Rampant host switching and multiple female body colour transitions in Philotrypesis (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Agaonidae)

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1157-1166

  Jiang, Z F ^b   Huang, D W ^a,c   Chen, L L ^a,b   Zhen, W Q ^a,b   Fu, Y G ^d   Peng, Z Q ^d  

^a INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c SHANDONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d INSTITUTE OF TROPICAL BIOSCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Body colour; Fig wasp; Host switching; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

DNA; PRIMER DNA;

HOST LOCATION; PHYLOGENETICS; PIGMENT; TAXONOMY; WASP;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COLOR; FEMALE; GENETICS; HYMENOPTERA; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; COLOR; DNA; DNA PRIMERS; FEMALE; HYMENOPTERA; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

AFRICA;

AGAONIDAE; CHALCIDOIDEA; FICUS (ANGIOSPERM); HYMENOPTERA; MORACEAE; PHILOTRYPESIS;

EID: 33745186006     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01087.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Barker F.K. Lutzoni F.M. 2002. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 51 : 625 637.
2. Beddard F.E. 1892. Animal colouration: an account of the principal facts and theories related to the colours and markings of animals. Swan and Sonnenschein, London.
3. Bock I.R. 1980. Current status of the Drosophila melanogaster species-group (Diptera). Syst. Ent. 5 : 341 356.
4. Bouček Z. 1988. Australian Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera): A Biosystematic Revision of Genera and Fourteen Families, with a Reclassification of Species. CAB, Int., Wallingford, UK.
5. Bronstein J.L. 1991. The non-pollinating wasp fauna of Ficus pertusa: exploitation of a mutualism OIKOS 61 : 175 186.
6. Buckler E.S.T. Ippolito A. Holtsford T.P. 1997. The evolution of ribosomal DNA: divergent paralogues and phylogenetic implications. Genetics 145 : 821 832.
7. Campbell B.C. Steffen-Campbell J.D. Werren J.H. 1993. Phylogeny of the Nasonia species complex (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) inferred from an rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS2). Insect Molec. Biol. 2 : 255 237.
8. Cook J.M. Rasplus J.Y. 2003. Mutualists with attitude: coevolving fig waSPS and figs. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18 : 241 248.
9. Crozier R.H. Crozier Y.C. Mackinlay A.G. 1989. The CO-I and CO-II region of honeybee mitochondrial DNA: evidence for variation in insect mitochondrial evolutionary rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6 : 399 411.
10. Cunningham C.W. 1997. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined Mol. Biol. Evol. 14 : 733 740.
11. Darlu P. Lecointre G. 2002. When does the incongruence length difference test fail Mol. Biol. Evol. 19 : 432 437.
12. Dowton M. Austin A.D. 2001. Simultaneous analysis of 16S, 28S, COI and morphology in the Hymenoptera: Apocrita - evolutionary transitions among parasitic waSPS. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 74 : 87 111.
13. Dowton M. Austin A.D. 2002. Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy-the behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analyses. Syst. Biol. 51 : 19 31.
14. Faith D.P. Cranston P.S. 1991. Could a cladogram this short have arisen by chance alone? On permutation tests for cladistic structure. Cladistics 7 : 1 28.
15. Farris J.S. Kallersjo M. Kluge A.G. Bult C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10 : 315 319.
16. Forsman A. Appelqvist S. 1998. Visual predators impose correlational selection on colour pattern and behaviour. Behav. Ecol. 9 : 409 413.
17. Gilbert P. Moreteau B. David J.R. Scheiner S.M. 1998. Describing the evolution of reaction norm shape: body pigmentation in Drosophila. Evolution 52 : 1501 1506.
18. Goldman N. 1993. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 36 : 182 198.
19. Harry M. Solignac M. Lachaise D. 1998. Molecular evidence for parallel evolution of adaptive syndromes in fig-breeding Lissocephala (Drosophilidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9 : 542 551.
20. Hollocher H. Hatcher J.L. Dyreson E.G. 2000. Evolution of abdominal pigmentation differences across species in the Drosophila dunni subgroup. Evolution 54 : 2046 2056.
21. Huelsenbeck J.P. Bollback J.P. 2001. Empirical and hierarchical Bayesian estimation of ancestral states. Syst. Biol. 50 : 351 366.
22. Huelsenbeck J.P. Ronquist F. 2001. mrbayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17 : 754 755.
23. Hung Y.T. Chen C.A. Wu W.J. Lin C.C. Shih C.J. 2004. Phylogenetic utility of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2 in Strumigenys spp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 32 : 407 415.
24. Jermiin L.S. Crozier R.H. 1994. The cytochrome b region in the mitochondrial DNA of the ant Tetraponera rufoniger: sequence divergence in Hymenoptera may be associated with nucleotide content. J. Mol. Evol. 38 : 282 294.
