Promoting rehabilitation of safe driving abilities through computer-based clinical and personal screening techniques

Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 129-138

  Staplin, Loren ^a   Dinh Zarr, T Bella ^b  

^a TransAnalytics LLC   (United States)

^b AAA   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional abilities; Older driver; Prevention; Rehabilitation; Screening

Indexed keywords

AGING; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DRIVING ABILITY; EMPIRICISM; GERIATRIC REHABILITATION; HUMAN; REVIEW; SCREENING;

EID: 33745248404     PISSN: 08827524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00013614-200604000-00005     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Burg A. Vision and driving: a summary of research findings. Highway Res Rec. 1968;216:1-12.
2. Janke M, Eberhard J. Assessing medically impaired older drivers in a licensing agency setting. Accid Anal Prev. 1998;30(3):347-361.
3. Owsley C, Stalvey B, Wells J, Sloane ME, McGwin G Jr. Visual risk factors for crash involvement in older drivers with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:881-887.
4. Staplin L, Gish K, Wagner E. MaryPODS revisited: updated crash analysis and implications for screening program implementation. JSaf Res. 2003;34(4):389-397.
5. Staplin L, Lococo K, Gish K, Decina L. Model Driver Screening and Evaluation Program Final Technical Report, Volume 2: Maryland Pilot Older Driver Study. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2003. Report No. DOT HS 809 583.
6. Staplin L, Lococo K. Model Driver Screening and Evaluation Program: Guidelines for Motor Vehicle Administrators. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2003. Report No. DOT HS 809 581.
7. Ball K, Owsley C. The useful field of view test: a new technique for evaluating age-related declines in visual function. J Am Optom Assoc. 1993;64:71-79.
8. Lewis D. Computers in patient education. Comput Inform Nurs. 2003;21(2):88-96.