Perspective: Maternal kin groups and the origins of asymmetric genetic systems - Genomic imprinting, haplodiploidy, and parthenogenesis

Evolution

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 631-642

  Normark, Benjamin B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Eusociality; Evolution of sex; Genetic conflict; Genomic imprinting; Haplodiploidy; Kin selection; Sexual conflict

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENOME; GENOMICS; HERITABILITY; IMPRINTING; KINSHIP; MATERNAL CARE; PARTHENOGENESIS; SIBLING;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DIPLOIDY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; GENOME IMPRINTING; HUMAN; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PARTHENOGENESIS;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; DIPLOIDY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENOME; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; PARTHENOGENESIS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 33745250120     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/05-546.1     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Alleman, M., and J. Doctor. 2000. Genomic imprinting in plants: observations and evolutionary implications. Plant Mol. Biol. 43:147-161.
2. Autran, D., W. Huanca-Mamani, and J.-P. Vielle-Calzada. 2005. Genomic imprinting in plants: the epigenetic version of an Oedipus complex. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8:19-25.
3. Bean, C. J., C. E. Schaner, and W. G. Kelly. 2004. Meiotic pairing and imprinted X chromatin assembly in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Genet. 36:100-105.
4. Beaudet, A. L., and Y. H. Jiang. 2002. A rheostat model for a rapid and reversible form of imprinting-dependent evolution. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70:1389-1397.
5. Beaver, R. A. 1974. Intraspecific competition among bark beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J. Anim. Ecol. 43:455-467.
6. Bell, G. 1982. The masterpiece of nature. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.
7. Bongiorni, S., C. Orietta, and G. Prantera. 1999. The relationship between DNA methylation and chromosome imprinting in the coccid Planococcus citri. Genetics 151:1471-1478.
8. Braig, H. R., B. Turner, B. B. Normark, and R. Stouthamer. 2002. Microorganism-induced parthenogenesis. Pp. 1-62 in R. N. Hughes, ed. Progress in asexual reproduction. Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
9. Brown, S. W. 1963. The Comstockiella system of chromosome behavior in the armored scale insects (Coccoidea: Diaspididae). Chromosoma 14:360-406.
10. _. 1964. Automatic frequency response in the evolution of male haploidy and other coccid chromosome systems. Genetics 49:797-817.
11. Brun, L. O., P. Borsa, V. Gaudichon, J. J. Stuart, K. Aronstein, C. Coustau, and R. H. ffrench-Constant. 1995. Functional haplodiploidy. Nature 374:506.
12. Buchner, P. 1965. Endosymbiosis of animals with plant-like microorganisms. Wiley Interscience, New York.
13. Bull, J. J. 1979. An advantage for the evolution of male haploidy and systems with similar genetic transmission. Heredity 43:361-381.
14. _. 1983. Evolution of sex determining mechanisms. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.
15. Burt, A., and R. Trivers. 2006. Genes in conflict: the biology of selfish genetic elements. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Croteau, S., M. F. Andrade, F. Huang, C. M. T. Greenwood, K. Morgan, and A. K. Naumova. 2002. Inheritance patterns of maternal alleles in imprinted regions of the mouse genome at different stages of development. Mammal. Genome 13:24-29.
17. Cuellar, O. 1994. Biogeography of parthenogenetic animals. CR Seances Soc. Biogeogr. 70:1-13.
18. Dindot, S. V., K. C. Kent, B. Evers, N. Loskutoff, J. Womack, and J. A. Piedrahita. 2004. Conservation of genomic imprinting at the XIST, IGF2, and GTL2 loci in the bovine. Mammal. Genome 15:966-974.
19. Engelstädter, J., and G. D. D. Hurst. 2006. Can maternally transmitted endosymbionts facilitate the evolution of haplodiploidy? J. Evol. Biol. 19:194-202.
20. Farrell, B. D., A. S. Sequeira, B. O'Meara, B. B. Normark, J. H. Chung, and B. H. Jordal. 2001. The evolution of agriculture in beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae). Evolution 55:2011-2027.
21. Ferguson-Smith, A. C., and M. A. Surani. 2001. Imprinting and the epigenetic asymmetry between parental genomes. Science 293:1086-1089.
