Symmetry breaking in interspecific Drosophila hybrids is not due to developmental noise

Evolution

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 746-761

  Rego, Carla ^a   Matos, Margarida ^a   Santos, Mauro ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Canalization; Developmental stability; Drosophila madeirensis; Drosophila subobscura; Fluctuating asymmetry; Geometric morphometrics; Interspecific hybrids; Quantitative genetics

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; FLY; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; SYMMETRY; WING MORPHOLOGY;

DROSOPHILA MADEIRENSIS; DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROSS BREEDING; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; FORELIMB; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MALE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MORPHOGENESIS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; CROSSES, GENETIC; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENES, INSECT; GENETICS, POPULATION; MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, GENETIC; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VARIATION (GENETICS); WING;

EID: 33745255709     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/05-540.1     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Adams, D. C., F. J. Rohlf, and D. E. Slice. 2004. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the 'revolution.' Ital. J. Zool. 71:5-16.
2. Alibert, P., and J.-C. Auffray. 2003. Genomic coadaptation, outbreeding depression, and developmental instability. Pp. 116-134 in M. Polak, ed. Developmental instability: causes and consequences. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
3. Becker, W. A. 1984. Manual of quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Academic Enterprises, Pullman, WA.
4. Becskei, A., B. B. Kaufmann, and A. van Oudenaarden. 2005. Contributions of low molecular number and chromosomal positioning to stochastic gene expression. Nat. Genet. 37:937-944.
5. Berger, J. O. 2003. Could Fisher, Jeffreys, and Neyman have agreed on testing? Stat. Sci. 18:1-32.
6. Blake, W. J., M. Kærn, C. R. Cantor, and J. J. Collins. 2003. Noise in eukaryotic gene expression. Nature 422:633-637.
7. Bookstein, F. L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
8. _. 1996. Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. Bull. Math. Biol. 58:313-365.
9. Coyne, J. A., and A. H. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
10. Debat, V., and P. David. 2001. Mapping phenotypes: canalization, plasticity and developmental stability. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:555-561.
11. Debat, V., P. Alibert, P. David, E. Paradis, and J.-C. Auffray. 2000. Independence between developmental stability and canalization in the skull of the house mouse. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:423-430.
12. Debat, V., M. Bégin, H. Legout, and J. R. David. 2003. Allometric and nonallometric components of Drosophila wing shape respond differently to developmental temperature. Evolution 57:2773-2784.
13. Dryden, I. L., and K. V. Mardia. 1998. Statistical shape analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, U.K.
14. Dworkin, I. 2005a. Canalization, cryptic variation and developmental buffering: a critical examination and analytical perspective. Pp. 131-158 in B. Hallgrimsson and B. K. Hall, eds. Variation: a central concept in biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
15. _. 2005b. A study of canalization and developmental stability in the sternopleural bristle system of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 59:1500-1509.
16. Edgington, E. S. 1995. Randomization tests. 3rd ed. Marcel Dekker, New York.
17. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, Harlow, U.K.
18. Fernández Iriarte, P., W. Céspedes, and M. Santos. 2003. Quantitative-genetic analysis of wing form and bilateral asymmetry in isochromosomal lines of Drosophila subobscura using Procrustes methods. J. Genet. 82:95-113.
19. Gavrilets, S. 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
20. Gibson, G., and G. P. Wagner. 2000. Canalization in evolutionary theory: A stabilizing theory? Bioessays 22:372-380.
21. Goodall, C. 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 53:285-339.
22. Haldane, J. B. S. 1922. Sex ratio and universal sterility in animal hybrids. J. Genet. 12:101-109.
23. Hornstein, E., and C. J. Tabin. 2005. Developmental biology: asymmetrical threat averted. Nature 435:155-156.
24. Jolliffe, I. T. 1986. Principal component analysis. Springer Verlag, New York.
25. Kærn, M., T. E. Elston, W. J. Blake, and J. J. Collins. 2005. Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6:451-464.
