Participation in curbside recycling schemes and its variation with material types

Waste Management

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 914-919

  Woodard, R ^a   Harder, M K ^a   Bench, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURBSIDE RECYCLING; HINDERING TRANSFERABILITY; SAMPLES;

PLASTICS; RECYCLING; WASTES;

WASTE UTILIZATION;

PLASTIC;

PLASTICS; RECYCLING; WASTE UTILIZATION; WASTES;

HOUSEHOLD SURVEY; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; LOCAL PLANNING; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PAVEMENT; RECYCLING;

ARTICLE; HOUSEHOLD; MATERIALS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RECYCLING; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALUMINUM; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DATA COLLECTION; ENGLAND; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NEWSPAPERS; PAPER; PERIODICALS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PLASTICS; REFUSE DISPOSAL;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33745210548     PISSN: 0956053X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Coggins C. Who is the recycler?. Journal of Waste Management and Resource Recovery 1 (1994) 69-75
2. Corral-Verdugo V. Dual 'realities' of conservation behaviour: self reports vs observations of re-use and recycling behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 17 (1997) 135-145
3. DeBurca, D., Dodd, V.A., 1996. Curbside recycling schemes as a municipal solid waste management option. In: Air & Waste Management Association, 89th Meeting and Exhibition, Nashville, TN.
4. DETR. Monitoring and evaluating recycling, composting and recovery programmes (1999), HMSO, London, UK
5. DETR. Waste Strategy 2000 (2000), HMSO, London, UK
6. Everett J.W., and Peirce J.J. Curbside recycling in the USA: convenience and mandatory recycling. Waste Management and Research 11 (1993) 49-61
7. Feiock R.C., and West J. Explaining success of local recycling programs: a reassessment. International Journal of Public Administration 19 7 (1996) 1065-1087
8. Folz D.H. Municipal recycling performance: a public sector environmental success story. Public Administration Review 59 (1999) 336-345
9. FoE, Friends of the Earth, 2001. Recycling in action. London, UK.
10. Harder, M.K., Woodard, R., Bench, M.L., 2006. Two measured parameters correlated to participation rates in curbside recycling schemes in the UK, Environmental Management.
11. Jones, S.R., Read, A.D., 2001. Green fingered - green minded: waste management and the organic waste stream. In: Proceedings of Towards the Future - Waste in the 21st Century, pp. 30-40.
12. Knussen C., Yule F., MacKenzie J., and Wells M. An analysis of intentions to recycle household waste: The roles of past behaviour, perceived habit, and lack of facilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24 (2004) 237-246
13. Lyas, J., Shaw, P., Van-Vugt, M., 2002. Survival bag behaviour in a London Borough: householder behaviour, motivations and barriers. In: IWM Proceeding 2002, Torbay, UK.
14. McDonald S., and Oates C. Reasons for non-participation in a kerbside recycling scheme. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 39 (2003) 369-385
15. Moloney D. Research into householder participation in recycling schemes. Warmer Bulletin July (2002) 16-19
16. Office of National Statistics. 2004. Census 2001. .
17. Oskamp S., Zelezny L., Schultz P.W., Hurin S., and Burkhardt R. Commingled versus separated curbside recycling - does sorting matter?. Environment and Behaviour 28 1 (1996) 73-91
18. Perrin D., and Barton J. Issues associated with transforming household attitudes and opinions into materials recycling: a review of two recycling schemes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 33 (2001) 61-74
19. Resource Recovery Forum. Household Waste Behaviour in London (2002), RRF, Skipton, UK
20. Thomas C. Public understanding and its effect on recycling performance in Hampshire and Milton Keynes. Resources Conservation and Recycling 32 (2001) 259
21. Tucker P. A survey of attitudes and barriers to kerbside recycling. Environmental and Waste Management 2 1 (1999) 55-63
22. Tucker P., and Speirs D. Relationships amongst waste management behaviours. CIWM Scientific and Technical Review 4 1 (2003) 2-8
23. Tucker P., and Speirs D. Count me as doing my bit: an appraisal of the accuracy of waste attitude/behaviour surveys. CIWM Scientific and Technical Review 4 2 (2003) 9-18
24. Tucker P., Murney G., and Lamont J. Participation in recycling: a comparative study of four kerbside recycling schemes. Journal of Waste Management and Resource Recovery 4 (1997) 11-23
25. Tucker P., Grayson J., and Speirs D. Integrated effects of a reduction in collection frequency for a kerbside newspaper recycling scheme. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 31 (2000) 149-170
26. Wang F.S., Richardson A.J., and Roddick F.A. Relationships between set-out rate, participation rate and set-out quantity in recycling programs. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 20 (1997) 1-17
27. Woodard R., Bench M., Harder M.K., and Philip M. Evaluating the performance of a fortnightly collection of household waste separated into compostables, recyclates and refuse in the south of England. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 31 (2001) 265-284
28. Woolam T.C., Emery A., Griffiths A.J., and Williams K.P. A comparison of intended and claimed recycling behaviour to actual in a new kerbside scheme. CIWM Scientific and Technical Review 4 3 (2003) 2-9