25. Joseph K.J. 1958. Recherches sur les chalcidiens Blastophaga psenes (L.) du figuier Ficus carica (L.). Annals Sci. Nat. Zool. 20 : 197 260.
26. Jousselin E. van Noort S. Greeff J.M. 2004. Labile male morphology and intraspecific male polymorphism in the Philotrypesis fig waSPS. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 33 : 706 718.
27. Kelley S.T. Farrell B.D. 1998. Is specialization a dead end? The phylogeny of host use in Dendroctonus bark beetles (Scolytidae). Evolution 52 : 1731 1743.
28. Lopez-Vaamonde C. Godfray C. Cook J.M. 2003. Evolutionary dynamics of host-plant use in a genus of leaf-mining moth. Evolution 57 : 1804 1821.
29. Lopez-Vaamonde C. Godfray H.C.J. West S.A. Hansson C. Cook J.M. 2005. The evolution of host use and unusual reproductive strategies in Achrysocharoides parasitoid waSPS. J. Evol. Biol. 18 : 1029 1041.
30. Lopez-Vaamonde C. Rasplus J.Y. Weiblen G.D. Cook J.M. 2001. Molecular phylogenies of fig waSPS: partial cocladogenesis of pollinators and parasites. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 21 : 55 71.
31. Machado C.A. Herre E.A. McCafferty S.S. Bermingham E. 1996. Molecular phylogenies of fig pollination and non-pollinating waSPS and the implications for the origin and evolution of the fig-fig wasp mutualism. J. Biogeogr. 23 : 531 542.
32. Maddison W.P. Maddison D.R. 1992. macclade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Version 3.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
33. Michaloud G. Carriere S. Kobbi M. 1996. Exceptions to the one: one relationship between African fig trees and their fig wasp pollinators: Possible evolutionary scenarios. J. Biogeogr. 23 : 513 520.
34. Molbo D. Machado C.A. Sevenster J.G. Keller L. Herre E.A. 2003. Cryptic species of fig-pollinating waSPS: implications for the evolution of the fig-wasp mutualism, sex allocation, and precision of adaptation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100 : 5867 5872.
35. Normark B.B. McCune A.R. Harrison R.G. 1991. Phylogenetic relationships of neopterygian fishes, inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 8 : 819 834.
36. Posada D. Crandall K.A. 1998. model test: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14 : 817 818.
37. Poulton E.B. 1890. The colours of animals: their meaning and use, especially considered in the case of insects. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trener, London.
38. Ramirez B.W. 1970. Host specificity of fig waSPS (Agaonidae). Evolution 24 : 680 691.
39. Ramirez B.W. 1974. Coevolution of Ficus and Agaonidae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 61 : 770 780.
40. Ramirez B.W. 1980. Evolution of the monoecious and dioecious habit in Ficus (Moraceae). Brenesia 18 : 207 216.
41. Rasplus J.-Y. 1996. The one-to-one species specificity of the Ficus-Agaoninae mutualism: how casual?. In : The Biodiversity of African plants ( L. J. van der Maesen X. M. van der Burgt J. M. van Medenbach de Rooy, eds pp. 639 649. Kluwer Academic Publishers, the Netherlands.
42. Rasplus J.Y. Kerdelhue C. Le Clainche I. Mondor G. 1998. Molecular phylogeny of fig waSPS Agaonidae are not monophyletic. Comptes Rendus De l'Academie Des Sciences. Serie III, Sciences De La Vie 321 : 517 526.
43. Rokas A. Atkinson R.J. Brown G.S. West S.A. Stone G.N. 2001. Understanding forms of genetic diversity in the oak gall wasp Biorhiza pallida: demographic history or a Wolbachia selective sweep Heredity 87 : 294 304.
44. Sambrook J. Fritsch E.F. Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular Cloning: a laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Lab Press, Plaiview, NY.
45. Shimodaira H. Hasegawa M. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16 : 1114 1116.
46. Simon C. Friedlander F. Beckenbach A. Crespi B. Liu H. Flook P. 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annal Entomol. Soc. Am. 87 : 651 701.
47. Swofford D.L. 2002. paup*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
48. Thompson J.D. Higgins D.G. Gibson T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22 : 4673 4680.
49. Weiblen G.D. 2002. How to be a fig wasp? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47 : 299 330.
50. Weiblen G.D. Bush G.L. 2002. Speciation in fig pollinators and parasites. Mol. Ecol. 11 : 1573 1578.
51. West S.A. Herre E.A. 1994. The ecology of the New World fig-parasitizing waSPS Idarnes and implications for the evolution of the fig-pollinator mutualism. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 258 : 67 72.
52. Wiebes J.T. 1979. Co-evolution of figs and their insect pollinators. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10 : 1 12.
53. Wilmer P.G. Unwin D.M. 1981. Field analysis of insect heat budgets: reflectance, size and heating rates. Oecologia 50 : 250 255.
54. Wittkopp P.J. Carroll S.B. Kopp A. 2003. Evolution in black and white: genetic control of pigment forms in Drosophila. Trends Genet. 19 : 495 504.