With a careful look: Still no low-level confound to face pop-out

Vision Research

Volumn 46, Issue 18, 2006, Pages 3028-3035

  Hershler, Orit ^a   Hochstein, Shaul ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Detection; Face; Face inversion; Fourier amplitude; Fourier phase; Pop out; Search; Visual

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FACE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION;

DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FACE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 33745251623     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.023     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ahissar M., and Hochstein S. Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning. Nature 387 6631 (1997) 401-406
2. Ahissar M., and Hochstein S. The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends in Cognitive Science 8 10 (2004) 457-464
3. Avidan G., Hasson U., Malach R., and Behrmann M. Detailed exploration of face-related processing in congenital prosopagnosia: 2. Functional neuroimaging findings. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17 7 (2005) 1150-1167
4. Bentin S., and Golland Y. Meaningful processing of meaningless stimuli: The influence of perceptual experience on early visual processing of faces. Cognition 86 1 (2002) B1-B14
5. Brown V., Huey D., and Findlay J.M. Face detection in peripheral vision: Do faces pop out?. Perception 26 12 (1997) 1555-1570
6. Carbon C.C., and Leder H. When feature information comes first! Early processing of inverted faces. Perception 34 9 (2005) 1117-1134
7. Epstein, R. A., Higgins, J. S., Parker, W., Aguirre, G. K., & Cooperman, S. (2005). Cortical correlates of face and scene inversion: A comparison. Neuropsychologia, in press.
8. Ge L., Wang Z., McCleery J.P., and Lee K. Activation of face expertise and the inversion effect. Psychological Science 17 1 (2006) 12-16
9. Hansen C.H., and Hansen R.D. Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 6 (1988) 917-924
10. Hershler O., and Hochstein S. At first sight: A high-level pop out effect for faces. Vision Research 45 (2005) 1707-1724
11. Hochstein S., and Ahissar M. View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 36 5 (2002) 791-804
12. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., and Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience 17 (1997) 4302-4311
13. Kuehn S.M., and Jolicoeur P. Impact of quality of the image, orientation, and similarity of the stimuli on visual search for faces. Perception 23 1 (1994) 95-122
14. Morrone M.C., and Burr D.C. Feature detection in human vision: A phase dependent energy model. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 235 (1988) 221-245
15. Nothdurft H.C. Faces and facial expressions do not pop out. Perception 22 11 (1993) 1287-1298
16. Oppenheim A.V., and Lim J.S. The importance of phase in signals. Proceedings of the IEEE 69 (1981) 529-541
17. Perrett D.I., Rolls E.T., and Caan W. Visual neurons responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Experimental Brain Research 47 3 (1982) 329-342
18. Piotrowski L., and Campbell F.W. A demonstration of the visual importance and flexibility of spatial frequency amplitude and phase. Perception 11 (1982) 337-346
19. Popple A.V., Petrov Y., and Levi D.M. Two sources of error in pop-out localization. Vision Research 46 (2005) 293-298
20. Purcell D.G., Stewart A.L., and Skov R.B. It takes a confounded face to pop out of a crowd. Perception 25 9 (1996) 1091-1108
21. Tong F., and Nakayama K. Robust representations for faces: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 4 (1999) 1016-1035
22. Treisman A.M., and Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12 1 (1980) 97-136
23. Ullman S. Sequence seeking and counter streams: A computational model for bidirectional information flow in the visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex 5 1 (1995) 1-11
24. Ullman S., Vidal-Naquet M., and Sali E. Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification. Nature Neuroscience 5 7 (2002) 682-687
25. Valentine T. Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 79 (1988) 471-491
26. VanRullen, R. (2006). On second glance: Still no high-level pop-out effect for faces. Vision Research, in press, doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.009.
27. Wild H.A., and Busey T.A. Seeing faces in the noise: Stochastic activity in perceptual regions of the brain may influence the perception of ambiguous stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11 3 (2004) 475-481
28. Wolfe J.M. Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search. Trends in Cognitive Science 7 2 (2003) 70-76
29. Wolfe J.M., Horowitz T.S., Kenner N., Hyle M., and Vasan N. How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research 44 12 (2004) 1411-1426
30. Yin R. Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1969) 141-145
31. Yovel G., and Kanwisher N. Face perception: Domain specific, not process specific. Neuron 44 5 (2004) 889-898