Labor dystocia and its association with interpregnancy interval

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 195, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 121-128

  Zhu, Bao Ping ^a   Grigorescu, Violanda ^b   Le, Thu ^b   Lin, Mei ^a   Copeland, Glenn ^b   Barone, Maurice ^b   Turabelidze, George ^a  

^a MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SENIOR SERVICES   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Dystocia; Interpregnancy interval

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DATA ANALYSIS; DOSE RESPONSE; DYSTOCIA; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INFANCY; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; LABOR; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD; MOTHER; MULTIPARA; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SCHOOL CHILD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIRTH WEIGHT; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LOGISTIC MODELS; MATERNAL AGE; MICHIGAN; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PREVALENCE; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33745265248     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.12.016     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. World Health Organization. The World Health Report, 2005: make every mother and child count (2005), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
2. Gardella C., Taylor M., Benedetti T., Hitti J., and Critchlow C. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185 (2001) 896-902
3. Towner D., Castro M.A., Eby-Wilkens E., and Gilbert W.M. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med 341 (1999) 1709-1714
4. Johnson J.H., Figueroa R., Garry D., Elimian A., and Maulik D. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 103 (2004) 513-518
5. Koroukian S.M. Relative risk of postpartum complications in the Ohio Medicaid population: vaginal versus cesarean delivery. Med Care Res Rev 61 (2004) 203-224
6. Wen S.W., Liu S., Kramer M.S., Marcoux S., Ohlsson A., Sauve R., et al. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries. Am J Epidemiol 153 (2001) 103-107
7. Konje J.C., and Ladipo O.A. Nutrition and obstructed labor. Am J Clin Nutr 72 (2000) 291S-297S
8. Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities. International classification of diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification (1992), Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities, Ann Arbor (MI)
9. Skjaerven R., Wilcox A.J., and Lie R.T. The interval between pregnancies and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 346 (2002) 33-38
10. Zhu B.P., Haines K.M., Le T., McGrath-Miller K., and Boulton M.L. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes among white and black women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185 (2001) 1403-1410
11. Zhu B.P., and Le T. Effect of interpregnancy interval on infant low birth weight: a retrospective cohort study using the Michigan Maternally Linked Birth Database. Matern Child Health J 7 (2003) 169-178
12. Zhu B.P., Rolfs R.T., Nangle B.E., and Horan J.M. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes. N Engl J Med 340 (1999) 589-594
13. Pre-release Draft, June 2003: International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM). 2003. Last accessed: October 14, 2005; available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/otheract/icd9/icd10cm.htm.
14. Ventura S.J., Martin J.A., Curtin S.C., and Mathews T.J. Report of final natality statistics, 1995. Monthly Vital Statistics Report 45 suppl (1997) 15
15. Kotelchuck M. The Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index: its US distribution and association with low birthweight. Am J Public Health 84 (1994) 1486-1489
16. Hosmer D.W.J., and Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. (2000), John Wiley, New York
17. Watier L., Richardson S., and Hemon D. Accounting for pregnancy dependence in epidemiologic studies of reproductive outcomes. Epidemiology 8 (1997) 629-636
18. Zeger S.L., Liang K.Y., and Albert P.S. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 44 (1988) 1049-1060
19. Dystocia. eMedicine, 2004. Last accessed October 14, 2005; available at: http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic3280.htm.
20. Shipp T.D., Zelop C.M., Repke J.T., Cohen A., and Lieberman E. Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 97 (2001) 175-177
21. Bujold E., Mehta S.H., Bujold C., and Gauthier R.J. Interdelivery interval and uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187 (2002) 1199-1202
22. Conde-Agudelo A., and Belizan J.M. Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: cross sectional study. BMJ 321 (2000) 1255-1259
23. Miller J.E. Birth intervals and perinatal health: an investigation of three hypotheses. Fam Plann Perspect 23 (1991) 62-70
24. Winkvist A., Rasmussen K.M., and Habicht J.P. A new definition of maternal depletion syndrome. Am J Public Health 82 (1992) 691-694
25. Alexander G.R., Tompkins M.E., Petersen D.J., Hulsey T.C., and Mor J. Discordance between LMP-based and clinically estimated gestational age: implications for research, programs, and policy. Public Health Rep 110 (1995) 395-402
26. Parrish K.M., Holt V.L., Connell F.A., Williams B., and Lo Gerfo J.P. Variations in the accuracy of obstetric procedures and diagnoses on birth records in Washington State, 1989. Am J Epidemiol 138 (1993) 119-127