhoun, Craig, Paul Price, and Ashley Timmer, eds.2002. Understanding September 11. New York: New Press.
11. Cole, David. 2003. Enemy aliens. New York: New Press.
12. Columbia International Affairs Online. Special Section on U.S.Policy and Iraq. http://www.ciaonet.org/special_section/iraq/index_iraq.html.
13. Diamond, Larry. 2002. What political science owes the world.PS Online. www.apsanet.org/PS/post911/diamond.cfm.
14. Diggins, John Patrick. 1996. Max Weber: Politics and the spirit of tragedy. New York: Basic Books.
15. J.C., Farrell, John C., John Dewey and World War I: Armageddon tests a liberal's faith, Perspectives in American History, n.d., (1975), 9, 299-342
16. Fish, Stanley. 2003. A university is not a political party. Chronicle of Higher Education, January 23. http://chronicle.com/.
17. C., Forcey, Charles, The crossroads of liberalism: Croly, Weyl, Lippmann, and the Progressive Era, New York, Oxford University Press, (1961)
18. I., Katznelson, Ira, Desolation and enlightenment: Political knowledge after total war, totalitarianism, and the Holocaust, New York, Columbia University Press, (2003)
19. O'Neil, Robert M. 2003. Academic freedom, and national security in times of crisis. Academe 89 (3).www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/2003/03mj/03mjonei.htm.
20. R.D., Putnam, Robert D., T., Skocpol, Theda, Letter on behalf of the American Political Science Association to Mohammed Hosni Mubarak, August, www.apsanet.org/img/about/ethics/ibrahim2.pdf, (2002)
21. A., Sakharov, Andrei, On Sakharov, The responsibility of scientists, Alexander, Babyonyshev, trans. Guy, Daniels, New York, Vintage Books, (1982), 205-211
22. Sakharov, Andrei 1990. Memoirs, trans. Richard Lourie. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
23. C., Taylor, Charles, Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers 2, Neutrality in political science, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, (1985), 58-90
24. M., Weber, Max, From Max Weber: Essays in sociology, Science as a vocation, H. H., Gerth, C. Wright, Mills, Oxford, Oxford University Press, (1946), 129-156
25. M., Weber, Max, The methodology of the social sciences, The meaning of “ethical neutrality” in sociology and economics, Edward A., Shils, Henry A., Finch, New York, Free Press, (1949), 1-47
26. Wolin, Sheldon. 1981. Max Weber: Legitimation, method, and the politics of theory. Political Theory 9 (3):401–24.