Introduction: Exploring the links between geomorphology and ecology

Geomorphology

Volumn 77, Issue 3-4, 2006, Pages 203-206

  Urban, Michael A ^a   Daniels, Melinda ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745223637     PISSN: 0169555X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.01.004     Document Type: Editorial

References (17)

1. Box J. Setting objectives and defining outputs for ecological restoration and habitat creation. Restoration Ecology 4 (1996) 427-432
2. deBoer D.H. Heirarchies and spatial scale in process geomorphology: a review. Geomorphology 4 (1992) 303-318
3. Dunning J.B., Danielson B.J., and Pulliam H.R. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65 (1992) 169-175
4. Fausch K.D., Torgersen C.E., Baxter C.V., and Li H.W. Landscapes to riverscapes: bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. BioScience 52 (2002) 483-498
5. Frothingham K.M., Rhoads B.L., and Herricks E.E. A multiscale conceptual framework for integrated ecogeomorphological research to support stream naturalization in the agricultural Midwest. Environmental Management 29 (2002) 16-33
6. Goldstein R.M., Wang L., Simon T.P., and Stewart P.M. Devlopment of a stream habitat index for the Northern Lakes and Forests Ecoregion. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22 (2002) 452-464
7. Kirkby M. The landscape viewed through models. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie. Supplement 79 (1990) 63-81
8. Kolb C.E. NRC says integrated approach needed to understand, protect environment. EOS 79 (1998) 62
9. Morrison M.L. A proposed research emphasis to overcome the limits of wildlife-habitat relationship studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 65 (2001) 613-623
10. National Research Council. Building a foundation for sound environmental decisions. Committee on research opportunities and priorities for EPA, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Water Science and Technology Board, Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources, National Research Council (1997), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
11. Peeters E.T.H.M., and Gardeniers J.J.P. Logistic regression as a tool for defining habitat requirements of two common gammarids. Freshwater Biology 39 (1998) 605-615
12. Rabeni C.F., and Jacobson R.B. The importance of fluvial hydraulics to fish-habitat restoration in low-gradient alluvial streams. Freshwater Biology 29 (1993) 211-220
13. Rhoads B.L., Schwartz J.S., and Porter S. Stream geomorphology, bank vegetation, and three-dimensional habitat hydraulics for fish in midwestern agricultural streams. Water Resources Research 39 (2003) 2-13
14. Richards C., Haro R.J., Johnson L.B., and Host G.E. Catchment and reach-scale properties as indicators of macroinvertebrate species traits. Freshwater Biology 37 (1997) 219-230
15. Rosgen D.L. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22 (1994) 169-199
16. Sherman D.J. Geomorphology: praxis and theory. In: Kenzer M.S. (Ed). Applied Geography: Issues, Questions, and Concerns (1989), Kluwer Academic, Boston 115-131
17. Taylor P.D., Fahrig L., Henein K., and Merriam G. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68 (1993) 571-573