22. Glesener, R. R., and D. Tilman. 1978. Sexuality and the components of environmental uncertainty: clues from geographic parthenogenesis in terrestrial animals. Am. Nat. 112:659-673.
23. Goldstein, D. B. 1994. Deleterious mutations and the evolution of male haploidy. Am. Nat. 144:176-183.
24. Haig, D. 1992. Genomic imprinting and the theory of parent-offspring conflict. Sem. Dev. Biol. 3:153-160.
25. _. 1993b. The evolution of unusual chromosomal systems in coccoids: extraordinary sex ratios revisited. J. Evol. Biol. 6:69-77.
26. _. 1993a. The evolution of unusual chromosomal systems in sciarid flies: intragenomic conflict and the sex ratio. J. Evol. Biol. 6:249-261.
27. _. 1997. Parental antagonism, relatedness asymmetries, and genomic imprinting. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264:1657-1662.
28. _. 2000. The kinship theory of genomic imprinting. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31:9-32.
29. _. 2002. Genomic imprinting and kinship. Rutgers Univ. Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
30. _. 2004. Genomic imprinting and kinship: How good is the evidence? Annu. Rev. Genet. 38:553-585.
31. Haig, D., and M. Westoby. 1991. Genomic imprinting in endosperm: its effect on seed development in crosses between species, and between different ploidies of the same species, and its implications for the evolution of apomixis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 333:1-13.
32. Haig, D., and J. F. Wilkins. 2000. Genomic imprinting, sibling solidarity and the logic of collective action. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 355:1593-1597.
33. Halmai, Z. 1994. The phenomenon "cannibalism" in Dermatophagoides farinae (Acari) populations. Parasitol. Hungar. 27:69-72.
34. Hamilton, W. D. 1964a. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J. Theor. Biol. 7:1-16.
35. _. 1964b. The genetical evolution of social behaviour, II. J. Theor. Biol. 7:17-52.
36. _. 1967. Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477-488.
37. _. 1978. Evolution and diversity under bark. Pp. 154-175 in L. A. Mound and N. Waloff, eds. Diversity of insect faunas. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, U.K.
38. _. 1993. Inbreeding in Egypt and in this book: a childish perspective. Pp. 429-450 in N. W. Thornhill, ed. The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
39. _. 2001. Narrow roads of gene land. Vol. 2. The evolution of sex. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
40. Hartl, D. L., and S. W. Brown. 1970. The origin of male haploid genetic systems and their expected sex ratio. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1:165-190.
41. Herrick, G., and J. Seger. 1999. Imprinting and paternal genome elimination in insects. Pp. 41-71 in R. Ohlsson, ed. Genomic imprinting: an interdisciplinary approach. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
42. Huigens, M. E., R. F. Luck, R. H. G. Klaassen, M. F. P. M. Maas, M. J. T. N. Timmermans, and R. Stouthamer. 2000. Infectious parthenogenesis. Nature 405:178-179.
43. Hurst, L. D. 1991. The incidences and evolution of cytoplasmic male-killers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 244:91-99.
44. Hurst, L. D., and W. D. Hamilton. 1992. Cytoplasmic fusion and the nature of sexes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 247:189-194.
45. Hurst, L. D., W. D. Hamilton, and R. J. Ladle. 1992. Covert sex. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7:144-145.
46. Isles, A. R., and A. J. Holland. 2005. Imprinted genes and mother-offspring interactions. Early Hum. Dev. 81:73-77.
47. Kirkendall, L. R. 1990. Sperm is a limiting resource in the pseudogamous bark beetle Ips acuminatus (Scolytidae). Oikos 57:80-87.
48. _. 1993. Ecology and evolution of biased sex ratios in bark and ambrosia beetles. Pp. 235-345 in D. L. Wrensch and M. A. Ebbert, eds. Evolution and diversity of sex ratio in insects and mites. Chapman and Hall, New York.
49. Kirkendall, L. R., D. S. Kent, and K. F. Raffa. 1997. Interactions among males, females and offspring in bark and ambrosia beetles: the significance of living in tunnels for the evolution of social behavior. Pp. 181-215 in J. C. Choe and B. J. Crespi, eds. The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
50. Kirkendall, L. R., and N. C. Stenseth. 1990. Ecological and evolutionary stability of sperm-dependent parthenogenesis: effects of partial niche overlap between sexual and asexual females. Evolution 44:698-714.
