Limits to database protection: Fair use and scientific research exemptions

Research Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 854-874

  Sanders, Anselm Kamperman ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Copyright; Economics of information goods; Intellectual property rights; Open science; Sui generis protection of databases

Indexed keywords

COPYRIGHTS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

ECONOMICS OF INFORMATION GOODS; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR); OPEN SCIENCE; PUBLIC SECTOR INFORMATION; SUI GENERIS PROTECTION OF DATABASES;

SECURITY OF DATA;

EID: 33745235761     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Adams J. Intellectual Property Quarterly 1 (2002) 1
2. Akerlof G.A. The market for 'Lemons'. Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics (1970) 488
3. Arrow K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Economic Activity Economic and Social Factors (1962), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
4. Band, J., 2005. The Database Debate in the 108th US Congress: The Saga Continues. European Intellectual Property Review 6, 205-212.
5. Barendt E. The first amendment and the media. In: Loveland I. (Ed). Importing the First Amendment-Freedom of Speech and Expression in Britain, Europe and the USA (1998), Hart Publishing, Oxford 29-50
6. Barlow, J., 1994. The Economy of Ideas. Wired 2.03 (March), 85.
7. Beater A. Nachahmen im Wettbewerb (1995), Mohr, Tübingen
8. Benkler Y. Constitutional bounds of database protection: the role of judicial review in the creation and definition of private rights in information. Berkeley Law and Technology Journal 15 (2000) 535
9. Berger M. Die funktionale Konkretisierung von Art. 2 UWG (1997), Schulthess, Zürich
10. Besen S.M., and Raskind L.J. An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Intellectual Property. Journal of Economic Perspectives (1991) 3
11. Calabresi G., and Melamed A.D. Property rules, liability rules, and inalienability: one view of the cathedral. Harvard Law Review 85 (1972) 1089
12. Callmann R. He who Reaps where He has not Sown: Unjust Enrichment in the Law of Unfair Competition. Harvard Law Review 55 (1942) 595
13. Calvet H., and Desurmont T. The magill ruling (1): an isolated decision?. Revue Internationale du Droit d'Auteur 167 (1996) 2
14. Coase R.H. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3 (1960) 1
15. Conley J., Brown M., and Bryan R. Database protection in a digital world: why the United States should decline to follow the European model. Information and Communications Technology Law (2000) 27
16. Cook, T., 1996. The final version of the EC database directive: a model for the rest of the world? Copyright World 61, 24.
17. Cornish W.R., and Phillips J. The economic function of trademarks: an analysis with special reference to developing countries. International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law 13 (1982) 41
18. Dam, K.W., 1998. Intellectual Property and the Academic Enterprise, John M. Olin, Law & Economics Working Paper No. 68 (2nd Series). The Law School, The University of Chicago.
19. De Scitovszky T. A note on welfare propositions in economics. Review of Economic Studies (1941) 77
20. Demsetz H. Barriers to entry. American Economic Review 72 (1982) 47
21. Denicola R.C. Copyright in collections of facts: a theory for the protection of nonfiction literary works. Columbia Law Review 81 (1981) 516
22. Diamond S.A. The public interest and the trademark system. JPOS 62 (1980) 528
23. Drahos P. Intellectual property and human rights. Intellectual Property Quarterly 3 (1999) 349-371
24. Economides N.S. The Economics of Trademarks. Trade Mark Reporter 78 (1988) 523
25. European Commission Working Paper, 2001. Managing IPR in a knowledge-based economy-bioinformatics and the influence of public policy. Brussels, EUR 20066.
26. Foerstel H.N. Free Expression and Censorship in America-An Encyclopedia (1997), Greenwood Press, Westport/London
27. Friedman D.D., Landes W.M., and Posner R.A. Some economics of trade secret law. Journal of Economic Perspectives (1991) 61
28. Gaster, J., 1999. Der Rechtsschutz von Databanken: Kommentar zur Richtlinie 96/9/EG, mit Erläuterungen zur Umsetzung in das Deutsche und Osterreichische Recht. Köln: Heymanns Verlag.
29. Ginsburg J. No "Sweat"? Copyright and Other Protection of Works of Information After Feist v. Rural Telephone. Columbia Law Review 92 (1992) 338
30. Gordon W. On owning information: intellectual property and the restitutionary impulse. Virginia Law Review 78 (1992) 149-281
31. Gordon W.J. Fair use as market failure: a structural and economic analysis of the betamax case and its predecessors. Columbia Law Review 82 (1982) 1600
32. Gordon W.J. Asymmetric market failure and prisoners dilemma in intellectual property. University of Dayton Law Review 17 (1992) 853
33. Green N. Intellectual property and the abuse of a dominant position under european union law: existence. exercise and the evaporation of rights. Brooklyn Journal of International Law (1993) 141
34. Haines S. Copyright takes the dominant position. European Intellectual Property Review 9 (1994) 401
35. Hardy T. The ancient doctrine of trespass to web sites. Journal of Online Law (1996) 7
36. Hayek F.A. Economics and Knowledge. Individualism and Economic Order (1948), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
