Biocompatibility of supercritical CO2 -treated titanium implants in a rat model

International Journal of Artificial Organs

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 430-433

  Hill, C M ^a   Kang, Q K ^a   Wahl, C ^b   Jimenez, A ^b   Laberge, M ^c   Drews, M ^c   Matthews, M A ^b   An, Yuehei H ^a  

^a Medical University of South Carolina   (United States)

^b The Department of Mechanical Engineering   (United States)

^c Clemson University   (United States)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Implant; Rats; Sterilization; Supercritical phase carbon dioxide; Titanium

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CARBON DIOXIDE; ETHYLENE; GLOW DISCHARGES; RATS; STERILIZATION (CLEANING); SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTION; TISSUE;

IMPLANT; IMPLANTABLE DEVICES; IMPLANTATION MODELS; RAT MODEL; SOFT TISSUE; SUPERCRITICAL CO 2; SUPERCRITICAL PHASE CARBON DIOXIDE; SUPERCRITICAL PHASIS; TISSUE GRAFTS; TITANIUM IMPLANTS;

TITANIUM;

CARBON DIOXIDE; ETHYLENE OXIDE; TITANIUM; ALLOY; BIOMATERIAL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUTOCLAVE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CAPILLARY DENSITY; FOREIGN BODY; IMPLANT; INSTRUMENT STERILIZATION; NONHUMAN; RADIOFREQUENCY; RAT; THICKNESS; TISSUE GRAFT; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ALLOYS; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CARBON DIOXIDE; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, ANIMAL; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; STERILIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 33745238743     PISSN: 03913988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/039139880602900413     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Lausmaa J, Kasemo B, Hansson S. Accelerated oxide growth on titanium implants during autoclaving caused by fluorine contamination. Biomaterials 1985; 6: 23-7.
2. Budd TW, Bielat KL, Meenaghan MA, Schaaf NG. Microscopic observations of the bone/implant interface of surface-treated titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6: 253-8.
3. Nair PD. Currently practised sterilization methods - some inadvertent consequences. J Biomater Appl 1995; 10: 121-35.
4. Zhang YZ, Bjursten LM, Freij-Larsson C, Kober M, Wesslen B. Tissue response to commercial silicone and polyurethane elastomers after different sterilization procedures. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 2265-72.
5. McNulty DE, Liao YS, Haas BD. The influence of sterilization method on wear performance of the low contact stress total knee system. Orthopedics 2002; 25 (suppl 2): S243-6.
6. Dillow AK, Dehghani F, Hrkach JS, Foster NR, Langer R. Bacterial inactivation by using near- and supercritical carbon dioxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 10344-8.
7. Fages J, Poirier B, Barbier Y, Frayssinet P, Joffret ML, Majewski W, Bonel G, Larzul D. Viral inactivation of human bone tissue using supercritical fluid extraction. ASAIO J 1998; 44: 289-93.
8. 2 on total microbial populations and bacterial spores in raw milk. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89: 872-81.
9. 2 implanted in sheep bones. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 2247-53.
10. Zhang J, Burrows S, Gleason C, Matthews MA, Drews MJ, LaBerge M, An YH. Sterilizing Bacillus pumilus spores using supercritical carbon dioxide. J Microbiol Methods 2006; [Epub ahead of print].
11. Ward WK, Slobodzian EP, Tiekotter KL, Wood MD. The effect of microgeometry, implant thickness and polyurethane chemistry on the foreign body response to subcutaneous implants. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 4185-92.