51. Kondrashov, A. S. 1997. Evolutionary genetics of life cycles. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:391-435.
52. Kono, T., Y. Obata, Q. L. Wu, K. Niwa, Y. Ono, Y. Yamamoto, E. S. Park, J. S. Seo, and H. Ogawa. 2004. Birth of parthenogenetic mice that can develop to adulthood. Nature 428:860-864.
53. Koteja, J. 1990. Embryonic development, oviparity and viviparity. Pp. 233-242 in D. Rosen, ed. Armored scale insects: their biology, natural enemies, and control, volume A. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
54. Leigh, E. G., Jr. 1971. Adaptation and diversity. Freeman, Cooper, San Francisco, CA.
55. Lema, K. M. 2004. Management of African root and tuber scale using improved cassava genotypes and mineral fertilizers. African Crop Sci. J. 12:217-222.
56. Lively, C. M., and S. G. Johnson. 1994. Brooding and the evolution of parthenogenesis: strategy models and evidence from aquatic invertebrates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 256:89-95.
57. Lloyd, V. 2000. Parental imprinting in Drosophila. Genetica 109:35-44.
58. Løyning, M. K. 2000. Reproductive performance of clonal and sexual bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in the field. J. Evol. Biol. 13:743-748.
59. Matsumoto, T., T. Itioka, and T. Nishida. 2002. Fitness cost of parasitoid avoidance behavior in the arrowhead scale. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 105:83-88.
60. McGowan, R. A., and C. C. Martin. 1997. DNA methylation and genome imprinting in the zebrafish, Danio rerio: some evolutionary ramifications. Biochem. Cell Biol. 75:499-506.
61. Mills, W., and T. Moore. 2004. Polyandry, life-history trade-offs and the evolution of imprinting at Mendelian loci. Genetics 168:2317-2327.
62. Mockford, E. L. 1971. Parthenogenesis in psocids (Insecta: Psocoptera). Am. Zool. 11:327-339.
63. Moore, T., and D. Haig. 1991. Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war. Trends Genet. 7:45-49.
64. Morrill, W. L., J. W. Gabor, D. K. Weaver, G. D. Kushnak, and N. J. Irish. 2000. Effect of host plant quality on the sex ratio and fitness of female wheat stem sawflies (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). Environ. Entomol. 29:195-199.
65. Naumova, A. K., C. M. T. Greenwood, and K. Morgan. 2001. Imprinting and deviation from Mendelian transmission ratios. Genome 44:311-320.
66. Ngeve, J. M. 2003. The cassava root mealybug (Stictococcus vayssierei Richard) (Homoptera: Stictococcidae): a threat to cassava production and utilization in Cameroon. Int. J. Pest Manag. 49:327-333.
67. Nicholls, R. D. 2000. The impact of genomic imprinting for neurobehavioral and developmental disorders. J. Clin. Investig. 4:413-418.
68. Normark, B. B. 2003. The evolution of alternative genetic systems in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 48:397-423.
69. _. 2004. Haplodiploidy as an outcome of coevolution between male-killing cytoplasmic elements and their hosts. Evolution 58:790-798.
70. Normark, B. B., B. H. Jordal, and B. D. Farrell. 1999. Origin of a haplodiploid beetle lineage. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266:2253-2259.
71. Norris, D. M., and H. M. Chu. 1985. Xyleborus ferrugineus. Pp. 303-315 in P. Singh and R. Moore, eds. Handbook of insect rearing. Vol. I. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
72. Norton, R. A., J. B. Kethley, D. E. Johnston, and B. M. O'Connor. 1993. Phylogenetic perspectives on genetic systems and reproductive modes of mites. Pp. 8-99 in D. L. Wrensch and M. A. Ebbert, eds. Evolution and diversity of sex ratio in insects and mites. Chapman and Hall, New York.
73. Otto, S. P., and P. Jarne. 2001. Haploids: hapless or happening? Science 292:2441-2443.
74. Pollock, D. A., and B. B. Normark. 2002. The life cycle of Micromalthus debilis LeConte (Coleoptera: Archostemmata: Micromalthidae): historical review and evolutionary perspective. J. Syst. Evol. Res. 40:105-112.
