Fine-needle aspiration cytology predicts inguinal lymph node metastasis without antibiotic pretreatment in penile carcinoma

BJU International

Volumn 97, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1225-1228

  Saisorn, Isares ^a,b   Lawrentschuk, Nathan ^a   Leewansangtong, Sunai ^b   Bolton, Damien M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b NARESUAN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Aspiration biopsies; Carcinoma penis; Cytology; Inguinal lymphadenopathy; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INGUINAL LYMPH NODE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPHADENOPATHY; MALE; PENILE BIOPSY; PENIS CARCINOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; HUMANS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PENILE NEOPLASMS; PENIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33745197120     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06159.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Solsona E, Algaba F, Horenblas S, Pizzocaro G, Windahl T European Association of Urology. EAU guidelines on penile cancer. Eur Urol 2004 46: 1 8
2. Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1999. CA Cancer J Clin 1999 49: 8 31
3. Pow-Sang MR, Benavente V, Pow-Sang JE et al. Cancer of the penis. Cancer Control 2002 9: 305 14
4. Pizzocaro G, Piva L, Bandieramonte G, Tana S. Up-to-date management of carcinoma of the penis. Eur Urol 1997 32: 5 15
5. Ornellas AA, Seixas AL, Marota A, Wisnescky A, Campos F, de Moraes JR. Surgical treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: retrospective analysis of 350 cases. J Urol 1994 151: 1244 9
6. Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Lont AP, Tanis PJ, Gallee MP, Nieweg OE. Patients with penile carcinoma benefit from immediate resection of clinically occult lymph node metastases. J Urol 2005 173: 816 9
7. Scappini P, Piscioli F, Pusiol T, Hofstetter A, Rothenberger K, Luciani L. Penile cancer. Aspiration biopsy cytology for staging. Cancer 1986 58: 1526 33
8. Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Deurloo EE, Nieweg OE, Teertstra HJ. Ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology before sentinel node biopsy in patients with penile carcinoma. BJU Int 2005 95: 517 21
9. Horenblas S. Lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Part 1: diagnosis of lymph node metastasis. BJU Int 2001 88: 467 72
10. Senthil Kumar MP, Ananthakrishnan N, Prema V. Predicting regional lymph node metastasis in carcinoma of the penis: a comparison between fine-needle aspiration cytology, sentinel lymph node biopsy and medial inguinal lymph node biopsy. Br J Urol 1998 81: 453 7
11. Lubke WL, Thompson IM. The case for inguinal lymph node dissection in the treatment of T2-T4, N0 penile cancer. Semin Urol 1993 11: 80 4
12. Bevan-Thomas R, Slaton JW, Pettaway CA. Contemporary morbidity from lymphadenectomy for penile squamous cell carcinoma: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience. J Urol 2002 167: 1638 42
13. Horenblas S, van Tinteren H, Delemarre JF, Moonen LM, Lustig V, van Waardenburg EW. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. III. Treatment of regional lymph nodes. J Urol 1993 149: 492 7
14. Bouchot O, Rigaud J, Maillet F, Hetet JF, Karam G. Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma. Eur Urol 2004 45: 761 6
15. Cabanas RM. An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer 1977 39: 456 66
16. Pettaway CA, Pisters LL, Dinney CP et al. Sentinel lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. J Urol 1995 154: 1999 2003
17. Perinetti E, Crane DB, Catalona WJ. Unreliability of sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging penile carcinoma. J Urol 1980 124: 734 5
18. McDougal WS. Carcinoma of the penis: improved survival by early regional lymphadenectomy based on the histological grade and depth of invasion of the primary lesion. J Urol 1995 154: 1364 6
19. Akduman B, Fleshner NE, Ehrlich L, Klotz L. Early experience in intermediate risk penile cancer with sentinel node identification using the gamma probe. Urology 2001 58: 65 8
20. Tanis PJ, Lont AP, Meinhardt W, Olmos RA, Nieweg OE, Horenblas S. Dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer. reliability of a staging technique. J Urol 2002 168: 76 80
21. Valdes Olmos RA, Tanis PJ, Hoefnagel CA et al. Penile lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node identification. Eur J Nucl Med 2001 28: 581 5
22. Kroon BK, Lont AP, Valdes Olmos RA, Nieweg OE, Horenblas S. Morbidity of dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile carcinoma. J Urol 2005 173: 813 5
23. Algaba F, Horenblas S, Pizzocaro-Luigi Piva G, Solsona E, Windahl T, European Association of Urology. EAU guidelines on penile cancer. Eur Urol 2002 42: 199 203
24. Lont AP, Horenblas S, Tanis PJ, Gallee MP, van Tinteren H, Nieweg OE. Management of clinically node negative penile carcinoma: improved survival after the introduction of dynamic sentinel node biopsy. J Urol 2003 170: 783 6
25. Wajsman Z, Gamarra M, Park JJ, Beckley S, Pontes JE. Transabdominal fine needle aspiration of retroperitoneal lymph nodes in staging of genitourinary tract cancer (correlation with lymphography and lymph node dissection findings). J Urol 1982 128: 1238 40
26. Horenblas S, Van Tinteren H, Delemarre JF, Moonen LM, Lustig V, Kroger R. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: accuracy of tumor, nodes and metastasis classification system, and role of lymphangiography, computerized tomography scan and fine needle aspiration cytology. J Urol 1991 146: 1279 83
27. Luciani L, Piscioli F, Scappini P, Pusiol T. Value and role of percutaneous regional node aspiration cytology in the management of penile carcinoma. Eur Urol 1984 10: 294 302
28. Piscioli F, Scappini P, Luciani L. Aspiration cytology in the staging of urologic cancer. Cancer 1985 56: 1173 80
29. Abi-Aad AS, deKernion JB. Controversies in ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy for cancer of the penis. Urol Clin North Am 1992 19: 319 24