26. Kawakami, Y., A. Raya, R. M. Raya, C. Rodríguez-Esteban, and J. C. Izpisúa Belmonte. 2005. Retinoic acid signalling links left-right asymmetric patterning and bilaterally symmetric somitogenesis in the zebrafish embryo. Nature 435:165-171.
27. Khadem, M., and C. B. Krimbas. 1991. Studies of the species barrier between Drosophila subobscura and D. madeirensis. I. The genetics of male hybrid sterility. Heredity 67:157-165.
28. _. 1993. Studies of the species barrier between Drosophila subobscura and D. madeirensis. III. How universal are the rules of speciation? Heredity 70:353-361.
29. _. 1997. Studies of the species barrier between Drosophila subobscura and Drosophila madeirensis. IV. A genetic dissection of the X cromosome for speciation genes. J. Evol. Biol. 10:909-920.
30. Khadem, M., J. Rozas, C. Segarra, A. Brehm, and A. Aguadé. 1998. Tracing the colonization of Madeira and the Canary Islands by Drosophila subobscura through the study of the rp49 gene region. J. Evol. Biol. 11:439-452.
31. Klingenberg, C. P. 2003. A developmental perspective on developmental instability: theory, models, and mechanisms. Pp. 14-34 in M. Polak, ed. Developmental instability: causes and consequences. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
32. _. 2004. Dominance, nonlinear developmental mapping and developmental stability. Pp. 37-51 in R. A. Veitia, ed. The biology of genetic dominance. Landes Bioscience, Austin, TX.
33. Klingenberg, C. P., and G. S. McIntyre. 1998. Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods. Evolution 52:1363-1375.
34. Klingenberg, C. P., M. Barluenga, and A. Meyer. 2002. Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56:1909-1920.
35. Knapp, S. J., W. C. Bridges Jr., and M.-H. Yang. 1989. Nonparametric confidence interval estimators for heritability and expected selection response. Genetics 121:891-898.
36. Leamy, L. 1984. Morphometric studies in inbred and hybrid house mice. V. Directional and fluctuating asymmetry. Am. Nat. 123:579-593.
37. Leamy, L., and C. P. Klingenberg. 2005. The genetics and evolution of fluctuating asymmetry. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36:1-21.
38. Leamy, L. J., E. J. Routman, and J. M. Cheverud. 1997. A search for quantitative trait loci affecting asymmetry of mandibular characters in mice. Evolution 51:957-969.
39. Levin, M. 2005. Left-right asymmetry in embryonic development: a comprehensive review. Mech. Dev. 122:3-25.
40. Ligoxygakis, P., M. Strigini, and M. Averof. 2001. Specification of left-right asymmetry in the embryonic gut of Drosophila. Development 128:1171-1174.
41. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetic analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
42. Mardia, K. V., F. L. Bookstein, and I. J. Moreton. 2000. Statistical assessment of bilateral symmetry of shapes. Biometrika 87:285-300.
43. Markow, T. A. 1995. Evolutionary ecology and developmental instability. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40:105-120.
44. Markow, T. A., and J. P. Ricker. 1991. Developmental stability in hybrids between the sibling species pair, Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Genetica 84:115-121.
45. MathWorks. 2005a. MATLAB. Ver. 7.0.4. MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA. Available via http://www.mathworks.com.
46. _. 2005b. Statistics toolbox for use with MATLAB, Ver. 5.0.2. MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA. Available via http://www.mathworks.com.
47. Matos, M., M. R. Rose, M. T. Rocha Pité, C. Rego, and T. Avelar. 2000. Adaptation to the laboratory environment in Drosophila subobscura. J. Evol. Biol. 13:9-19.
48. Matos, M., T. Avelar, and M. R. Rose. 2002. Variation in the rate of convergent evolution: adaptation to a laboratory environment in Drosophila subobscura. J. Evol. Biol. 15:673-682.
49. Michalak, P., and M. A. F. Noor. 2003. Genome-wide patterns of expression in Drosophila pure species and hybrid males. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:1070-1076.
50. Milton, C. C., B. Huynh, P. Batterham, S. L. Rutherford, and A. A. Hoffmann. 2003. Quantitative trait asymmetry independent of Hsp90 buffering: distinct modes of genetic canalization and developmental stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:13396-13401.
51. Mitchell-Olds, T., and J. Bergelson. 1990. Statistical genetics of an annual plant, Impatiens capensis. I. Genetic basis of quantitative variation. Genetics 124:407-415.
52. Monclús, M. 1984. Drosophilidae of Madeira, with the description of Drosophila madeirensis n. sp. Z. Zool. Syst. Evolutions for sch. 22:94-103.
