State and local law enforcement is not ready for a Cyber Katrina

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 81-83

  Bhaskar, Rahul ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER FORENSICS; COMPUTER SECURITY RESPONSE PLAN; INFRASTRUCTURE ORGANIZATIONS; TRADITIONAL CRIME INVESTIGATION PROCESSES;

COMPUTER CRIME; DATA PRIVACY; FEEDBACK; PATTERN RECOGNITION SYSTEMS; PUBLIC POLICY; SECURITY OF DATA; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

LAW ENFORCEMENT;

EID: 33745188425     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: 00010782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1113034.1113075     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Bhaskar, R. and Pendharkar, P.C. Wisconsin Division of Narcotics uses multi-agent information system for drug crime investigation. Interfaces, INFORMS (May-June 1999).
2. Cohn L. et al. Hurricane of criticism. Business Week (Sept. 19, 2005), New York.
3. Homeland Security Presidential Directive/HSPD5. Feb. 2003; www.white-house.gov/news/releases/2003/02/20030228-9.html (accessed Nov. 2005).
4. The FBI Bulletin. Computer forensics: Characteristics and preservation (2003, accessed from www.findarticles.com Sept. 2005).
5. Gartner Group. Teleconference on Computer Security (Oct. 2004, accessed Oct. 2005 from www.gartner.com).
6. Incident Command System (accessed from www.osha.gov, Sept. 2005).
7. Killerece, G. et al. State of Practice of Computer Security Incident Response Teams (accessed from www.sei.org on May 15, 2005)
8. MSISAC: Mission and Goals (accessed Sept. 2005 from www.cscic.state.ny. us/msisac/).
9. The National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace (Feb. 2003, accessed Sept. 2005 from www.dhs.gov).