Portlet syndication: Raising variability concerns

ACM Transactions on Internet Technology

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 627-659

  Diaz, Oscar ^a   Rodriguez, Juan J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^b LKS S Coop ^*  (Spain)

Author keywords

Portal applications; Portlet; Product lines

Indexed keywords

PORTAL APPLICATIONS; PORTLET; PRODUCT LINES;

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; INTEROPERABILITY; PORTALS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 33745259007     PISSN: 15335399     EISSN: 15335399     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1111627.1111630     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ABDELNUR A. AND HEPPER S. 2003. JSR 168, Java specification request for Portlet API. Available at http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=168.
2. APACHE FOUNDATION. 2003. The Apache Cocoon Project. Available at http://cocoon.apache.org.
3. BASSETT, P. 1997. Framing Software ReuseLessons from Real World. Yourdon Press, Prentice Hall.
4. BECKER, M., GEYER, L., GILBERT, A., AND BECKER, K. 2002. Comprehensive variability modelling to facilitate efficent variability treatment. In 4th International Workshop on Product Family Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2290. Springer Verlag.
5. BELLAS, F. 2004. Standars for second-generation portals. IEEE Internet Comput. 8, 2, 54-60.
6. BONNET, P. AND BARRIOLADE, C. 2002. Toward a new infraestructure for collaboration between enterprises. Available at http://www.orchestranetworks.com/en/ocs/0109.whitepaper.cfm.
7. BUTLER, G. 1997. Quality and reuse in industrial sofware engineering. In Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference and International Computer Science Conference. IEEE Computer Society Press, 3-12.
8. CLAUSS, M. 2001. Modelling variability with UML. In Proceedings of Young Researchers Workshop GCSE'01, the 3rd International Symposium on Generative and Component-Based Software Engineering. Enfurt, Germany.
9. CLEMENCE, P. AND NORTHROP, L. 2002. Software Product Lines-Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley.
10. DIAZ, O., TRUJILLO, S., AND AZPEITIA, I. 2003. User-facing Web service development: A case for a product-line approach. In Proceedings of 4th VLDB Workshop on Technologies for E-Services (VLDB-TES), B. Benatallah and M. Shan, Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2819, Springer Verlag, 66-77.
11. GRISS, M. L. 2000. Implementing Product-Line Features with Component Reuse. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Software Reuse. Vienna, Austria, 137-152.
12. HALMENS, G. AND POHL, K. 2003. Communicating the variability of a software-product family to customers. Softw. Syst. Model. 2, 1, 15-36.
13. J. VAN GURP, J. B. AND SVAHNBERG, M. 2001. On the notion of variability in software product lines. In Proceedings of 2nd Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture WICSA. IEEE Computer Society, 45-54.
14. JACOBSON, I., GRISS, M., AND JONSSON, P. 1997. Software Reuse: Architecture, Process and Oranization for Business success, Addison-Wesley.
15. JARING, M. AND BOSCH, J. 2002. Representing variability in software product lines: A case study. In 2nd Software Product Line Conference (SPLC2). San Diego, CA. 15-36.
16. JARZABEK, S., ONG, W. C., AND ZHANG, H. 2003. Handling variant requirements in domain modeling. J. Syst. Softw. 68, 3, 171-182.
17. JARZABEK, S. AND SEVIORA, R. 2000. Engineering components for ease of customisation and evolution. IEE Proc.-Softw. 147, 6 (Dec.), 237-247.
18. KANG, K. 1998. FORM: A feature-oriented reuse method with domain specific architectures. Annals Softw. Eng. 5, 345-355.
19. KANG, K. C., COHEN, S. G., HESS, J. A., NOVAK, W. E., AND PETERSON, A. S. 1997. Feature oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study. Tech. rep., CMU/SEI90TR21 Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
20. KAPPEL, G., PRLL, B., RETSCHITZEGGER, W., AND SCHWINGER. 2003. Customisation for ubiquitous Web applications: A comparison of approaches. Int. J. Web Eng. Techn. 1, 79-111.
21. KICZALES, G., LAMPING, J., MENHDHEKAR, A., MAEDA, C., LOPES, C., LOINGTIER, J.-M., AND IRWIN, J. 1997. Aspect-oriented programming. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, M. Akşit and S. Matsuoka, Eds. Vol. 1241. Springer-Verlag, 220-242.
22. LINDERMAN, M. 2002. Making mistakes well: Increase online revenue with contingency design. New Architect 7, 9 (Sept.), 32-34.
23. M. SVAHNBERG, J. v. G. AND BOSCH, J. 2003. A taxonomy of variability realization Techniques. Tech. rep., Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden. Available at http://www.cs.rug.nl/Research/ SE/publications/Variability_taxonomy.pdf.
24. M. L. GRISS, J. F. AND D'ALESSANDRO, M. 1998. Integrating feature modeling with the RSEB. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Software Reuse. Vancouver, BC, Canada, 76-85.
25. OASIS. 2003. Web service for remote portals (WSRP) Version 1.0. Available at http://www.oasis-open.org/commitees/wsrp/.
26. R. CAPILLA, J. D. 2002. Modelling variability with features in distributed architectures. In 4th International Workshop on Product Family Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2290. Springer Verlag.
27. RESHEF, E. 2002. Building interactive web services with WSIA & WSRP. Web Services J. 6, 12 (Dec.), 2-6. Available at http://www.sys-con.com/webservices/article.cfm?id=415.
28. W3c. 1998. Cascading Style Sheet (CSS). Available at http://wwww.w3c.org/Style/CSS/.
29. WONG, S. 2001. Web services: The next evolution of application integration. Available at http://e-serv.ebizq.net/wbs/wong_1.html.