53. Nijhout, H. F. 2004. Stochastic gene expression: dominance, thresholds and boundaries. Pp. 81-95 in R. A. Veitia, ed. The biology of genetic dominance. Landes Bioscience, Austin, TX.
54. Noor, M. A. F. 2005. Patterns of evolution of genes disrupted in expression in Drosophila species hybrids. Genet. Res. 85:119-125.
55. Orr, H. A., L. D. Madden, J. A. Coyne, R. Goodwin, and R. S. Hawley. 1997. The developmental genetics of hybrid inviability: a mitotic defect in Drosophila hybrids. Genetics 145:1031-1040.
56. Palmer, A. R. 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry: a primer. Pp. 335-354 in T. A. Markow, ed. Developmental instability: its origins and evolutionary implications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. A pdf version with corrections is available via http://www.biology.ualberta.ca/ oldpsite/palmer.hp//PubList.htm#publications.
57. _. 2004. Symmetry breaking and the evolution of development. Science 306:828-833.
58. Palmer, A. R., and C. Strobeck. 1986. Fluctuating asymmetry: measurement, analysis, patterns. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17:391-421.
59. _. 2003. Fluctuating asymmetry analyses revisited. Pp. 279-319 in M. Polak, ed. Developmental instability: causes and consequences. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
60. Papaceit, M., J. San Antonio, and A. Prevosti. 1991. Genetic analysis of extra sex combs in the hybrids between Drosophila subobscura and D. madeirensis. Genetica 84:107-114.
61. Pélabon, C., M. L. Carlson, T. F. Hansen, N. G. Yoccoz, and W. S. Armbruster. 2004. Consequences of inter-population crosses on developmental stability and canalization of floral traits in Dalechampia scandens (Euphorbiaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 17:19-32.
62. Queitsch, C., T. A. Sangster, and S. Lindquist. 2002. Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation. Nature 417:618-624.
63. Ramos-Onsins, S., C. Segarra, J. Rozas, and M. Aguadé. 1998. Molecular and chromossomal phylogeny in the obscura group of Drosophila inferred from sequences of the rp49 gene region. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:33-41.
64. Ranz, J. M., K. Namgyal, G. Gibson, and D. L. Hartl. 2004. Anomalies in the expression profile of interspecific hybrids of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genet. Res. 14:373-379.
65. Raya, A., and J. C. Izpisúa Belmonte. 2004. Sequential transfer of left-right information during vertebrate embryo development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14:575-581.
66. Roff, D. A., and T. A. Mousseau. 1987. Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila. Heredity 58:103-118.
67. Rohlf, F. J. 1999. Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. J. Classif. 16:197-223.
68. Russo, C. A. M., N. Takezaki, and M. Nei. 1995. Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of drosophilid species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:391-404.
69. Rutherford, S. L., and S. Lindquist. 1998. Hsp90 as a capacitor of morphological evolution. Nature 396:336-342.
70. Santos, M. 2001. Fluctuating asymmetry is nongenetically related to mating success in Drosophila buzzatii. Evolution 55:2248-2256.
71. _. 2002. Genetics of wing size asymmetry in Drosophila buzzatii. J. Evol. Biol. 15:720-734.
72. Santos, M., P. Fernández Iriarte, and W. Céspedes. 2005. Genetics and geometry of canalization and developmental stability in Drosophila subobscura. BMC Evol. Biol. 5:7.
73. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry. 3rd ed. W. H. Freeman, New York.
74. Stige, L. C., B. David, and P. Alibert. 2006. On hidden heterogeneity in directional asymmetry. Can systematic bias be avoided? J. Evol. Biol. 19:492-499.
75. SPSS. 2004. SPSS for Windows. Ver. 13. SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL. Available via http://www.spss.com.
76. StatSoft. 2003. STATISTICA: data analysis software system. Ver. 6. StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK. Available via http://www.statsoft.com.
77. Turelli, M., and H. A. Orr. 1995. The dominance theory of Haldane's rule. Genetics 140:389-402.
78. _. 2000. Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154:1663-1679.
79. Waddington, C. H. 1942. Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature 150:563-565.
80. _. 1952. Selection of the genetic basis for an acquired character. Nature 169:625-626.
81. _. 1957. The strategy of the genes. MacMillan, New York.
82. Willmore, K. E., C. P. Klingenberg, and B. Hallgrímsson. 2005. The relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and environmental variance in rhesus macaque skulls. Evolution 59:898-909.
83. Zelditch, M. L., D. L. Swiderski, H. D. Sheets, and W. L. Fink. 2004. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam.