Using portfolios for external assessment: An experiment in Portugal

International Journal of Art and Design Education

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 209-218

  Torres Pereira de Eca, Maria Teresa ^a  

^a APECV ^*  (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745238362     PISSN: 14768062     EISSN: 14768070     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-8070.2005.00441.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Eça, T. (2004) Developing a New Conceptual Framework for Pre-University Art Examinations in Portugal. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Surrey, Roehampton.
2. Swift, J. & Steers, J. (1999) A Manifesto for Art in Schools, Journal of Art & Design Education, Vol 18, No. 1, pp. 7-13.
3. Ross, M. et al (1993) Assessing Achievement in the Arts. Buckingam: Open University Press, p. 51.
4. Lindström, L. (1999) The Multiple Uses of Portfolio Assessment, in Piironen, L. [Ed.] Portfolio Assessment in Secondary Art Education and Final Examination. Helsinki: University of Art and Design.
5. All the materials used in the experience and results are displayed online in Portuguese at www.geocities.com/aiea2000/guiao.htm (Accessed December 2004).
6. Freedman, K. (2003) Teaching Visual Culture: Curriculum, Aesthetics and the Social Life of Art. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, p. 11.
7. Wolf, D. et al (1991) To Use Their Minds Well: Investigating New Forms of Assessment, in Grant, G. [Ed.] Review of Research in Education. Washington, DC: American Research Association, p. 183.
8. Wiggins, G. P. (1993) Assessing Student Performance: Exploring the Purpose and Limits of Testing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Education Series, p. 195.
9. See, for example, Klenowski, V. (2003) Developing Portfolios For Learning And Assessment. London: RoutledgeFalmer; Schönau, D. W. (1996) Nationwide Assessment of Studio Work in the Visual Arts: Actual Practice and Research in the Netherlands, in Boughton, D. et al [Eds.] Evaluating and Assessing the Visual Arts in Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Boughton, D. (1997) Reconsidering Issues of Assessment and Achievement Standards in Art Education, Studies in Art Education, Vol 38, No. 4, pp. 199-213.
11. See Beattie, D. K. (1997) Visual Arts Criteria, Objectives, and Standards: A Revisit, Studies in Art Education, Vol 38, No. 4, pp. 217-31; Blaikie, F. (1996) Qualitative Assessment of Studio Art: Problems, Definitions and Solutions, Canadian Review of Art Education, Vol 23, No. 1, pp. 17 -30 ; (Finland) Department of Art Education (1999), Report of EU Comenius 3.1 Project, pp. 7 -16 ; Boughton, D. op. cit ; Steers, J. (2003) Art and Design, in White, J. [Ed.] Rethinking The School Curriculum: Values, Aims and Purposes. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
12. Klenowski, V. op. cit.
13. Black, et al (2003), p. 59.
14. Ross, M. et al op. cit.
15. Rayment, T. (1999) Assessing National Curriculum Art AT2, Knowledge and Understanding: A Small-Scale Project at Key-Stage 3, Journal of Art & Design Education, Vol 18, No. 2, pp. 188-193.