Promotion of science ethics in the scientific periphery

Croatian Medical Journal

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 503-504

  Vučković Dekić, Ljiljana ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINUING EDUCATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; LETTER; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOTIVATION; SCIENCE;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; ETHICS, RESEARCH; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; YUGOSLAVIA;

EID: 33745218325     PISSN: 03539504     EISSN: 13328166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (17)

1. Lock S. Britain prefers talk to action. Which is why it has failed to tackle research misconduct. BMJ. 2003;327:940-1.
2. Kataví V. Five-year report of Croatian Medical Journal's research integrity Editor - policy, policing, or policing policy. Croat Med J. 2006;47:220-7.
3. Vučković-Dekić Lj, Milošević D, Borojević N. Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice. Ongoing developments in Serbia [on CD-ROM]. Total Quality Managements & Excellence. 2005;33:245-8.
4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Recommendations of the Commission on Professional Self-regulation in Science. Proposals for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice. January 1998. Available at: http://www.dfg.de. Accessed: May 28, 2006.
5. European Science Foundation Policy Briefing. Good scientific practice in research and scholarship. Available at: http://www.esf.org/sciencepolicy/170/ ESPB10.pdf. Accessed: May 17, 2006.
6. Brkić S, Vučković-Dekić Lj, Bogdanović G, editors. Publishing in biomedicine [in Serbian]. Novi Sad: Ortomedics; 2006.
7. Vučković-Dekić Lj. Good editorial practice. The procedure for retraction of the published article [in Serbian]. Acta Rheumatologica Belgradiensias. 2002;32:149-53.
8. Symposium on manuscript peer reviewing in biomedical journals. Archives of Oncology. 2002;10:83-103.
9. Vučković;-Dekić Lj. Milenković, editors. Ethics of research in biomedicine [in Serbian]. 2nd rev. ed. University of Belgrade School of Medicine: KAM-GRAF, 2004.
10. Belgrade University Medical Faculty. Good scientific practice [in Serbian]. Available at: http://www.med.bg.ac.yu/dloads/dnp_korigovan.pdf. Accessed: May 16, 2006.
11. Ministry of Sciences and Ecology of Republic of Serbia. Scientific Activity Act [in Serbian]. Available at: http://www.mntr.sr.gov.yu/uploads/ articles/nauka_zakon_nid.pdf. Accessed: May 17, 2006.
12. Schneider C. Safeguarding good scientific practice: new institutional approaches in Germany. Sci Eng Ethics. 2000;6:49-56.
13. Bilić-Zulle L, Frković V, Turk T, Ažman J, Petrovečki M. Prevalence of plagiarism among medical students. Croat Med J. 2005;46:126-31.
14. Hrabak M, Vujaklija A, Vodopivec I, Hren D, Marušić; M, Marušić A. Academic misconduct among medical students in a post-communist country. Med Educ. 2004;38:276-85.
15. Athanassiou AE. Read this; it could make you good. Journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology. 2003;8:5.
16. Vučković-Dekić Lj. Combating scientific fraud. Balkan Journal of Stomatology. 2004;8:87-8.
17. Vučković-Dekić Lj. Role of journals in addressing scientific misconduct. Croat Med J. 2004;45:104-6.