Legal considerations in cosmetic laser surgery

Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 103-106

  Goldberg, David J ^a  

^a FORDHAM UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Lasers; Malpractice; Negligence

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; DERMATOLOGY; ESTHETIC SURGERY; EXPERT WITNESS; HUMAN; LASER SURGERY; LAW SUIT; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; NEGLIGENCE; NOTE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN PIGMENTATION; STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; TATTOO; UNITED STATES; VASCULAR LESION;

HUMANS; LASER THERAPY; MALPRACTICE; SURGERY, PLASTIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33745269810     PISSN: 14732130     EISSN: 14732165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2006.00234.x     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Furrow BF, Greaney TL, Johnson SH, Jost TS, Schwartz RL. Liability in Health Care Law, 3rd edn. St. Paul, MN: West PublishingCo.; 1997.
2. Hyams AL, Shapiro DW, Brennan TA. Medical practice guidelines in malpractice litigation: An early retrospective. J Health Polit Policy Law 1996; 21: 289-313.
3. Lamont v. Brookwood Health Service, Inc., 446 So.2d 1018 (Ala. 1983).
4. Gannon v. Elliot, 19 Cal.App. 4th 1 (1993).
5. Coburn v. Seda, 101 Wash. 2d 270 (1984).
6. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. s301.