75. Queller, D. 2003. Theory of genomic imprinting conflict in social insects. BMC Evol. Biol. 3:15.
76. Randerson, J. P., and L. D. Hurst. 1999. Small sperm, uniparental inheritance and selfish cytoplasmic elements: a comparison of two models. J. Evol. Biol. 12:1110-1124.
77. Randerson, J. P., and L. D. Hurst. 2001. The uncertain evolution of the sexes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:571-579.
78. Reik, W., and J. Walter. 2001. Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2:21-32.
79. Reik, W., A. Collick, M. L. Norris, S. C. Barton, and M. A. Surani. 1987. Genomic imprinting determines methylation of parental alleles in transgenic mice. Nature 328:248-251.
80. Richard, C. 1976. Révision du groupe des Stictococcus et création de taxa nouveaux (Homoptera, Coccoidea). Ann. Soc. Entomol. France 12:653-669.
81. Richerd, S., V. Perrot, D. Couvet, M. Valero, and A. S. Kondrashov. 1994. Deleterious mutations can account for the maintenance of the haplo-diploid cycle. Pp. 359-367 in A. R. Beaumont, ed. Genetics and evolution of aquatic organisms. Chapman and Hall, London.
82. Saito, Y. 1990. Harem and non-harem type mating systems in two species of subsocial spider mites (Acari, Tetranychidae). Res. Popul. Ecol. 32:263-278.
83. Schausberger, P., and B. A. Croft. 2000. Nutritional benefits of intraguild predation and cannibalism among generalist and specialist phytoseiid mites. Ecol. Entomol. 25:473-480.
84. Schenk, J. A., and D. M. Benjamin. 1969. Notes on the biology of Ips pini in central Wisconsin jack pine forests. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 62:480-485.
85. Seger, J., and J. W. Stubblefield. 2002. Models of sex ratio evolution. Pp. 218-234 in I. C. W. Hardy, ed. Sex ratios: concepts and research methods. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
86. Sequeira, A. S., B. B. Normark, and B. D. Farrell. 2000. Evolutionary assembly of the conifer fauna: distinguishing ancient from recent associations in bark beetles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:2359-2366.
87. Sherratt, T. N., S. E. Ruff, and S. C. Church. 1999. No evidence for kin discrimination in cannibalistic tree-hole mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Insect Behav. 12:123-132.
88. Smith, N. G. C. 2000. The evolution of haplodiploidy under in-breeding. Heredity 84:186-192.
89. Srinivasan, R., and K. N. Panicker. 1992. Cannibalism among immatures of Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae). J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 89:386-387.
90. Stearns, S. C. 1987. The selection-arena hypothesis. Pp. 299-311 in S. C. Stearns, ed. The evolution of sex and its consequences. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel.
91. Stevens, L., R. Giordano, and R. F. Fialho. 2001. Male-killing, nematode infections, bacteriophage infection, and virulence of cytoplasmic bacteria in the genus Wolbachia. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32:519-545.
92. Suomalainen, E., A. Saura, and J. Lokki. 1987. Cytology and evolution in parthenogenesis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
93. Triplehorn, C. A., and N. F. Johnson. 2004. Borror and Delong's introduction to the study of insects. 7th ed. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Independence, KY.
94. Varmuza, S., and M. Mann. 1994. Genomic imprinting: defusing the ovarian time bomb. Trends Genet. 10:118-123.
95. Weber, B. C., and J. E. McPherson. 1983. Life history of the ambrosia beetle Xylosandrus germanus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 76:455-462.
96. White, M. J. D. 1973. Animal cytology and evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
97. Wilkins, J. F., and D. Haig. 2003. What good is genomic imprinting: the function of parent-specific gene expression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4:1-10.
98. Williams, G. C. 1975. The evolution of sex. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
99. Wilson, E. O. 2005. Kin selection as the key to altruism: its rise and fall. Soc. Res. 72:159-166.
100. Wood, S. L. 1982. The bark and ambrosia beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a taxonomic monograph. Great Basin Nat. Mem. 6:1-1359.