The Disciple-RKF learning and reasoning agent

Computational Intelligence

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 462-479

  Tecuci, Gheorghe ^a   Boicu, Mihai ^a   Boicu, Cristina ^a   Marcu, Dorin ^a   Stanescu, Bogdan ^a   Barbulescu, Marcel ^a  

^a Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study   (United States)

Author keywords

Military center of gravity analysis; Mixed initiative reasoning; Multistrategy apprenticeship learning; Ontology; Plausible version spaces; Rule learning; Task reduction

Indexed keywords

MILITARY CENTER OF GRAVITY ANALYSIS; MIXED-INITIATIVE REASONING; MULTISTRATEGY APPRENTICESHIP LEARNING; ONTOLOGY; TASK REDUCTION;

GRAVITATIONAL EFFECTS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; TEACHING;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33745201001     PISSN: 08247935     EISSN: 14678640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8640.2005.00282.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Boicu, C., G. TECUCI, M. BOICU, and D. MARCU. 2003. Improving the representation space through exception-based learning. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International FLAIRS Conference, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 336-340.
2. Boicu, M., G. TECUCI, D. MARCU, M. BOWMAN, P. SHYR, F. CIUCU, and C. LEVCOVICI. 2000. Disciple-COA: From agent programming to agent teaching. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann, Stanford, CA.
3. BOICU, M. 2002. Modeling and learning with incomplete knowledge. Ph.D. Dissertation. George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
4. Boicu, M., G. TECUCI, B. STANESCU, D. MARCU, M. BARBULESCU, and C. BOICU. 2004. Design principles for learning agents. In Proceedings of AAAI-2004 Workshop on Intelligent Agent Architectures, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA.
5. BOWMAN, M. 2002. A methodology for modeling expert knowledge that supports teaching based development of agents. Ph.D. Dissertation, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
6. CLAUSEWITZ, C. V. 1832. On War, translated and edited by M. Howard and P. Paret. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 1976.
7. DEJONG, G., and R. J. MOONEY. 1986. Explanation-based learning: An alternative view. Machine Learning, 1:145-176.
8. GILES, P. K., and T. P. GALVIN. 1996. Center of gravity: Determination, analysis and application. CSL, U.S. Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, PA.
9. MITCHELL, T. M. 1978. Version spaces: An approach to concept learning. Ph.D. Thesis. Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
10. MITCHELL, T. M., T. KELLER, and S. KEDAR-CABELLI. 1986. Explanation-based generalization: A unifying view. Machine Learning, 1:47-80.
11. NILSSON, N. J. 1971. Problem Solving Methods in Artificial Intelligence, McGraw-Hill, NY.
12. POWELL, G. M., and C. F. SCHMIDT. 1988. A First-order Computational Model of Human Operational Planning, CECOM-TR-01-8, US Army CECOM, Fort Monmouth, New Jersey.
13. STANESCU, B., C. BOICU, G. BALAN, M. BARBULESCU, M. BOICU, and G. TECUCI. 2003. Ontologies for learning agents: Problems, solutions and directions. In Proceedings of the IJCAI-03 Workshop on Workshop on Ontologies and Distributed Systems, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 75-82.
14. STRANGE, J. 1996. Centers of Gravity & Critical Vulnerabilities: Building on the Clausewitzian Foundation So That We Can All Speak the Same Language. Marine Corps University, Quantico, VA.
15. TECUCI, G. 1988. Disciple: A theory, methodology and system for learning expert knowledge. Thèse de Docteur en Science, University of Paris-South.
16. TECUCI, G. 1998. Building Intelligent Agents: An Apprenticeship Multistrategy Learning Theory, Methodology, Tool and Case Studies. Academic Press, London, UK.
17. TECUCI, G., M. BOICU, M. BOWMAN, and D. MARCU, with a commentary by M. BURKE. 2001. An Innovative Application from the DARPA Knowledge Bases Programs: Rapid Development of a High Performance Knowledge Base for Course of Action Critiquing. AI Magazine, 22, 2. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 43-61.
18. TECUCI, G., M. BOICU, D. MARCU, B. STANESCU, C. BOICU, and J. COMELLO. 2002. Training and using disciple agents: A case study in the military center of gravity analysis domain. AI Magazine, 23(4): 51-68.