The pros and cons of change in individuals with eating disorders: A broader perspective

International Journal of Eating Disorders

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 394-403

  Gale, Corinne ^b   Holliday, Joanna ^b   Troop, Nicholas A ^c   Serpell, Lucy ^a   Treasure, Janet ^b,d  

^a ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ambivalence; Motivation; P CAN; Principal components analyses; Pros and Cons of Eating Disorders

Indexed keywords

AMBIVALENCE; ANOREXIA NERVOSA; ARTICLE; BULIMIA; EATING DISORDER; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE; ANOREXIA NERVOSA; BODY IMAGE; BULIMIA; DEFENSE MECHANISMS; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONDON; MALE; MOTIVATION; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT DROPOUTS; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; SELF EFFICACY;

EID: 33745190047     PISSN: 02763478     EISSN: 1098108X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eat.20250     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Vitousek K, Watson S, Wilson GT. Enhancing motivation for change in treatment-resistant eating disorders. Clin Psychol Rev 1996;18:391.
2. Mahon J. Dropping out from psychological treatment for eating disorders: what are the issues? Eur Eat Disord Rev 2000;8:198.
3. Steiner H, Mazer C, Litt IF. Compliance and outcome in anorexia nervosa. West J Med 1990;34:133.
4. Vandereycken W, Pierloot R. Drop-out during in-patient treatment of anorexia nervosa: a clinical study of 133 patients. Br J Med Psychol 1983;56:145.
5. Costarelli S, Colloca P. The effects of attitudinal ambivalence on pro-environmental behavioural intentions. J Environ Psychol 2004;24:279.
6. Kaplan KJ. On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: a suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychol Bull 1972;77:361.
7. Thompson MM, Zanna AW, Griffin DW. Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In: Petty RE, Krosnick JA, editors. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1995, p 361.
8. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Attitudinal ambivalence: a test of three key hypotheses. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2000;26:1421.
9. Treasure J, Schmidt U. Ready, willing and able to change: motivational aspects of the assessment and treatment of eating disorders. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2001;9:4.
10. Geller J, Cockell SJ, Drab DL. Assessing readiness for change in the eating disorders', the psychometric properties of the readiness and motivation interview. Psychol Assess 2001;13:189.
11. Rieger E, Touyz S, Schotte D, et al. Development of an instrument to assess readiness to recover in anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 2000;28:387.
12. Treasure JL, Katzman M, Schmidt U, et al. Engagement and outcome in the treatment of bulimia nervosa: first phase of a sequential design comparing motivation enhancement therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy. Behav Res Ther 1999;37:405.
13. Halmi KA, Agras WS, Mitchell J, et al. Relapse predictors of patients with bulimia nervosa who achieved abstinence through cognitive behavioural therapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002;59:1105.
14. Wolk SL, Devlin MJ. Stage of change as a predictor of response to psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 2001;30:96.
15. Franco DL. Ready or not? Stages of change as predictors of brief group therapy outcome in bulimia nervosa. Group 1997;21:39.
16. Schmidt U, Bone G, Hems S, et al. Structured therapeutic writing tasks as an adjunct to treatment in eating disorders. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2002;10:299.
17. Serpell L, Treasure J, Teasdale J, et al. Anorexia nervosa: friend or foe? Int J Eat Disord 1999;25:177.
18. Serpell L, Treasure J. Bulimia nervosa: friend or foe? The pros and cons of bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 2002;32:164.
19. Cockell SJ, Geller J, Linden W. The development of a decisional balance scale for anorexia nervosa. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2002;10:359.
20. Geller J. Estimating readiness for change in anorexia nervosa: comparing clients, clinicians and research assessors. Int J Eat Disord 2002;31:251.
21. Serpell L, Teasdale J, Troop N, et al. The development of the P-CAN: a scale to operationalise the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 2004;36:416.
22. Fairburn CG, Begun SJ. The assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire? Int J Eat Disord 1994;16:363.
23. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
24. Keller MB, Lavori PW, Friedman B, et al. The Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation. A comprehensive method for assessing outcome in prospective longitudinal studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987;44:540.
25. Fairburn CG, Cooper Z. The Eating Disorder Examination (12th ed.). In: Fairburn C, Wilson GT, editors. Binge Eating: Nature, Assessment, and Treatment. New York: Guilford Press; 1993, p 317.
26. Anderluh MB, Tchanturia K, Rabe-Hesketh S, et al. Childhood obsessive-compulsive personality traits in adult women with eating disorders: defining a broader eating disorder phenotype. Am J Psychiatry 2003;160:242.
27. Treasure J, Schmidt UH. Available from URL: www.clinicalevidence. org [accessed January 24, 2001].
28. Fairburn CG, Cooper P. Eating disorders. In: Hawton K, Salkovskis P, Kirk J, et al., editors. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Psychiatric Problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989, p 227.
29. Geller J. What a motivational approach is and what a motivational approach isn't: reflections and responses. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2002;10:155.