An expansion and modification of the information, motivation, and behavioral skills model: Implications from a study with African American girls and their mothers

Comprehensive Child and Adolescent Nursing

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 89-101

  Aronowitz, Teri ^a   Munzert, Tracie ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745252167     PISSN: 01460862     EISSN: 1521043X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01460860600677601     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aronowitz, T. (2002). The impact of time perspective on resilience in at risk African American youth. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 1263 (UNI No. 3045859).
2. Aronowitz, T., & Morrison-Beedy, D. (2004). Resilience in impoverished African American girls: The role of mother-daughter connectedness. Research in Nursing & Health, 29, 29-39.
3. Aronowitz, T., Rennells, R., & Todd, E. (2005). Heterosocial behaviors in early adolescent African American girls: The role of mother-daughter relationships. Journal of Family Nursing, 11, 122-139.
4. Aronowitz, T., Rennells, R., & Todd, E. (2006). Ecological influences of sexuality on early adolescent African American females. Journal of Community Health Nursing. In Press.
5. Aronowitz, T., Rennells, R., Todd, E., & Agbeshie, E. (2006). Attitudes that affect African American preadolescent girls and their mother's ability to talk openly about sex. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, Supplement: Adolescent Mental Health. In Press.
6. Carey, M. A. (1994). The group effect in focus groups: Planning, implementing, and interpreting focus group research. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods (pp. 234-241). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Carey, M. P., Braaten, L. S., Maisto, S. A., Gleason, J. R., Forsyth, A. D., Durant, L. E., et al. (2000). Using information, motivational enhancement, and skills training to reduce the risk of HIV infection for low-income urban women: A second randomized clinical trial. Health Psychology, 19, 3-11.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004, February 7). HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 2004. Retrieved January 23, 2006, from http://www.cdc.gov/ hiv/stats/harlink.htm
9. DiClemente, R. J., & Wingood, G. M. (1995). A randomized controlled trial of an HIV sexual risk-reduction intervention for young African American women. Journal of the American Medical Association, 274, 391-395.
10. Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1992). Changing AIDS-risk behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 455-474.
11. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA.: Sociology Press.
12. Khanlou, P. (2005). Participatory action research: Considerations for ethical review. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 2333-2341.
13. Kidd, P. S., & Parshall, M. B. (2000). Getting the focus and the group: Enhancing analytic rigor in focus group research. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 293-308.
14. Krueger, R. A. (1998). Moderating focus groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Ogbu, J. U. (1993). Differences in cultural frame of reference. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 16, 483-506.
17. UNAIDS. (2005). Access to HIV Prevention: Closing the gap. In Report on the global HIV/AIDS epidemic 2004. Retrieved January 23, 2006, from http://www.unaids.org
18. UNICEF. (2005). How does HIV/AIDS affect girls and women? [Electronic version]. New York: Author.
19. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.