The potential impact of a low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco product on cigarette smoking in the United States: Estimates of a panel of experts

Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1190-1200

  Levy, David T ^a   Mumford, Elizabeth A ^a   Cummings, K Michael ^b   Gilpin, Elizabeth A ^c   Giovino, Gary A ^b   Hyland, Andrew ^b   Sweanor, David ^d   Warner, Kenneth E ^e   Compton, Christine ^a  

^a PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EVALUATION   (United States)

^b ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Harm reduction; Smokeless tobacco; Tobacco control

Indexed keywords

NITROSAMINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CIGARETTE SMOKING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; MALE; POLICY; PREVALENCE; RISK REDUCTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SMOKELESS TOBACCO; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONSENSUS; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MARKETING; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NITROSAMINES; PUBLIC HEALTH; SMOKING; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; TOBACCO, SMOKELESS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33745211212     PISSN: 03064603     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Burnette D., Morrow-Howell N., and Chen L.M. Setting priorities for gerontological social work research: A national Delphi study. Gerontologist 43 6 (2003) 828-838
2. Burns, D., Anderson, C., Johnson, M., et al. (2000). Cessation and cessation measures among daily adult smokers: National-and State-specific data. Population-based Smoking Cessation: A Conference on What Works to Influence Smoking in the General Population. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 12. N.C. Institute. Bethesda, MD, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health: 113-304.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette Smoking Among Adults-United States, 1992, and Changes in the Definition of Current Cigarette Smoking. MMWR 43 19 (1994) 342-346
4. Choi W.S., Pierce J.P., Gilpin E.A., Farkas A.J., and Berry C.C. Which adolescent experimenters progress to established smoking in the United States. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 13 5 (1997) 385-391
5. Crisp J., Pelletier D., Duffield C., Nagy S., and Adams A. It's all in a name. When is a 'Delphi study' not a Delphi study?. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 16 3 (1999) 32-37
6. Dalkey N., and Helmer O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science 9 (1963) 458-467
7. Dunn W. Public policy analysis (1981), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
8. Everett A. Piercing the veil of the future. A review of the Delphi method of research. Professional Nurse 9 3 (1993) 181-185
9. Foulds J., Ramstrom L., Burke M., and Fagerstrom K. Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden. Tobacco Control 12 4 (2003) 349-359
10. Gilpin E.A., and Pierce J.P. Patterns of cigar use in California in 1999. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 21 4 (2001) 325-328
11. Hahn E.J., and Rayens M.K. Consensus for tobacco policy among former state legislators using the policy Delphi method. Tobacco Control 8 2 (1999) 137-140
12. Hasson F., Keeney S., and McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing 32 4 (2000) 1008-1015
13. Kirigia J.M. Economic evaluation in schistosomiasis: Valuation of health states preferences. A research note. Health Economics 7 6 (1998) 551-556
14. Levy D.T., Mumford E., Cummings M., Gilpin B., Giovino G., Hyland A., et al. The relative risks of a low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco product compared to smoking cigarettes: Estimates of a panel of experts. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 13 12 (2004) 2035-2042
15. Levy D.T., Mumford E., and Nikolayev L. Recent trends in smoking and the role of public policies: Results from the SimSmoke tobacco control policy simulation model. Addiction 10 10 (2005) 1526-1537
16. National Cancer Institute (1998). Cigars: Health Effects and Trends. Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute.
17. Nelson D.E., Davis R.M., Chrismon J.H., and Giovino G.A. Pipe smoking in the United States, 1965-1991: Prevalence and attributable mortality. Preventive Medicine 25 2 (1996) 91-99
18. Powell C. The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing 41 4 (2003) 376-382
19. Rainhorn J.D., Brudon-Jakobowicz P., and Reich M.R. Priorities for pharmaceutical policies in developing countries: Results of a Delphi survey. Bull World Health Organ 72 2 (1994) 257-264
20. Shiffman S., Gitchell J.G., Warner K.E., Slade J., Henningfield J.E., and Pinney J.M. Tobacco harm reduction: Conceptual structure and nomenclature for analysis and research. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 4 Suppl 2 (2002) 113-129
21. Stratton, K., Shetty, P., Wallace, R., & Bondurant, S. (2001). Clearing the smoke: Assessing the science base for tobacco harm reduction. Washington, DC, Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press.
22. Sweanor D. Reducing toxicity exposure for the nicotine-dependent. Addiction 98 9 (2003) 1197-1198 (discussion 1204-7)
23. Tomar S.L., Connolly G.N., Wilkenfeld J., and Henningfield J.E. Declining smoking in Sweden: Is Swedish Match getting the credit for Swedish tobacco control's efforts?. Tobacco Control 12 4 (2003) 368-371
24. U.S. DHHS (1992). Smoking and health in the Americas: A Report of the Surgeon General, in collaboration with the Pan American Health Organization. Atlanta, GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.
25. U.S. DHHS (1994). Preventing tobacco use among young people: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.