37. Heald P. Federal intellectual property law and the economics of pre-emption. Iowa Law Review 76 (1991) 959
38. Hicks J.R. Foundations of welfare economics. Economic Journal 49 (1939) 696
39. Hugenholtz, P., 2001. The New Database Right: Early Case Law from Europe. Available at http://www.ivir.nl/publications/hugenholtz/fordham2001.pdf.
40. Kaldor N. Welfare propositions of economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Economic Journal 49 (1939) 549
41. Karjala D. Misappropriation as a third intellectual property paradigm. Columbia Law Review 94 (1994) 2594
42. Katz, M., Shapiro, C., 1998. Antitrust in Software Markets. Paper presented at the Progress and Freedom Foundation Conference. Competition, Convergence and the Microsoft Monopoly, February 5.
43. Kaufer E. The Economics of the Piatent System (1989), Harwood Academic Publishers GmbH, Chur
44. Kelly K. New Rules for the New Economy (1998), Viking Press, New York
45. Korah V. An Introductory Guide to EC Competition Law and Practice. 5th ed. (1994), Sweet & Maxwell, London
46. Korah V. The Interface between intellectual property and antitrust: the European experience. Antitrust Law Journal (2001) 801
47. Kübler P. Rechtsschutz von Databanken (EU-USA-Schweiz) (1999), Schulthess Verlag, Zürich
48. Laddie H. Copyright: over-strength, over-regulated, over-rated?. European Intellectual Property Review 5 (1996) 260
49. Landes W.M., and Posner R.A. Trademark law: an economic perspective. Journal of Law and Economics 30 (1987) 265
50. Landes W.M., and Posner R.A. The Economic Structure of Tort Law (1987), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
51. Landes W.M., and Posner R.A. An economic analysis of copyright law. Journal of Economic Studies 18 (1989) 325
52. Leigh L. Of free speech and individual reputation: New York Times v. Sullivan in Canada and Australia. In: Loveland I. (Ed). Importing the First Amendment-Freedom of Speech and Expression in Britain, Europe and the USA (1998), Hart Publishing, Oxford 51-68
53. Lloyd I. Information Technology Law. 2nd ed. (1997), Butterworths, London
54. In: Loveland I. (Ed). Importing the First Amendment-Freedom of Speech and Expression in Britain, Europe and the USA (1998), Hart Publishing, Oxford
55. Mackaay E. Legal hybrids: beyond property and monopoly?. Columbia Law Review 94 (1996) 2630
56. Mallet-Poujol N. The information market: copyright unjustly tormented. Revue Internationale du Droit d'Auteur 167 (1996) 92
57. Maurer S., Hugenholtz P., and Onsrud H. Europe's Database Experiment. Science 294 26 Oct. (2001) 789
58. Merges R.P. Of property rules, coase, and intellectual property. Columbia Law Review 94 (1994) 2655
59. Miller C. Magill: time to abandon the "specific subject-matter" concept. European Intellectual Property Review (1994) 415
60. Ohly, A., 1997. Richterrecht und Generalklausel im Recht des unlauteren Wettbewerbs: ein Methodenvergleich des Englischen und des Deutschen Rechts. Köln: Heymann.
61. Passa, J., 1997. Contrefaçon et Concurrence Déloyale. Paris: Litec.
62. Pollack M. The right to know? Delimiting database protection at the juncture of the commerce clause. the intellectual property clause and the first amendment. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 17 (1999) 47
63. Posner, R., 2000. Antitrust in the New Economy. Tech Law Journal 14 September. Available at http://www.techlawjournal.com/atr/20000914posner.asp.
64. Reichmann J. Legal hybrids between the patent and copyright paradigms. Columbia Law Review 94 (1994) 2432
65. Reichmann J., and Samuelson P. Intellectual property rights in data?. Vanderbilt Law Review 50 (1997) 51
66. Samuelson P., and Opsahl K. The tensions between intellectual property and contracts in the information age: an american perspective. In: Grosheide F., and Boele-Woelki K. (Eds). Molengrafica (1998), Vermande, Lelystad 163-193
67. Sanders A.K. Unfair Competition Law-The Protection of Intellectual and Industrial Creativity (1997), Clarendon Press, Oxford
68. Sanders A.K. Unfair competition law and the European court of human rights, The Case of Hertel v. Switzerland and Beyond. Fordham Intellectual Property Media and Entertainment Law Journal 10 (1999) 305
69. Sanders A.K. Essential facilities and appropriate remuneration of achievements. In: Heath C., and Sanders A.K. (Eds). New Frontiers of Intellectual Property Law-IP in Cultural Heritage, Geographical Indications, Enforcement and Overprotection (2005), Hart Publishing, Oxford 245-265
70. Shapiro C. Exclusivity in network industries. George Mason Law Review 7 (1999) 1
71. Stewart T., 1997. Intellectual Capital. Doubleday/Currency.
72. Sunstein C. The first amendment in cyberspace. Yale Law Journal 105 (1757)
73. Tritton G. Intellectual Property in Europe (1996), Sweet & Maxwell, London
74. Van Kerckhove, M., 1995. Magill: a refusal to license or a refusal to supply? Copyright World 51 (June/July), 26.
75. Varian H., and Shapiro C. Information Rules-A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (1999), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
76. Warren-Boulton, F., Baseman, K., Woroch G., 1994. The economics of intellectual property protection for software: the proper role for copyright. Paper prepared for the American Council on Interoperable Systems, June, Washington, D.C.